Phase III randomized trial of PSMA PET prior to definitive radiation therapy for unfavorable intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer [PSMA dRT]: Study protocol NCT04457245.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS172-TPS172
Author(s):  
Jeremie Calais ◽  
Shaojun Zhu ◽  
Nader Hirmas ◽  
Matthias Eiber ◽  
Boris A. Hadaschik ◽  
...  

TPS172 Background: Definitive radiation therapy (dRT) is an effective initial treatment of intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa). Positron emission tomography (PET) using small molecule probes targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA PET) is superior to standard of care imaging (CT, MRI, bone scan) for detecting regional and distant metastatic PCa. PSMA PET thus has the potential to guide primary radiotherapy planning in patients and improve outcomes. The purpose of the present randomized trial is to evaluate the success rate of dRT for IR or HR PCa with and without planning based on PSMA PET. Methods: We will randomize 312 patients to proceed with standard dRT (control Arm 1, n=150), or undergo a PSMA PET scan prior to dRT planning (intervention arm 2, n = 162). In the control arm, dRT will be performed as routinely planned in accordance with initial stratification. In the intervention arm, the treating radiation oncologist can incorporate PSMA PET findings into the RT planning. We assume that approximately 8% of subjects randomized to arm 2 will be found to have M1 disease and thus will be more appropriate candidates for long-term systemic or multimodal therapy, rather than curative intent dRT. PET M1 patients will thus not be included in the analysis of the primary endpoint. The primary endpoint is the success rate of dRT measured as PFS after initiation of dRT. Progression is defined as (whichever occurs first): biochemical recurrence defined as a rise by 2 ng/mL or more above the nadir PSA (defined as the lowest PSA achieved) after radiotherapy with or without short-term hormonal therapy; appearance of metastasis or loco-regional recurrence (diagnosed by any imaging or biopsy); initiation of any new salvage therapy, or death from any cause. Discussion: This is the first randomized phase 3 prospective trial designed to determine whether PSMA PET molecular imaging can improve outcomes in patients with PCa who receive dRT. In this trial the incorporation of PSMA PET may improve the success rate of curative intent radiotherapy in two ways: to optimize patient selection and to personalizes the radiotherapy plan. Clinical trial registration: IND#147591, UCLA IRB #20-000378, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04457245. Clinical trial information: NCT04457245.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS138-TPS138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Hofman ◽  
Declan G. Murphy ◽  
Scott Williams ◽  
Tatenda Nzenza ◽  
Alan Herschtal ◽  
...  

