Pd1 antibody sintilimab for dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced rectal cancer: An open-label, phase 2, single-arm study (cohort A).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15602-e15602
Author(s):  
Gong Chen ◽  
Feng Wang ◽  
Weiwei Xiao ◽  
Ying Jin ◽  
Rong-Xin Zhang ◽  
...  

e15602 Background: Immunotherapy has shown satisfactory effect for dMMR/MSI-H colorectal cancer patients. Whether Pd-1 antibody would bring benefit for dMMR/MSI-H locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients in neoadjuvant setting is worthy of investigation. This is a clinical trial with two cohorts according the MMR/MSI status(clinicalTrials.gov, NCT04304209). Methods: LARC patients with dMMR or MSI-H tumor will enter Cohort A and receive neoadjuvant Pd1 antibody sintilimab for four cycles and subsequent surgery or watch and wait, followed by adjuvant four cycles of Pd1 antibody sintilimab with or without chemotherapy. Main inclusion criteria include: cT3-4N0M0 or cTxN+M0 rectal adenocarcinoma, dMMR/MSI-H confirmed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or gene test, aged 18-75y; ECOG performance 0-1; no previous anti-tumor treatment for rectal adenocarcinoma. Primary outcome is pathologic complete response (pCR) rate. We use a Simon two-stage optimum design to test the null hypothesis of a 15% pCR rate, the historical response rate to standard neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT), against the desired alternative of 30% pCR rate. This had a one-sided type I error of 5% and a power of 80%. In the first stage of this design, 19 patients will be accrued. If 3 or fewer pCR was observed, the study was to be terminated and declared negative. If the trial goes on to the second stage, a total of 55 patients will be studied. The study was deemed to have met its primary endpoint if confirmed pCR were observed in 13 or more patients. Considering 10% dropout rate, a total of 61 patients will be enrolled. Whole exome sequencing, bulk RNA sequencing, single cell RNA sequencing and IHC of the rectal primary tumor are planned. The study started in October, 2019. Results: Eight patients have been enrolled and six have response evaluation results. Four patients achieved clinical complete response (cCR) after 4 cycles of neoadjuvant Pd1 antibody sintilimab treatment and three of them enter watch and wait strategy and finished the adjuvant 4 cycles of Pd1 antibody sintilimab treatment. The 4th patient was diagnosed as lynch syndrome, but molecular test was not feasible for the tumors located at the sigmoid and hepatic flexure because of ileus. He received subtotal colectomy and tumors at the sigmoid and hepatic flexure also achieved pCR. The 5th patient has partial response after 4 and 8 cycles of sintilimab treatment, and then received Dixon surgery and pathology showed major reponse (5% cancer cell left only in the mucosal layer, ypTis). The 6th patient has partial response after 4 and 8 cycles of sintilimab treatment, and sintilimab was still continued concerning intact bladder conservation. No grade 3 toxicity was noted yet. Conclusions: Pd1 antibody sintilimab achieved 4CR (pCR+cCR) in 6 dMMR/MSI-H LARC patients with limited toxicities. Pd1 antibody is quite effective and may be an alternative for these patients. Clinical trial information: NCT04304209.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS144-TPS144
Author(s):  
Paul Bernard Romesser ◽  
Emma B. Holliday ◽  
Tony Philip ◽  
Rocio Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
...  

TPS144 Background: Perioperative radiotherapy and chemotherapy, followed by total mesorectal excision, is the standard of care for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, 1/3 of these patients still develop distant metastases, indicating the need for more effective therapies. In addition, strategies that increase pathological complete response rates are needed to enable non-surgical management of LARC. DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) regulates a key DNA damage repair pathway for double-strand break repair. Peposertib (M3814), a potent, selective, orally administered DNA-PK inhibitor, has been shown to potentiate the effect of ionizing radiation in a human colon cancer xenograft model and several colon cancer cell lines. Peposertib is being investigated in several different trials across multiple indications. This Phase Ib/II study (NCT03770689) aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of the neoadjuvant treatment combination of peposertib, capecitabine, and radiotherapy (RT) in patients with LARC. Methods: Patients aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed and resectable Stage II/III rectal adenocarcinoma are eligible. Induction chemotherapy is permitted, but residual disease must first be documented by MRI, digital rectal examination and endoscopy. Patients who received other anticancer therapies or those with prior pelvic RT are excluded. At open-label Phase Ib (open), 18–30 patients (n = 3 per cohort) will receive peposertib + capecitabine (orally, 825 mg/m2 twice daily [BID]) + RT (45–50.4 Gy), 5 days/week. Peposertib 50 mg once daily (QD) was the starting dose. Additional dose levels will range between 100─800 mg QD. Dose escalation is determined by the safety monitoring committee and guided by a Bayesian 2-parameter logistic regression model. At Phase II (planned), 150 patients will be randomized (1:1) to receive oral capecitabine (825 mg/m2 BID) + RT (45–50 Gy), with either oral peposertib (recommended phase II dose [RP2D] or placebo, QD for 5 days/week. Primary objectives are to define a maximum tolerated dose and RP2D (Phase Ib), and to evaluate the efficacy of peposertib + capecitabine + RT in terms of pathological/clinical complete response (Phase II). Secondary objectives include assessment of antitumor activity (Phase Ib), quality of life outcomes (Phase II), and PK of peposertib, and the safety and tolerability of the combination therapy (both phases). To date, one patient has received peposertib 50 mg QD, six patients peposertib 100 mg QD, three patients peposertib 150 mg QD, and three patients peposertib 250 mg QD. Clinical trial information: NCT03770689.


