scholarly journals Complications Associated With Use of Long-Term Central Venous Catheters Among Commercially Insured Women With Breast Cancer

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 505-510 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison Lipitz-Snyderman ◽  
Qinli Ma ◽  
Michael F. Pollack ◽  
John Barron ◽  
Elena B. Elkin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines

Long-term central venous catheter (CVC) use is associated with increased morbidity. Evidence-based guidelines tools may help decrease discretionary use of long-term CVCs resulting from provider- or institution-driven variations in practice.

A Stuck Hemodialysis Central venous Catheter

2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 301-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Field ◽  
J. Pugh ◽  
J. Asquith ◽  
S. Davies ◽  
A.D. Pherwani
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Vascular Access ◽  
Insertion Site ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Hemodialysis Patients ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous

Background A growing number of hemodialysis patients are dependent upon central venous catheters (CVCs) for long-term vascular access. Although many complications of CVCs have been documented, the phenomenon of the stuck catheter is described relatively infrequently. Case report We describe a case where attempts to remove the line by exploration of the jugular insertion site in theater were unsuccessful and the line was internalized. Discussion The case is then discussed with all available cases in the literature to suggest principles of managing and preventing the stuck catheter phenomenon.

Assessing the Quality of Central Venous Catheter and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Videos on the YouTube Video-Sharing Web site

2013 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 177-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Carr ◽  
Evan Alexandrou ◽  
Gavin M. Jackson ◽  
Timothy R. Spencer
Keyword(s):  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter ◽  
Central Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters ◽  
Video Sharing ◽  
Evidence Based Guidelines ◽  
Central Catheters

AbstractBackground: Video sharing networks such as YouTube have revolutionized communication. Whilst access is freely available uploaded videos can contain non peer-reviewed information. This has consequences for the scientific and health care community, when the challenge in teaching is to present clinical procedures that follow empirical methods.Objective: To review 50 central venous catheter and peripherally inserted central catheter videos posted on YouTube. The aim was to appraise these videos using current evidenced-based guidelines.Methods: We searched YouTube using the key words central venous cannulation and peripherally inserted central catheter insertion on September 21, 2012. We consecutively reviewed 50 videos for both procedures.Results: There was poor adherence to evidence-based guidelines in the critiqued videos. There was a difference in adherence with the use of appropriate skin antisepsis in the 2 groups (18% for central venous catheters vs 52% for peripherally inserted central catheters; p = 0.009). And a large proportion in both groups compromised aseptic technique (37% for central venous catheters vs 38% for peripherally inserted central catheter; p = 0.940). The use of ultrasound guidance during procedures was also different between the 2 groups (33% for central venous catheters vs 85% for peripherally inserted central catheters; p = 0.017).Conclusions: This critique of instructional videos related to the insertion of central venous catheters and peripherally inserted central catheters uploaded to YouTube has highlighted poor adherence to current evidence-based guidelines. This lack of adherence to empirical guidelines can pose risks to clinical learning and ultimately to patient safety.

A bedside rescue method for retrieving retained guidewires: The ‘Suck Out’ technique

2020 ◽  
pp. 112972982094345
Author(s):  
Maryanne Z A Mariyaselvam ◽  
Vikesh Patel ◽  
Adam Sawyer ◽  
James A Richardson ◽  
Jonathan Dean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Patient Harm ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Exact Test ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Never Event ◽  
Benchtop Model

Background: Central venous catheter guidewire retention is classed as a ‘never event’ in the United Kingdom, with the potential for significant patient harm. If the retained guidewire remains within the central venous catheter lumen, bedside techniques may facilitate guidewire retrieval. However, these techniques may be ineffective if the guidewire has already passed below skin level. We investigated a novel ‘suck out’ technique for bedside guidewire retrieval and compared this against traditional retrieval methods. Methods: Simulation 1: in a benchtop model, seven different central venous catheters had their corresponding guidewire placed in the last 2 cm of the catheter tip which was immersed horizontally in fluid. A 50-mL syringe was attached to the distal lumen central venous catheter hub and suction applied for 5 s, and the distance of guidewire retraction was recorded. Simulation 2: a central venous catheter guidewire was intentionally retained within the catheter at either 5 cm above or below skin level in a pigskin model. Simple catheter withdrawal, catheter clamping withdrawal and the ‘suck out’ method were compared for efficacy using Fisher’s exact test. Results: Simulation 1: retained guidewires were retracted by 13 cm on average. Simulation 2: when guidewires were retained 5 cm above skin level, all retrieval methods were 100% effective; however, when retained 5 cm below skin level, simple catheter withdrawal was ineffective, clamping and withdrawal was only 10% effective and the ‘suck out’ technique was 90% effective (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The ‘suck out’ technique can effectively retract guidewires retained within central venous catheter lumens and demonstrates superiority over traditional methods of retained guidewire extraction in simulated models.

