scholarly journals A Phase I/II Study of a 72-h Continuous Infusion of Etoposide in Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Sarcoma ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 1 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 149-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles R. Crawley ◽  
Ian R. Judson ◽  
Mark Verrill ◽  
Catherine Hill ◽  
Florence I. Raynaud
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity ◽  
First Line Treatment

Purpose. The study was performed to assess the antitumour activity and toxicity of a 72-h continuous infusion of single-agent etoposide as second-line treatment for patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS), following reports of substantial activity using this schedule of etoposide administration as first-line treatment in combination with ifosfamide.Patients/method. This was an open phase I/II trial performed at a single institution in patients with metastatic or locally advanced STS who had failed first-line treatment with doxorubicin + ifosfamide combination chemotherapy or, less commonly, single-agent treatment with doxorubicin or ifosfamide. Etoposide was given as a continuous intravenous infusion over 72 h. The starting dose level was 200 mgm−2day−1× 3 escalating in 10% steps in cohorts of three patients until dose-limiting toxicity was encountered.Results. Seventeen patients were treated, median age 47 years (range 26–71 years). No responses were seen in 16 assessable patients despite etoposide levels in the cotoxic range. The steady-state plasma concentration exceeded 8μg ml−1in all patients and in patients treated at ≥ 600 mg m−2the mean steady-state level was 14.4μg ml−1. The median event-free survival was 6 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.31–8.69) and the overall survival 16 weeks (95% CI 9.28–22.72). The maximum tolerated dose in this pretreated patient group was 200 mg m−2day−1× 3. The dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression.Discussion. Etoposide given by 72-h infusion is inactive as second-line chemotherapy in STS. It is associated with significant toxicity when given in these doses, in this patient group.

A phase II study of anlotinib in the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23531-e23531
Author(s):  
Xin Huang ◽  
Zhaoming Ye ◽  
Tao Li ◽  
Yongzhong Wei ◽  
Shoufeng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
First Line Treatment

e23531 Background: Standard treatment for patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma is chemotherapy based on anthracyclines, while the tolerance of chemotherapy is limited. We assessed if anlotinib, a multitarget tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is efficacy and safety for the first-line treatment of these patients. Methods: This is an open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial (NCT03792542) including 44 planned subjects. Eligible patients were aged 18-70 years old, diagnosed with locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma and had at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST 1.1. Other inclusion criteria included ECOG PS 0̃2, chemotherapy and anti-angiogenesis treatment naïve. Patients were administrated 12mg anlotinib once daily for 14 days every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Safety assessment was done in patients who received at least one dose of anlotinib. Here we report the results of a planned interim analysis. Results: From April 2019 to December 2020, 29 patients (16 males and 13 females) were enrolled from 7 hospitals in China. The median age is 57 (range 23-69). Pathological types included liposarcoma (n = 8), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 5), fibrosarcoma (n = 5), synovial sarcoma (n = 4), and others (n = 7). At the data cutoff date on December 31, 2020, the median duration of treatment was 5.3 months, and the median PFS was not reached. 26 patients were eligible for the evaluation of tumor response.1 achieved partial response (PR) and the objective response rate (ORR) was 3.85% (1/26). 24 had stale disease (SD) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 96.2% (25/26). The clinical benefit rate (CBR), defined as the proportion of patients who achieved durable disease control (CR/PR/SD) more than 4 and 6 months, were 65.4% (17/26) and 38.5% (10/26) respectively. Most adverse events (AE) were grade 1 or 2. The most common grade 3 AE was hypertension (17.2%). No grade 4 AEs or treatment related death occurred in this study through the last follow-up. Conclusions: This interim analysis showed anlotinib of promising efficacy and favorable tolerance in the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic soft- tissue sarcoma. Clinical trial information: NCT03792542.

