Models of Cancer Survivorship Care: Overview and Summary of Current Evidence

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. e19-e27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael T. Halpern ◽  
Meera Viswanathan ◽  
Tammeka S. Evans ◽  
Sarah A. Birken ◽  
Ethan Basch ◽  
...  

There is substantial variation in survivorship care models. The authors conclude that the optimal nature, timing, intensity, format, and outcomes of survivorship care models are uncertain and require further research.

The Breast ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly C. Gast ◽  
Summer V. Allen ◽  
Kathryn J. Ruddy ◽  
Tufia C. Haddad

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6006-6006
Author(s):  
Winson Y. Cheung ◽  
Anne Michelle Noone ◽  
Noreen Aziz ◽  
Julia Howe Rowland ◽  
Arnold L. Potosky ◽  
...  

6006 Background: There is increasing interest in developing more efficient and effective strategies for coordinating and delivering cancer and non-cancer related follow-up care to survivors. The objectives of this nationwide survey were to describe and compare US physician preferences for different cancer survivorship care models. Methods: The Survey of Physician Attitudes Regarding the Care of Cancer Survivors (SPARCCS) was mailed to PCPs and oncologists in order to evaluate their views regarding physician responsibilities, knowledge levels about survivorship, and cancer follow-up testing. Using weighted univariate and multivariate models, we analyzed PCPs’ and oncologists’ preferences for different cancer survivorship care models (PCP/shared vs. oncologist vs. non-physician provider) and examined how physician attitudes towards and self-efficacy with their own skills during breast and colorectal cancer follow-up affected these preferences. Results: Of 3,434 physicians surveyed, 2,202 (64%) responded of whom 2,026 (59%) provided eligible outcomes for this study: 938 (46%) PCPs and 1,088 (54%) oncologists. In unadjusted analyses, most PCPs (51%) supported a PCP/shared care system whereas the majority of specialists (59%) strongly endorsed an oncologist-based model (p<0.001). A number of PCPs and oncologists (23% for both) preferred to involve non-physician providers. A significant proportion of cancer specialists (87%) did not feel that PCPs can take on the primary role for cancer follow-up. Many PCPs believed that they have the skills to perform breast and colorectal cancer follow-up (57%), detect recurrent cancers (74%), and offer psychosocial support (50%), but only a minority (32%) were willing to assume exclusive responsibility. In adjusted analyses, PCPs already involved with cancer surveillance (43%) were more likely to prefer a PCP/shared care system than an oncologist-based survivorship care model (OR 2.08, 95%CI 1.34-3.23, p<0.001). Conclusions: PCPs and oncologists have different preferences for models of cancer survivorship care. Prior involvement with cancer follow-up was one of the strongest predictors of PCPs' willingness to assume this responsibility.


2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-45
Author(s):  
Wai Yee Rose Fok ◽  
Kiley Wei-Jen Loh

Survivorship care is an essential component of high-quality cancer care due to rising cancer incidence, survival and the recognition of unique health challenges cancer survivors face. Primary care practitioners (PCP) have played pivotal roles in cancer survivorship in the community in first world settings, and current evidence suggest that PCPs can provide more cost-effective and equally safe surveillance care to cancer survivors with no difference in recurrence rates, time to detection of recurrence, mortality and health-related quality of life, compared to specialists. High quality survivorship care is best delivered using a collaborative approach between tertiary based specialists and community-based PCPs.


Author(s):  
Nerea Elizondo Rodriguez ◽  
Leire Ambrosio ◽  
Virginia La Rosa‐Salas ◽  
Marta Domingo‐Osle ◽  
Cristina Garcia‐Vivar

Author(s):  
Lava R. Timsina ◽  
Ben Zarzaur ◽  
David A. Haggstrom ◽  
Peter C. Jenkins ◽  
Maryam Lustberg ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document