TPS138 Background: Disease persistence or relapse following curative-intent surgery or radiotherapy of high-risk prostate cancer is not uncommon. This is attributable, in part, to a failure of accurate staging with diagnostic imaging being insensitive for detection of small volume metastatic disease. Prostate-specific-membrane-antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is a new whole body scanning technique that enables visualisation of prostate cancer with high sensitivity. The hypotheses of this study are that PSMA-PET/CT (a) has improved diagnostic accuracy compared to conventional imaging, (b) should be used as a first-line diagnostic test for staging, (c) the improved diagnostic accuracy will result in significant management impact and (d) provides economic benefits when incorporated into the management algorithm. Methods: This is a 300 patient phase III multi-centre randomized study of patients with untreated high-risk prostate cancer defined by Gleason grade group 3-5, PSA ≥ 20ng/ml or clinical stage ≥ T3. Patients are randomized to Gallium-68-PSMA11 PET/CT or conventional imaging, consisting of computer tomography of the abdomen/pelvis and bone scintigraphy with SPECT/CT. Patients with negative, equivocal or oligometastatic disease cross-over to receive the other imaging arm. The primary objective is to compare the accuracy of PSMA-PET/CT to conventional imaging for detecting nodal or distant metastatic disease. Accuracy is defined by a pre-defined “ground truth” scoring system incorporating histopathologic, imaging and clinical follow-up at six months post randomisation. Secondary objectives include comparing management impact, the number of equivocal studies, the incremental value of second-line imaging in patients who cross-over, health economics, radiation exposure, inter-observer agreement and safety of PSMA-PET/CT. Longer term follow-up will also assess the prognostic value of a negative PSMA-PET/CT. 294 of 300 (98%) patients randomised at time of abstract submission. Clinical trial information: 12617000005358.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeremie Calais ◽  
Shaojun Zhu ◽  
Nader Hirmas ◽  
Matthias Eiber ◽  
Boris Hadaschik ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Definitive radiation therapy (dRT) is an effective initial treatment of intermediate-risk (IR) and high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa). PSMA PET/CT is superior to standard of care imaging (CT, MRI, bone scan) for detecting regional and distant metastatic PCa. PSMA PET/CT thus has the potential to guide patient selection and the planning for dRT and improve patient outcomes. Methods This is a multicenter randomized phase 3 trial (NCT04457245). We will randomize 312 patients to proceed with standard dRT (control Arm, n = 150), or undergo a PSMA PET/CT scan at the study site (both 18F-DCFPyL and 68Ga-PSMA-11 can be used) prior to dRT planning (intervention arm, n = 162). dRT will be performed at the treating radiation oncologist facility. In the control arm, dRT will be performed as routinely planned. In the intervention arm, the treating radiation oncologist can incorporate PSMA PET/CT findings into the RT planning. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is administered per discretion of the treating radiation oncologist and may be modified as a result of the PSMA PET/CT results. We assume that approximately 8% of subjects randomized to the PSMA PET arm will be found to have M1 disease and thus will be more appropriate candidates for long-term systemic or multimodal therapy, rather than curative intent dRT. PET M1 patients will thus not be included in the primary endpoint analysis. The primary endpoint is the success rate of patients with unfavorable IR and HR PCa after standard dRT versus PSMA PET-based dRT. Secondary Endpoints (whole cohort) include progression free survival (PFS), metastasis-free survival after initiation of RT, overall survival (OS), % of change in initial treatment intent and Safety. Discussion This is the first randomized phase 3 prospective trial designed to determine whether PSMA PET/CT molecular imaging can improve outcomes in patients with PCa who receive dRT. In this trial the incorporation of PSMA PET/CT may improve the success rate of curative intent radiotherapy in two ways: to optimize patient selection as a biomarker and to personalizes the radiotherapy plan. Clinical trial registration UCLA IND#147591 ○ Submission: 02.27.2020 ○ Safe-to-proceed letter issued by FDA: 04.01.2020 UCLA IRB #20–000378 ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04457245. Date of Registry: 07.07.2020. Essen EudraCT 2020–003526-23


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. e576-e576
Author(s):  
Sumedha Chhatre ◽  
David Inkoo Lee ◽  
Doyeong Yu ◽  
S. Bruce Malkowicz ◽  
Ravishankar Jayadevappa

e576 Background: To determine the five year survival impact of primary surgery compared to radiation therapy in older men with high risk prostate cancer. Methods: This was a population-based cohort study using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare patients 66 years or older, diagnosed for prostate cancer between 2004 and 2008. High-risk prostate cancer was identified as Gleason score of ≥ 8, or clinical stage T3a. Treatments studied were definitive local (curative intent) therapy (surgery or radiation therapy) within 180 days of prostate cancer diagnosis. The two treatment groups were retrospectively followed for one-year pre and five years post diagnosis. Main outcome measure was five-year all-cause mortality and cancer specific mortality. Sequential Cox regression was used to assess the hazard of mortality associated with surgery, compared to radiation therapy, after adjusting for socio-demographic variables, variables and propensity score. Results: We identified a cohort of 24,838 men newly diagnosed for high-risk for prostate cancer between 2004 and 2008. Forty-seven percent of these had surgery (n = 11,696) as well as radiation therapy (n = 11,724) as a primary treatment with curative intent within 180 days of diagnosis. Mean age at diagnosis of radiation therapy group was higher compared to surgery group (73.5, sd = 5.3 vs. 70.3, sd = 4.9; p = 0.020). Radiation group had higher comorbidity compared to surgery group (37% vs. 26%, p = 0.0316). Unadjusted all-cause mortality comparison over five years of follow-up showed that surgery treatment was associated with lower mortality (HR = 0.58, CI = 0.54, 0.62). After adjusting for propensity score, the hazard of all-cause five year mortality remained lower for surgery compared to radiation therapy (HR = 0.86, CI = 0.78, 9.4). Conclusions: Over a five-year follow-up, primary surgery was associated with improved survival compared to radiation therapy in high-risk prostate cancer patients. Longer follow-up is needed to determine if the survival advantage of surgery will persist as well as factors contributing to the difference in survival.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 365-365
Author(s):  
Irving D. Kaplan ◽  
Limor Appelbaum ◽  
Nima Aghdam ◽  
Jarad Martin ◽  
Mark Sidhom ◽  
...  

