Development of non-regulatory runtime respirable coal and silica dust monitor

2021 ◽  
pp. 242-247
Author(s):  
C.C. Harb ◽  
R.D. Rajapaksha ◽  
X. Moya ◽  
J. Roberts ◽  
P. Hemp ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 28-31
Author(s):  
L.J.Bhagia L.J.Bhagia ◽  
◽  
S.L.Dodia S.L.Dodia ◽  
M.I. Shaikh M.I. Shaikh

2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (11) ◽  
pp. 3439-3442 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.N. Kraus ◽  
T.R. Naik ◽  
B.W. Ramme ◽  
Rakesh Kumar

2008 ◽  
Vol 29 (06) ◽  
pp. 651-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Cohen ◽  
Aiyub Patel ◽  
Francis Green
Keyword(s):  

AIHA Journal ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
pp. 319-328 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Ellen Flanagan ◽  
Noah Seixas ◽  
Maria Majar ◽  
Janice Camp ◽  
Michael Morgan
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Hendrix

<p>With the Artemis mission set to launch in 2024, returning humans to the lunar surface for the first time in over half a century, it is imperative to ensure human health and safety on a variety of fronts. Lunar dust exposure is one of many areas of concern regarding astronaut health and safety. During the Apollo missions it was reported that lunar dust was a nuisance and induced allergic-like symptoms upon exposure. In addition, it was also reported that instruments became coated with dust that was difficult to remove, and that the dust adhered to everything and tore through space suit fabric. Numerous inhalation studies have determined that lunar dust is more toxic than analogous terrestrial materials but less so than silica dust. Apollo dust mitigation systems were successful on some missions but failed on others. As humans are to stay on the lunar surface for extended periods relative to the Apollo missions, it is vital to fabricate instruments that would address the lunar dust problem with greater reliability. There must be multiple steps to remove all lunar dust, including the ultra-fine <10 µm fraction which was the most difficult dust size to remove. There must be multiple steps regarding lunar dust removal including a chamber to remove dust and de-suit, and a vacuum with high level HEPA filtration to remove dust. The first chamber would be to filter out any dust that comes into the module from the outside. Once all the air is clear, then the next step would be to remove any remaining dust on the suits using a hand-held vacuum with a HEPA H14 filter which only allows up to a maximum 0.005% of particles 100 nm in size to pass through the filter. Then, it would be safe to de-suit. It would be wise to have a second chamber between the first chamber and the command center of the lunar module that would vacuum any remaining dust before opening to the main command chamber. Ultra-high quality HEPA filters of both the chamber and hand-held vacuum systems should be replaced frequently to maintain optimal dust mitigation. Investing time and resources into lunar dust mitigation should be a top priority for the upcoming Artemis mission to avoid the issues encountered on the Apollo missions.</p>


2021 ◽  
pp. 074823372110394
Author(s):  
Yujing Zhang ◽  
Shuai Huang ◽  
Shiyi Tan ◽  
Mingke Chen ◽  
Shang Yang ◽  
...  

Occupational exposure to silica dust is related to pulmonary inflammation and silicosis. Lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) could aggravate apoptosis in alveolar macrophages (AMs) of human silicosis through autophagy, yet how the reduction of autophagy attenuated LPS-induced lung injury and the related mechanisms need to be investigated. In the study, we aim to understand the role of 3-methyladenine (3-MA), an inhibitor of autophagy, in LPS-mediated inflammatory responses and fibrosis. We collected AMs from observers/silicosis patients. The results showed that LPS induced NF-κB-related pulmonary inflammation in observers and silicosis patients, as confirmed by an increase in the expression of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and p65, which could be inhibited by 3-MA treatment. In mice models, at the early stage (7d) of silicosis, but not the late (28d) stage, blocking autophagy reversed the increased levels of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, and p65 caused by LPS. Mechanism study revealed that LPS triggered the expression of LC3 II, p62, and cleaved caspase-3 at the early stage exposed to silica, which could be restored by 3-MA, while there was no difference in the expression of LAMP1 either at the early or late stage of silicosis in different groups. Similarly, 3-MA treatment did not prevent fibrosis characterized by destroyed alveoli, collagen deposition, and increased expression of α-SMA and Col-1 induced by LPS at the late stage of silicosis. The results suggested that 3-MA has a role in the protection of lung injury at the early stage of silicosis and provided an experimental basis for preventive strategies of pulmonary inflammation and silicosis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document