Organic Friction Modifiers

2017 ◽  
pp. 87-98
Author(s):  
Dick Kenbeck ◽  
Thomas F. Bunemann
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
E. A. Gallardo Hernandez ◽  
J. Cotter ◽  
R. Lewis ◽  
D. T. Eadie

Train detection, for signalling purposes, is often by means of track circuits. Signalling block occupancy is triggered by the wheelset of the train ‘shorting out’ the track circuit, i.e. the wheels and axle act as a shunt. Contamination on the track such as ballast dust, rust, oil, or leaves as well as substances designed to improve train operation such as friction modifiers or sand may cause the contact between the wheelsets and the track to be compromised, inhibiting train identification. In previous work a twin disc approach has been used to study the effect of sand (used to improve adhesion) and leaves on wheel/rail isolation. Friction modifiers are of significant current interest in wheel/rail research. Introducing a new material into the tread/top of rail interface can raise questions about the impact on signalling systems. Although no significant effects have been observed in practical operation on a range of railway systems, the intention in this work was to evaluate conductance between wheel and rail in a more controlled and systematic fashion using the previously established methodology. Using the twin disc technique, friction modifier, in the form of a solid stick, was applied using a spring loaded device to the rotating wheel disc to generate a visible film. Tests were run to measure contact impedance at typical loads and slips. Static tests were also carried out using discs pre-conditioned with a friction modifier film. The electrical circuit used was a modified simplified simulation of audio frequency track circuit. No significant difference was observed in the measured impedance for dry conditions with no friction modifier, versus tests where friction modifier was applied, regardless of percentage slip or input voltage. The analysis suggests that the introduction of friction modifier into the existing wheel/rail interfacial film does not result in increased impedance with all other factors being equal.


2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 415-420 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. G. Goryacheva ◽  
S. M. Zakharov ◽  
A. P. Krasnov ◽  
A. S. Yudin ◽  
E. V. Torskaya ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 61 (12) ◽  
pp. 723-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sharmishtha Khalkar ◽  
DiptiNarayan Bhowmick ◽  
Amit Pratap

2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 103-109
Author(s):  
Go Tatsumi ◽  
Shinji Hasegawa ◽  
Yasushi Onumata

2019 ◽  
Vol 123 (22) ◽  
pp. 13672-13680 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prathima C. Nalam ◽  
Alex Pham ◽  
R. Veronica Castillo ◽  
Rosa M. Espinosa-Marzal

Author(s):  
M Harmon ◽  
R Lewis

Test methodologies originally developed for greases have been adapted to be used for top of rail friction modifiers (TORFMs). This has included: a small-scale benchtop tribometer to measure the tackiness of different TORFMs, attaching an applicator bar to a section of rail and rolling a scaled-wheel through the TORFM applied to the rail head to analyse the effect of different variables on pick-up, and applying TORFM to a full-scale test facility to analyse the scaling effects and the effect of slip, load and speed on pick-up. These methods can be used to measure the relative performance of different TORFMs with respect to how much product is picked up by the wheel. The results have shown that the relative ranking of different TORFMs is the same across the three test scales. This shows that these small-scale test methods that are more suitable for inclusion in test standards could be used to reduce the need for the more time-consuming and expensive larger scale tests, as the relative performance is the same.


2019 ◽  
Vol 799 ◽  
pp. 59-64
Author(s):  
Igor Velkavrh ◽  
Stefan Klien ◽  
Joel Voyer ◽  
Florian Ausserer ◽  
Alexander Diem

In the present study, static coefficients of friction of pure and friction modified (FM) polyamide 6 (PA6) polymers against primer-coated steel surfaces were investigated under a series of nominal contact pressures and by considering the influences of water absorption by the polymer, temperature, counter-body surface roughness and lubrication conditions. Under the majority of the test conditions investigated, FM PA6 exhibited lower static friction than pure PA6. Under unlubricated conditions, this was due to the low adhesion of the FM PA6 provided by its friction modifying inclusions; while under lubricated conditions, a combination of softening due to water absorption and decreased adhesion provided by its friction modifiers enabled lower static friction, especially at medium and high contact pressures.


2020 ◽  
Vol 310 ◽  
pp. 113200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankit Kotia ◽  
Krishna Chowdary ◽  
Isha Srivastava ◽  
Subrata Kumar Ghosh ◽  
Mohamed Kamal Ahmed Ali

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document