Precision in Central Venous Catheter Tip Placement: A Review of the Literature

2010 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 112-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell Hostetter ◽  
Nadine Nakasawa ◽  
Kim Tompkins ◽  
Bradley Hill
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Selection Criteria ◽  
Weighted Average ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
Landmark Technique ◽  
The Ideal

Abstract Background: Long term venous catheters have been used to deliver specialized therapies since 1968. The ideal tip position of a central venous catheter provides reliable venous access with optimal therapeutic delivery, while minimizing short-and long-term complications. Ideal position limits have evolved and narrowed over time, making successful placement difficult and unreliable when depending exclusively on the landmark technique. Objective: To review and analyze contemporary literature and calculate an overall accuracy rate for first attempt placement of a PICC catheter in the ideal tip position. Methods: Key PICC placement terms were used to search the database PubMED-indexed for MEDLINE in June and October, 2009. The selection of studies required: a patient cohort without tip placement guidance technology; a documented landmark technique to place catheter tips; data documenting initial catheter placement and, that the lower third of the SVC and the cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) were included in the placement criteria. With few exceptions, articles written between 1993 and 2009 met the stated selection criteria. A composite of outcomes associated with tip placement was analyzed, and an overall percent proficiency of accurate catheter tip placement calculated. Results: Nine studies in eight articles met the selection criteria and were included for analysis. Rates of first placement success per study ranged from 39% to 75%, with the majority (7/9) being single center studies. The combined overall proficiency of these studies calculated as a weighted average was 45.87%.

Risk factor identification and predictive models for central line requirements for patients on vasopressors

2021 ◽  
pp. 0310057X2110242
Author(s):  
Adrian D Haimovich ◽  
Ruoyi Jiang ◽  
Richard A Taylor ◽  
Justin B Belsky
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Composite Endpoint ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheters ◽  
Central Venous

Vasopressors are ubiquitous in intensive care units. While central venous catheters are the preferred route of infusion, recent evidence suggests peripheral administration may be safe for short, single-agent courses. Here, we identify risk factors and develop a predictive model for patient central venous catheter requirement using the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care, a single-centre dataset of patients admitted to an intensive care unit between 2008 and 2019. Using prior literature, a composite endpoint of prolonged single-agent courses (>24 hours) or multi-agent courses of any duration was used to identify likely central venous catheter requirement. From a cohort of 69,619 intensive care unit stays, there were 17,053 vasopressor courses involving one or more vasopressors that met study inclusion criteria. In total, 3807 (22.3%) vasopressor courses involved a single vasopressor for less than six hours, 7952 (46.6%) courses for less than 24 hours and 5757 (33.8%) involved multiple vasopressors of any duration. Of these, 3047 (80.0%) less than six-hour and 6423 (80.8%) less than 24-hour single vasopressor courses used a central venous catheter. Logistic regression models identified associations between the composite endpoint and intubation (odds ratio (OR) 2.36, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.16 to 2.58), cardiac diagnosis (OR 0.72, CI 0.65 to 0.80), renal impairment (OR 1.61, CI 1.50 to 1.74), older age (OR 1.002, Cl 1.000 to 1.005) and vital signs in the hour before initiation (heart rate, OR 1.006, CI 1.003 to 1.009; oxygen saturation, OR 0.996, CI 0.993 to 0.999). A logistic regression model predicting the composite endpoint had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (standard deviation) of 0.747 (0.013) and an accuracy of 0.691 (0.012). This retrospective study reveals a high prevalence of short vasopressor courses in intensive care unit settings, a majority of which were administered using central venous catheters. We identify several important risk factors that may help guide clinicians deciding between peripheral and central venous catheter administration, and present a predictive model that may inform future prospective trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document