IMPACT PREDICTION

2018 ◽  
pp. 163-198
Keyword(s):  
2008 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 381-390 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pezhman Roudgarmi ◽  
Masoud Monavari ◽  
Jahangir Feghhi ◽  
Jafar Nouri ◽  
Nematollah Khorasani

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 514 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Zhou ◽  
Nihanth Cherukuru ◽  
Xiaoyu Sun ◽  
Ronald Calhoun

Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 601
Author(s):  
Nelson K. Dumakor-Dupey ◽  
Sampurna Arya ◽  
Ankit Jha

Rock fragmentation in mining and construction industries is widely achieved using drilling and blasting technique. The technique remains the most effective and efficient means of breaking down rock mass into smaller pieces. However, apart from its intended purpose of rock breakage, throw, and heave, blasting operations generate adverse impacts, such as ground vibration, airblast, flyrock, fumes, and noise, that have significant operational and environmental implications on mining activities. Consequently, blast impact studies are conducted to determine an optimum blast design that can maximize the desirable impacts and minimize the undesirable ones. To achieve this objective, several blast impact estimation empirical models have been developed. However, despite being the industry benchmark, empirical model results are based on a limited number of factors affecting the outcomes of a blast. As a result, modern-day researchers are employing machine learning (ML) techniques for blast impact prediction. The ML approach can incorporate several factors affecting the outcomes of a blast, and therefore, it is preferred over empirical and other statistical methods. This paper reviews the various blast impacts and their prediction models with a focus on empirical and machine learning methods. The details of the prediction methods for various blast impacts—including their applications, advantages, and limitations—are discussed. The literature reveals that the machine learning methods are better predictors compared to the empirical models. However, we observed that presently these ML models are mainly applied in academic research.


IEEE Access ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 75124-75131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Mehrpour Bernety ◽  
Suresh Venkatesh ◽  
David Schurig

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liron Ganel ◽  
Haley J Abel ◽  
Ira M Hall

Motivation: Structural variation (SV) is an important and diverse source of human genome variation. Over the past several years, much progress has been made in the area of SV detection, but predict-ing the functional impact of SVs discovered in whole genome sequencing (WGS) studies remains extremely challenging. Accurate SV impact prediction is especially important for WGS-based rare variant association studies and studies of rare disease. Results: Here we present SVScore, a computational tool for in silico SV impact prediction. SVScore aggregates existing per-base single nucleotide polymorphism pathogenicity scores across relevant genomic intervals for each SV in a manner that considers variant type, gene features, and uncertainty in breakpoint location. We show that in a Finnish cohort, the allele frequency spectrum of SVs with high impact scores is strongly skewed toward lower frequencies, suggesting that these variants are under purifying selection. We further show that SVScore identifies deleterious variants more effectively than naive alternative methods. Finally, our results indicate that high-scoring tandem duplications may be under surprisingly strong selection relative to high-scoring deletions, suggesting that duplications may be more deleterious than previously thought. In conclusion, SVScore provides pathogenicity prediction for SVs that is both informative and meaningful for understanding their functional role in disease. Availability: SVScore is implemented in Perl and available freely at {{http://www.github.com/lganel/SVScore}} for use under the MIT license. Contact: [email protected]


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document