Adriamycin and Cis-Platinum as First-Line Treatment in Unresectable Locally Advanced or Metastatic Adult Soft-Tissue Sarcomas

2004 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 307-311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haralabos P. Kalofonos ◽  
Dimitrios Bafaloukos ◽  
Theodoros G. Kourelis ◽  
Michalis V. Karamouzis ◽  
Panagiotis Megas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcomas ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Randomized Comparison of Pazopanib and Doxorubicin as First-Line Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma Age 60 Years or Older: Results of a German Intergroup Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (30) ◽  
pp. 3555-3564 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viktor Grünwald ◽  
Annika Karch ◽  
Markus Schuler ◽  
Patrick Schöffski ◽  
Hans-Georg Kopp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Geriatric Assessment ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Life Questionnaire ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
First Line Treatment

PURPOSE Doxorubicin is a standard of care in patients with advanced, inoperable soft tissue sarcoma (STS). We tested whether pazopanib has efficacy comparable to that of doxorubicin in elderly patients with STS and offers superior tolerability for hematologic toxicity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients age 60 years or older without previous systemic treatment for progressive advanced or metastatic STS who had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 and adequate organ function were included. Treatment consisted of pazopanib 800 mg once per day or doxorubicin 75 mg/m2 once every 3 weeks (≤ 6 cycles) after being randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio. Noninferiority was assumed for progression-free survival (PFS), if the upper limit of the 95% CI for the hazard ratio (HR) was less than 1.8. Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia were key secondary end points. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (30-item) Quality of Life Questionnaire and geriatric assessment were used to measure patient-reported outcomes. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for analysis. RESULTS Pazopanib and doxorubicin were given to 81 and 39 patients, respectively. The median age was 71 years (range, 60-88 years). PFS was noninferior (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.65 to 1.53) and the incidence of grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia favored pazopanib. Objective response rates for pazopanib and doxorubicin were 12.3% and 15.4%, respectively. Overall survival did not differ significantly between arms (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.72; P = .735). Geriatric assessment revealed 2 or more comorbidities in 15.8% of the patients and impairment of activities of daily living in 28.3% of patients. CONCLUSION Pazopanib was noninferior to doxorubicin, rendering pazopanib a putative therapeutic option in the first-line treatment of STS in patients age 60 years or older. The distinct adverse event profile may be used to counsel patients and tailor therapy to individual needs.

Determinants of first-line treatment selection in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 468-468
Author(s):  
Hui-Li Wong ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Yaling Yin ◽  
Hagen F. Kennecke ◽  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Treatment Selection ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
The Impact ◽  
First Line Treatment

468 Background: Chemotherapy options currently available for the first-line treatment of advanced PDAC include FOLFIRINOX (FX), gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel (GP) and single agent gemcitabine (Gem). GP was introduced most recently and funded for clinical use in British Columbia (BC) in September 2014. In this retrospective analysis, we explore the impact of GP availability on first-line treatment selection and overall survival (OS) in advanced PDAC. Methods: The BC Cancer Agency provincial pharmacy database was used to identify patients (pts) who started FX, GP or Gem between January and August 2014 (pre-GP) or January and August 2015 (post-GP). Pts were eligible for inclusion if they received at least one cycle of first-line therapy for locally advanced or metastatic PDAC. Clinical data were extracted from electronic medical records. OS was defined as time from diagnosis of advanced PDAC to death and compared by treatment era, adjusting for age, ECOG, comorbidities, disease extent and baseline CA19-9. Results: 286 pts fulfilled eligibility criteria: 88 (31%) with locally advanced and 198 (69%) with metastatic disease. 131 and 155 pts were treated in the pre- and post-GP eras respectively. Prior to GP approval, 44% and 49% of pts received Gem and FX; this decreased to 21% and 33% after GP funding, with 46% of pts receiving GP in the latter period. Nine (7%) pts received GP in the pre-GP era, either through self-pay or addition of nab-paclitaxel after approval. There were no significant differences in pt characteristics across both eras. 46% of pts who received GP post approval had ECOG ≥ 2. The proportion of pts receiving second-line therapy was lower in the post-GP era (22% vs. 38%). Median OS in the post-GP era was 8.1 vs. 10.1 months in the pre-GP era; adjusted HR 1.28 (95% CI 0.96–1.71). Pts with ECOG ≥ 2 who received GP had a median OS of 6.5 months. Conclusions: After GP was funded, it became the preferred first-line regimen for advanced PDAC. Its more frequent use instead of FX did not appear to compromise overall survival even though a substantial proportion of pts were ECOG ≥ 2 and few pts received second-line therapy.

