Small-Item and Flatware Apparel Pick and Pack Activities

Keyword(s):  
PMLA ◽  
1952 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 446-472
Author(s):  
Frances H. Ellis
Keyword(s):  

The Munich codex germanicus 6353 ends with the following words:Das gesilbent par / ist durch Hannsen Foltznvonn Wormbs Barbierern zu Nurmberggemacht vnnd gedichtet Jacoben BernhaubtSchwennter benant / jme jn grosser gunstvnnd liebe zugestellt / doch vmb sein darbe-zalunng vnnd ist jm 1496 Jarnngesunngen durch angezaigtennSchwentern auff der singeschulvmb ein klainoth / Es ist jmvnbekanten thon vndsaget von den sibenfryen kunst-en jtlich-erIr erfinder / Planeth / farb / methall (fol. Zr)To a casual reader these lines might seem to belong to the preceding poem in the MS., but a closer look proves this to be impossible. Indeed a seven-staved par such as described in the above lines is not to be found anywhere within the entire codex. In vain does one look in Mayer's edition of the MS. for some explanation. There the impression is added as if the lines were taken from the bottom of folio 168v, whereas actually they begin at the top of folio Zr and cover two-thirds of it, Apparently Mayer attached no significance to this fact, nor to the fact that blank folios follow the lines cited above (possibly because there are other blank folios scattered throughout the MS.), nor to the fact that the Schwennter referred to in the above “conclusion” is also mentioned in the Preface to the codex. He does, however, call attention to the very artistic handwriting of folios F, O, and Z, the folios which contain the prefatory material and the lines under consideration. Since the Preface states that Folz composed, wrote down, and then left behind him the poems in the MS. many years ago and that Jacob Bernhaubt Schwennter, named the Elder, likewise many years ago, spent much of his time singing and reading these same poems, and since the hand that made those statements also set down the final lines in Munich 6353, we may deduce that they were added after the death of Hans Folz. Even this small item has not been noted before, except for A. v. Keller's remark in his brief description of the Munich MS. that the closing lines, like the Preface, were von späterer hand. Rufold Henß, one of the investigators of Folz's style, appears to be the only scholar who saw something odd in the close of the Munich MS. Finding the words perplexing, he thought that they probably did not belong in that particular place and that they had been copied there by mistake. To date, therefore, no solution has been offered for this enigmatic ending.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hesham K. Alfares ◽  
Omar G. Alsawafy

This article presents a new model and an efficient solution algorithm for a bi-objective one-dimensional cutting-stock problem. In the cutting-stock—or trim-loss—problem, customer orders of different smaller item sizes are satisfied by cutting a number of larger standard-size objects. After cutting larger objects to satisfy orders for smaller items, the remaining parts are considered as useless or wasted material, which is called “trim-loss.” The two objectives of the proposed model, in the order of priority, are to minimize the total trim loss, and the number of partially cut large objects. To produce near-optimum solutions, a two-stage least-loss algorithm (LLA) is used to determine the combinations of small item sizes that minimize the trim loss quantity. Solving a real-life industrial problem as well as several benchmark problems from the literature, the algorithm demonstrated considerable effectiveness in terms of both objectives, in addition to high computational efficiency.


Weed Science ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 369-371 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Armstrong ◽  
J. K. Leasure ◽  
Mitchell R. Corbin

The problem in determining the economic feasibility of mechanical, chemical, and combination weed control methods in corn (Zea mays L.) is a complex decision involving many factors. The effects of cost, yield, timeliness, and alternative uses of labor are the factors considered in comparing various methods of weed control in this study. Costs of weed control operations range from $2.84/A for two cultivations to $10.45/A for the most intensive, mechanical-chemical operation studied. Most common weed control methods have costs of approximately $3 to $4/A. Yields range from 83 bu/A for two cultivations to 96 bu/A with the highest cost chemical-mechanical weed control methods. All yields used in this study are supported by agronomic studies and are indexed on the basis of 100 bu/A for weed-free conditions. The consideration of both yields and costs does affect the selection of a weed control method. Considering only these two factors, mechanical methods have a slight advantage over chemical weed control methods. Penalizing mechanical methods because of delay or timeliness characteristics gives chemical methods an advantage by as much as $3.00/A. Alternative uses of labor, even though a common argument in selecting chemical or mechanical methods, is a very small item and has only moderate effects on the changes in net income.


Aviation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 177-181
Author(s):  
Thomas Dautermann ◽  
Thomas Ludwig

Instrument approaches to non- instrument runways were made possible by the new approach classification of ICAO. As a conservative solution, the procedure design guidelines by the national civil aviation authorities apply circling minima to those approaches to non-instrument runways. However, the classification as non-instrument runway is very binary. Often a small item causes a reduction from instrument to a non-instrument runway and the circling minima become thus very conservative. Here, two cases are shown, Payerne, a non-instrument runway, and Ouessant with an instrument runway, both equipped very differently but both serving Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) traffic. Solutions for Payerne and other similarly highly equipped non-instrument runways are proposed in order to be able to accommodate at least non-precision minima.


Author(s):  
GERTJAN J. BURGHOUTS

The bag-of-features model is a distinctive and robust approach to detect human actions in videos. The discriminative power of this model relies heavily on the quantization of the video features into visual words. The quantization determines how well the visual words describe the human action. Random forests have proven to efficiently transform the features into distinctive visual words. A major disadvantage of the random forest is that it makes binary decisions on the feature values, and thus not taking into account uncertainties of the values. We propose a soft-assignment random forest, which is a generalization of the random forest, by substitution of the binary decisions inside the tree nodes by a sigmoid function. The slope of the sigmoid models the degree of uncertainty about a feature's value. The results demonstrate that the soft-assignment random forest improves significantly the action detection accuracy compared to the original random forest. The human actions that are hard to detect — because they involve interactions with or manipulations of some (typically small) item — are structurally improved. Most prominent improvements are reported for a person handing, throwing, dropping, hauling, taking, closing or opening some item. Improvements are achieved for the state-of-the-art on the IXMAS and UT-Interaction datasets by using the soft-assignment random forest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document