2020 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00158
Author(s):  
Ashray Gunjur ◽  
Grace Chazan ◽  
Genni Newnham ◽  
Sue-Anne McLachlan

PURPOSE: In patients with rectal cancer who achieve a clinical complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, it may be reasonable to adopt a watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy rather than proceed to immediate resection of the rectum. Patient preferences for this strategy are unknown. The primary aim of the current study was to determine the feasibility of assessing hypothetical recurrence and survival differences that relevant patients would tolerate to avoid immediate resection of the rectum. A secondary aim included estimating patients’ tolerance thresholds and the factors that might predict them. METHODS: We developed a study-specific written questionnaire based on a previously validated instrument. Hypothetical time tradeoff tasks were used to determine the recurrence rate patients would accept to adopt a W&W strategy and the survival benefit that would be needed to justify choosing immediate resection over W&W. Feasibility was measured on the basis of response rate, the stated ease of completion and the satisfaction of task, and time used. RESULTS: Twenty of 31 potentially eligible patients completed the study-specific questionnaire. The majority of respondents felt that questions were clear (70%) and not hard to understand (65%). The median acceptable recurrence risk to adopt a W&W strategy was 20% (interquartile range [IQR], 10%-35%). Patients required a median of 2.0 extra years of survival (IQR, 1.0-3.0 years) over a baseline 7.0 years, and they required a median extra 10% (IQR, 4%-19%) over baseline 70% survival rates to justify immediate resection. CONCLUSION: Measuring the preferences of patients with rectal cancer using time tradeoff methods seemed to be feasible. Larger studies are needed to confirm how acceptable a W&W strategy would be for relevant patients.


Author(s):  
J. F. Huisman ◽  
I. J. H. Schoenaker ◽  
R. M. Brohet ◽  
O. Reerink ◽  
H. van der Sluis ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is found in 15–20% of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. A watch-and-wait (W&W) strategy has been introduced as an alternative strategy to avoid surgery for selected patients with a clinical complete response at multidisciplinary response evaluation. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the multidisciplinary response evaluation by comparing the proportion of patients with pCR since the introduction of the structural response evaluation with the period before response evaluation. Methods This retrospective cohort study enrolled patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent nCRT between January 2009 and May 2018, categorizing them into cohort A (period 2009–2015) and cohort B (period 2015–2018). The patients in cohort B underwent structural multidisciplinary response evaluation with the option of the W&W strategy. Proportion of pCR (ypT0N0), time-to-event (pCR) analysis, and stoma-free survival were evaluated in both cohorts. Results Of the 259 patients in the study, 21 (18.4%) in cohort A and in 8 (8.7%) in cohort B had pCR (p = 0.043). Time-to-event analysis demonstrated a significant pCR decline in cohort B (p < 0.001). The stoma-free patient rate was 24% higher in cohort B (p < 0.001). Conclusion Multidisciplinary clinical response evaluation after nCRT for locally advanced rectal cancer led to a significant decrease in unnecessary surgery for the patients with a complete response.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14543-14543
Author(s):  
J. Ahn ◽  
H. Choi ◽  
S. Cheon ◽  
S. Shin ◽  
K. Keum ◽  
...  

14543 Background: S-1 is a novel, orally administered 5-FU analogue and is known of radiosensitizer. The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility and efficacy of S-1 in combination with weekly irionotecan with concurrent pelvic radiotherapy (RT) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Methods: Clinical stage T3–4 or N+(on MRI) rectal adenocarcinoma patients received weekly irinotecan 40mg/m2(day1,8,15,22,29) and S-1 at dose levels of 40, 50, 60 and 70mg/m2 (5days a week from day 1 to 38) according to phase I methodology. Concurrently conventional RT was given at daily fractions of 1.8 Gy on 5 days a week for a total dose of 50.4 (45 + 5.4)Gy. Surgery was performed 4–8 weeks following completion of chemoradiation. Results: A total 16 patients (10M/7F, median age 46 years, ECOG PS0–1) were enrolled between August 2005 and July 2006. One pt withdrew the consent during CCRT. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurred at 50mg/m2 of S-1 in one of six pts (G4 cerebral infarction). At dose of 60, 70mg/m2 of S-1, no DLT occurred. G3/4 toxicties were rare. Fifthteen pts underwent surgery and R0 resection was achieved in 13 pts. Four pts (25.0%) had a pathological complete response. Conclusions: The recommended dose (RD) for further study is S-1 70mg/m2 with irinotecan and radiotherapy. Neoadjuvant S-1/irinotecan/RT is feasible and well tolerated. Phase II trial is being conducted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 681-681
Author(s):  
Ji Zhu ◽  
Jingwen Wang