Phase 1/2 study of safety/efficacy using trabectedin, ipilimumab and nivolumab triple therapy as first line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS11591-TPS11591
Author(s):  
Erlinda Maria Gordon ◽  
Victoria S. Chua-Alcala ◽  
Katherine Kim ◽  
Shiva Sreenath Andrali ◽  
Marie Del Rosario ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Triple Therapy ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
First Line Treatment

scholarly journals Cost Effectiveness of First-Line Treatment with Doxorubicin/Ifosfamide Compared to Trabectedin Monotherapy in the Management of Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Italy, Spain, and Sweden

Sarcoma ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julian F. Guest ◽  
Monica Panca ◽  
Erikas Sladkevicius ◽  
Nicholas Gough ◽  
Mark Linch
Keyword(s):  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma ◽  
Effective Use ◽  
The Cost ◽  
First Line Treatment

Background. Doxorubicin/ifosfamide is a first-line systemic chemotherapy for the majority of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS) subtypes. Trabectedin is indicated for the treatment of ASTS after failure of anthracyclines and/or ifosfamide; however it is being increasingly used off-label as a first-line treatment. This study estimated the cost effectiveness of these two treatments in the first-line management of ASTS in Italy, Spain, and Sweden.Methods. A Markov model was constructed to estimate the cost effectiveness of doxorubicin/ifosfamide compared to trabectedin monotherapy, defined as the cost per QALY gained, in each country.Results. First-line treatment with doxorubicin/ifosfamide resulted in lower two-year healthcare costs and more QALYs than first-line treatment with trabectedin monotherapy in all three countries. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that at a cost per QALY threshold of €35,000, >90% of a cohort would be cost effectively treated with doxorubicin/ifosfamide compared to trabectedin monotherapy in all three countries.Conclusion. Within the model’s limitations, first-line treatment of patients with ASTS with doxorubicin/ifosfamide instead of trabectedin monotherapy affords a cost-effective use of publicly funded healthcare resources in Italy, Spain, and Sweden and is therefore the preferred treatment in all three countries. These findings support the recommendation that trabectedin should remain a second-line treatment.

Clinical experience with oral vinorelbine (NVB) plus prednisone as first- or second-line chemotherapy of metastatic hormone- refractory prostate cancer (HRPC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16151-e16151
Author(s):  
J. M. Cervera ◽  
I. Garcia-Carbonero ◽  
R. Girones ◽  
M. Beltran ◽  
V. Calderero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Line Chemotherapy ◽  
First Line Treatment

e16151 Background: IV NVB plus hydrocortisone (HC) compared with HC alone resulted in improved clinical benefit, progression-free survival (PFS) and PSA response rate in HRPC. The oral formulation of NVB avoids the side effects associated with the IV injection, may reduce administration and toxicity-related costs and is easy to administer. Due to these advantages, single agent oral NVB treatment could be considered as an optimal option for patients (p) with HRPC previously treated with a taxane or as first-line treatment when a taxane is not indicated. We retrospectively evaluated efficacy and toxicity or oral NVB administered as single agent as first or second-line chemotherapy of metastatic HRPC. Methods: Retrospectively data was collected from p with metastatic HRPC treated with oral NVB 80 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, with a prior test of myelosensitivity at 60 mg/m2 for the first cycle, plus prednisone 10 mg/day. Patients had received a taxane as first-line treatment or had a documented contraindication to receiving docetaxel. 1 cycle was equivalent to a 3-week period. Results: Data on 55 p treated in 11 Spanish centres were included for assessment. Median age was 72.5 years (range 54–86). ECOG PS 0, 17%; 1, 66%; 2, 17%. Median PSA 75 ng/mL. Prior taxane chemotherapy, 87%. Median number of cycles was 4 (range 1–6). 53.8% of p could escalate oral NVB to 80 mg/m2. 221 cycles were performed, 4.1% were delayed and 3.2% had a dose reduction. Grade 3–4 events were infrequent and mainly haematological: neutropenia (5.5% of p), anemia (3.6%), pain (3.6%), infection (1.8%), asthenia (1.8%), respiratory (1.8%). No febrile neutropenia was reported. 49 p were evaluable for PSA response rate; complete plus partial response was observed in 20.4% (95% CI: 10.2% - 34.3%) and PSA stable was reported in 40.8%. 29 p were evaluable for measurable disease; among them, 20.7% presented partial response and 44.8% stable disease. Median follow-up was 4.3 months. Survival status: 49 p (89.1%) are alive and 6 p (10.9%) died. Conclusions: Oral NVB is a safe and active regimen in previous chemotherapy treated HRPC. For those p who can not receive a taxane as first-line therapy, oral NVB can also be considered as an effective first-line treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document