365 Background: External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with androgen suppression (AS) and low dose rate (LDR)brachytherapy boost has been shown to improve biochemical progression free survival in unfavorable intermediate risk and high-risk prostate cancer (PC) compared to EBRT and AS. Excellent rates of local control in locally advanced prostate cancer with EBRT with high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR) boost. Prostate Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SBRT) may be an alternative to brachytherapy in patients with unfavorable intermediate and high-risk PC. Here we report the toxicity of pelvic lymph node/prostate EBRT and SBRT as the radiation boost in a large retrospective cohort. Methods: 473 patients with intermediate or high-risk PC, from the Radiosurgery Society Registry, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Georgetown University, and 5 Australian centers, were included. Patients received treatment from 3/2004- 9/2018 were the basis of this IRB approved retrospective study. The prostate and pelvis nodes were treated with between 36-50.4 Gy in 1.8/2.0 Gy fractions of radiation therapy EBRT. Patients received a SBRT boost to the prostate. Boost dose was 19-19.5 Gy (range 19-36.25 Gy). 274 and 199 patients presented with unfavorable or high-risk disease. The median follow-up was 33 months (IQR:18-63). Results: 33 deaths of 473 patients occurred in this cohort, 8 of which were caused by PC. There were 13.9% (n=66) acute Grade 1 or 2 GI toxicities (11.8% grade 1, 2.1% grade 2). There were 27.7% (n=131) acute Grade 1 or 2 GU toxicities (19.2% grade 1, 8.5% grade 2). No severe acute GU or GI toxicities were reported. There were 32 (6.8%) Grade 1 and 3 (0.6%) Grade 2 late GI toxicities. There were 9 (1.9%) Grade 3 and 1 (0.2%) Grade 4 late GI toxicities. There were 60 (12.7%) Grade 1 and 23 (4.9%) Grade 2 late GU toxicities. 15 (3.2%) Grade 3, but no Grade 4 late GU toxicity were reported. Conclusions: In this large multi-institutional retrospective cohort SBRT boost to pelvic/prostate EBRT had acceptable acute and late toxicities. The high dose per fraction of SBRT is similar to the dose delivered with HDR. This data raises the hypothesis that SBRT boost should be evaluated in additional clinical trials.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS264-TPS264
Author(s):  
Omar Alghazo ◽  
Renu Eapen ◽  
Nattakorn Dhiantravan ◽  
John A. Violet ◽  
Price Jackson ◽  
...  

TPS264 Background: High-risk localised prostate cancer (HRCaP) is treated by radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy. Despite curative intent, a significant number of men will progress with metastatic disease or local recurrence. Lutetium-177 radiolabelled to the small molecule PSMA-617 targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (Lu-PSMA) has proven efficacious in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have progressed after standard-of-care. The LuTectomy trial evaluates whether administration of Lu-PSMA before radical prostatectomy in men with HRCaP will deliver high doses of radiation to the prostate and involved lymph nodes. It also aims to assess the feasibility, safety profile and oncological efficacy of Lu-PSMA. Methods: Lutectomy is an open-label, phase I/II non-randomised clinical trial. 20 men with HRCaP defined by European Association of Urology who are scheduled for RP and pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) will be recruited. All men will have high PSMA-avidity with a standardised uptake value (SUVmax) of ≥ 20 on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. The initial 10 participants will receive one cycle of 5GBq Lu-PSMA intravenously and the latter 10 men will receive two cycles of 5GBq Lu-PSMA per cycle six weeks apart. RP with PLND will be performed six weeks later. Participants will be followed up for three years. The primary outcome is to determine the radiation absorbed dose in the prostate and involved lymph nodes. Three-time point quantitative single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT/CT) will be used to estimate radiation dosimetry using a voxelated technique incorporating partial volume correction. Marrow absorbed dose will also be evaluated using serial blood measures to model pharmacokinetic clearance with a multi-phase exponential model. Translational research samples will include the original biopsy, prostatectomy specimen and plasma/whole blood samples. Secondary objectives include evaluation of the PSMA PET/CT imaging response (defined by SUVmax decline >30%), PSA response, pathological response following Lu-PSMA, adverse effects of Lu-PSMA, surgical safety, and health-related quality of life. Post estimates for time-to-event endpoints will be estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The first patient was recruited in July 2020 and recruitment is expected to take up to two years. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04430192. Funding: Movember and Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF), Endocyte Inc., a Novartis Company, E.J. Whitten Foundation. Clinical trial information: NCT04430192.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document