681 Background: A watch-and-wait approach for patients with clinical complete response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation could avoid the morbidity of conventional surgery for rectal cancer. Here, we report the survival outcome of patients with this strategy in our center. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the rectal cancer patients who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy since 2015 in our center. Preoperative regimen included long-course radiotherapy (50 Gy / 25 Fx) combined fluoropyrimidin–based chemotherapy concurrently. MRI and endoscopic evaluation were performed after preoperative treatment. Patients with complete tumor response were referred to the “watch-and-wait” approach and omitted the surgery. Four to six cycles of consolidation chemotherapy were performed. Patients were followed up clinically, endoscopically, and radiologically to assess for local recurrence or disease progression. Results: From January 2015 to March 2018, a total of 47 patients with rectal cancer in our center received conservative treatment following neoadjuvant therapy. The median age of the patients is 58 (53-66). The proportions of stages I to IV are 4.3%, 12.8%, 70.2%, 8.5%, respectively. After a median follow-up of 20 month, tumor regrowth occurred in five out of 47 (10.6%) patients. All local regrowth was diagnosed in the first two years, and four out of five (80%) of local regrowth was located in the bowel wall. All patients underwent salvage surgery. Distant metastasis was diagnosed in four of 47 patients (8.5%). two-year overall survival was 89.9%, and two-year disease-free survival was 76.5%. Conclusions: Organ preservation for locally advanced rectal cancer is feasible for selected patients who achieve a complete response to individualized neoadjuvant CRT. The survival of patients is not impaired with “watch-and-wait” strategy.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS4123-TPS4123
Author(s):  
Andrea Cercek ◽  
Zsofia Kinga Stadler ◽  
Jenna L. Cohen ◽  
Jill A Weiss ◽  
Michelle F. Lamendola-Essel ◽  
...  

TPS4123 Background: The treatment of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer includes total neoadjuvant therapy with chemotherapy, chemoradiation followed by surgery. While most rectal cancers respond to combination induction chemotherapy, patients with mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or MSI-H tumors have a significantly higher chance of progression with this treatment regimen. dMMR or MSI-H tumors have shown remarkable responses to PD-1 blockade, but the effect of neoadjuvant checkpoint inhibition has not been well studied. In this trial we will determine the pathologic complete response rate (pCR) of neoadjuvant anti-PD-1 blockade followed by standard chemoradiation in dMMR or MSI-H locally advanced rectal cancer. We hypothesize that treatment naïve dMMR or MSI-H rectal cancers will achieve a robust clinical response to PD-1 blockade and that the total neodjuvant therapy with PD-1 blockade followed by chemoradiation will improve pCR rates. Methods: Eligible patients ≥18 years of age with Stage II (T3-4, N-) or Stage III (any T, N+) histologically confirmed dMMR or MSI-H (by NGS) rectal adenocarcinoma will be enrolled. Patients will receive TSR-042 (500mg IV) every 3 weeks for a maximum of 8 cycles (6 months of treatment). Imaging, internal endoscopic exam and ctDNA blood draw will be performed at 6 weeks and every 3 months during induction anti-PD-1 treatment. Adverse events and surgical complications will be graded according to the NCI CTCAE v5 and the Clavien-Dindo classification, respectively. Following neoadjuvant checkpoint blockade, patients will undergo conventional chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection. The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response compared with historical control in pMMR patients. Patients will be followed up every 6 months for assessment of disease-free survival for up to five years. Clinical trial information: NCT04165772 .


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Maslova ◽  
Heinz Herden ◽  
Karin Schork ◽  
Michael Turewicz ◽  
Martin Eisenacher ◽  
...  

Therapeutic strategies for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) who are achieving a pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy (neoCRT) are being increasingly investigated. Recent trials challenge the current standard therapy of total mesorectal excision (TME). For some patients, the treatment strategy of “watch-and-wait” seems a preferable procedure. The key factor in determining individual treatment strategies following neoCRT is the precise evaluation of the tumor response. Contrast-enhanced computer tomography (ceCT) has proven its ability to discriminate benign and malign lesions in multiple cancers. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the ceCT based density of LARC in 30 patients, undergoing neoCRT followed by TME. We compared the tumors´ pre- and post-neoCRT density and correlated the results to the amount of residual vital tumor cells in the resected tissue. Overall, the density decreased after neoCRT, with the highest decrease in patients achieving pCR. Densitometry demonstrated a specificity of 88% and sensitivity of 68% in predicting pCR. Thus, we claim that ceCT based densitometry is a useful tool in identifying patients with LARC who may benefit from a “watch-and-wait” strategy and suggest further prospective studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document