Analytical Reconstruction Methods in X-ray Computed Tomography

2017 ◽  
pp. 669-692
Author(s):  
Daniele Panetta
2015 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 2663-2670
Author(s):  
P. Matysik ◽  
M. Chojnacki ◽  
S. Jóźwiak ◽  
T. Czujko ◽  
S. Lipiński

In this paper the possibility of using X-ray computed tomography (CT) in quantitative metallographic studies of homogeneous and composite materials is presented. Samples of spheroidal cast iron, Fe-Ti powder mixture compact and epoxy composite reinforced with glass fibers, were subjected to comparative structural tests. Volume fractions of each of the phase structure components were determined by conventional methods with the use of a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) quantitative analysis methods. These results were compared with those obtained by the method of spatial analysis of the reconstructed CT image. Based on the comparative analysis, taking into account the selectivity of data verification methods and the accuracy of the obtained results, the authors conclude that the method of computed tomography is suitable for quantitative analysis of several types of structural materials.


Proceedings ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 4
Author(s):  
Camille Chapdelaine ◽  
Ali Mohammad-Djafari ◽  
Nicolas Gac ◽  
Estelle Parra

3D X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) is used in medicine and non-destructive testing (NDT) for industry to visualize the interior of a volume and control its healthiness. Compared to analytical reconstruction methods, model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) methods obtain high-quality reconstructions while reducing the dose. Nevertheless, usual Maximum-A-Posteriori (MAP) estimation does not enable to quantify the uncertainties on the reconstruction, which can be useful for the control performed afterwards. Herein, we propose to estimate these uncertainties jointly with the reconstruction by computing Posterior Mean (PM) thanks to Variational Bayesian Approach (VBA). We present our reconstruction algorithm using a Gauss-Markov-Potts prior model on the volume to reconstruct. For PM calculation in VBA, the uncertainties on the reconstruction are given by the variances of the posterior distribution of the volume. To estimate these variances in our algorithm, we need to compute diagonal coefficients of the posterior covariance matrix. Since this matrix is not available in 3D X-ray CT, we propose an efficient solution to tackle this difficulty, based on the use of a matched pair of projector and backprojector. In our simulations using the Separable Footprint (SF) pair, we compare our PM estimation with MAP estimation. Perspectives for this work are applications to real data as improvement of our GPU implementation of SF pair.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carianne Martinez ◽  
John P. Korbin ◽  
Kevin Matthew Potter ◽  
Emily Donahue ◽  
Jeremy David Gamet ◽  
...  

1999 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 199-211
Author(s):  
J. M. Winter ◽  
R. E. Green ◽  
A. M. Waters ◽  
W. H. Green

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document