A phase II study of anlotinib in the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23531-e23531
Author(s):  
Xin Huang ◽  
Zhaoming Ye ◽  
Tao Li ◽  
Yongzhong Wei ◽  
Shoufeng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
First Line Treatment

e23531 Background: Standard treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma is chemotherapy based on anthracyclines, while the tolerance of chemotherapy is limited. We assessed if anlotinib, a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is efficacy and safety for the first-line treatment of these patients. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial (NCT03792542) including 44 planned subjects. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years old, diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma and had at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.1. Other inclusion criteria included ECOG PS 0̃2, chemotherapy and anti-angiogenesis treatment naïve. Patients were administrated 12mg anlotinib once daily for 14 days every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Safety assessment was done in patients who received at least one dose of anlotinib. Here we report the results of a planned interim analysis. Results: From April 2019 to December 2020, 29 patients (16 males and 13 females) were enrolled from 7 hospitals in China. The median age is 57 (range 23-69). Pathological types included liposarcoma (n = 8), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 5), fibrosarcoma (n = 5), synovial sarcoma (n = 4), and others (n = 7). At the data cutoff date on December 31, 2020, the median duration of treatment was 5.3 months, and the median PFS was not reached. 26 patients were eligible for the evaluation of tumor response.1 achieved partial response (PR) and the objective response rate (ORR) was 3.85% (1/26). 24 had stale disease (SD) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 96.2% (25/26). The clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as the proportion of patients who achieved durable disease control (CR/PR/SD) more than 4 and 6 months, were 65.4% (17/26) and 38.5% (10/26) respectively. Most adverse events (AE) were grade 1 or 2. The most common grade 3 AE was hypertension (17.2%). No grade 4 AEs or treatment related death occurred in this study through the last follow-up. Conclusions: This interim analysis showed anlotinib of promising efficacy and favorable tolerance in the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic soft- tissue sarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03792542.

scholarly journals A Phase I/II Study of a 72-h Continuous Infusion of Etoposide in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Sarcoma ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 1 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles R. Crawley ◽  
Ian R. Judson ◽  
Mark Verrill ◽  
Catherine Hill ◽  
Florence I. Raynaud
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity ◽  
First Line Treatment

Purpose. The study was performed to assess the antitumour activity and toxicity of a 72-h continuous infusion of single-agent etoposide as second-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS), following reports of substantial activity using this schedule of etoposide administration as first-line treatment in combination with ifosfamide.Patients/method. This was an open phase I/II trial performed at a single institution in patients with metastatic or locally advanced STS who had failed first-line treatment with doxorubicin + ifosfamide combination chemotherapy or, less commonly, single-agent treatment with doxorubicin or ifosfamide. Etoposide was given as a continuous intravenous infusion over 72 h. The starting dose level was 200 mgm−2day−1× 3 escalating in 10% steps in cohorts of three patients until dose-limiting toxicity was encountered.Results. Seventeen patients were treated, median age 47 years (range 26–71 years). No responses were seen in 16 assessable patients despite etoposide levels in the cotoxic range. The steady-state plasma concentration exceeded 8μg ml−1in all patients and in patients treated at ≥ 600 mg m−2the mean steady-state level was 14.4μg ml−1. The median event-free survival was 6 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.31–8.69) and the overall survival 16 weeks (95% CI 9.28–22.72). The maximum tolerated dose in this pretreated patient group was 200 mg m−2day−1× 3. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression.Discussion. Etoposide given by 72-h infusion is inactive as second-line chemotherapy in STS. It is associated with significant toxicity when given in these doses, in this patient group.

Adriamycin and Cis-Platinum as First-Line Treatment in Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Adult Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haralabos P. Kalofonos ◽  
Dimitrios Bafaloukos ◽  
Theodoros G. Kourelis ◽  
Michalis V. Karamouzis ◽  
Panagiotis Megas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

JUPITER-02: Randomized, double-blind, phase III study of toripalimab or placebo plus gemcitabine and cisplatin as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA2-LBA2
Author(s):  
Rui-hua Xu ◽  
Hai-Qiang Mai ◽  
Qiu-Yan Chen ◽  
Dongping Chen ◽  
Chaosu Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

LBA2 Background: Gemcitabine-cisplatin (GP) chemotherapy is the standard 1st line treatment for locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic (r/m) NPC. Toripalimab, a humanized IgG4K monoclonal antibody specific for PD-1, provided durable responses in patients (pts) with r/m NPC as monotherapy in the ≥2nd line setting (POLARIS-02 study). The results of JUPITER-02, a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded Phase III trial of toripalimab in combination with GP chemotherapy as first-line treatment for r/m NPC are summarized. Methods: Pts with advanced NPC with no prior chemotherapy in the r/m setting were randomized (1:1) to receive toripalimab 240 mg or placebo d1 in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 d1, d8 and cisplatin 80 mg/m2 d1 every 3 weeks (Q3W) for up to 6 cycles, followed by monotherapy with toripalimab or placebo Q3W until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or completion of 2 years of treatment. Stratification factors were ECOG PS (0 vs. 1) and extent of disease (recurrent vs. primary metastatic) at enrollment. Progression-free survival (PFS) and response were assessed by independent review committee (IRC) per RECIST v1.1. The primary endpoint was PFS by IRC in the ITT population. Secondary end points included ORR, DOR and OS. There was one prespecified interim analysis of PFS at 130 PFS events with a planned final analysis at 200 PFS events. Results: 289 pts were randomized: 146 to the toripalimab arm and 143 to the placebo arm. By May 30, 2020 as the interim analysis cutoff date, the median treatment duration was 39 weeks in the toripalimab arm and 36 weeks in the placebo arm. A significant improvement in PFS was detected for the toripalimab arm compared to the placebo arm (HR = 0.52 [95% CI: 0.36-0.74] two-sided p = 0.0003), with median PFS of 11.7 vs. 8.0 months. The 1-year PFS rates were 49% and 28% respectively. An improvement in PFS was observed across relevant subgroups, including all PD-L1 subgroups. The ORR was 77.4% vs. 66.4% (P = 0.033) and the median DOR was 10.0 vs. 5.7 months (HR = 0.50 [95% CI: 0.33-0.78]). As of Jan 15, 2021, OS was not mature, with 25 deaths in the toripalimab arm and 35 in the placebo arm (HR = 0.68 [95% CI: 0.41-1.14], P = 0.14). The incidence of Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) (89.0% vs 89.5%); AEs leading to discontinuation of toripalimab/placebo (7.5% vs 4.9%); and fatal AEs (2.7% vs 2.8%) were similar between two arms; however, immune-related (irAEs) (39.7% vs. 18.9%) and Grade ≥3 irAEs (7.5% vs. 0.7%) were more frequent in the toripalimab arm. Conclusions: The addition of toripalimab to GP chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment for pts with advanced NPC provided superior PFS and ORR and longer DOR than GP alone with a manageable safety profile. These results support the use of toripalimab with GP chemotherapy as the new standard care for this population. Clinical trial information: NCT03581786.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document