Methodological, Developmental, and Sex Biases in the Social Self-Esteem Test?

1980 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
David W. Mann
1978 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 699-702 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. W. Strümpfer

First, middle, and last names were rated on 5-point scales. Self-esteem was measured on the Ziller Social Self-esteem, the Bills Index of Adjustment and Values, and the Coopersmith Self-esteem Inventory. Subjects were 93 male and 73 female students in first- and second-year psychology. Subjects generally liked their names, with middle names disliked most often. Males liked their last names significantly more than their middle names, while females liked their last names more than either their first or middle names. Attitudes toward first name were related to some Bills and Coopersmith scores, which reflect subjects' appraisal of their worthiness and their style of responding to themselves, but not to Ziller scores, which reflect self-evaluation within a social context. Attitudes toward middle name were not reliably related to any self-esteem scores. In the female sample, attitudes toward the last name showed a relationship to self-esteem in the social context; no other correlations with attitudes toward last name were significant.


1986 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
pp. 663-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stacey D. Callahan ◽  
Aline H. Kidd

Research shows that women both focus on the social aspects of jobs and rate their self-esteem on social factors, so it was hypothesized that women scoring high on a job-satisfaction questionnaire would score significantly higher on those scales of the Adjective Check List which are relevant to self-esteem than women scoring low in job-satisfaction. The results supported the hypothesis. Job-satisfied women were achievement-oriented, cooperative, tactful, social, self-confident, and comfortable with sex-appropriate roles. Job-unsatisfied women were self-critical, suffered from inferiority feelings, and displayed maladaptive tendencies. Further research was suggested.


1986 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-109
Author(s):  
Gaston-R De Grâce ◽  
Purushottam Joshi

The present research studies the level of self-esteem, loneliness and depression in a sample of unemployed university graduates, taking into consideration the duration of unemployment. Thus, the subjects are divided into three groups: recently unemployed (1 month and less), moderately unemployed (6-7 months), and chronically unemployed (11-12 months). The instruments used are The Social Self-Esteem Inventory, The U.C.L.A. Loneliness Scale, and the Beck Depression Scale. The results show that the level of self-esteem is significantly lower for the chronically unemployed as compared to the recently unemployed. On the other hand, loneliness is significantly greater for chronically unemployed than for recently unemployed. Finally, depression is significantly greater for the moderate group as compared to the recent one, and for chronically unemployed than for the recently unemployed. The results for the unemployed university graduates are significantly different from those obtained from non graduates on two variables: the recently unemployed graduates have a greater self-esteem than recently unemployed non graduates. Moreover, the chronically unemployed graduates experience more depression as compared to their non graduate counterparts.


2016 ◽  
Vol 37 (2) ◽  
pp. 236-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mimi Tatlow-Golden ◽  
Suzanne Guerin

Self-concept research in early adolescence typically measures young people’s self-perceptions of competence in specific, adult-defined domains. However, studies have rarely explored young people’s own views of valued self-concept factors and their meanings. For two major self domains, the active and the social self, this mixed-methods study identified factors valued most by 526 young people from socioeconomically diverse backgrounds in Ireland (10-12 years), and explored the meanings associated with these in a stratified subsample ( n = 99). Findings indicate that self-concept scales for early adolescence omit active and social self factors and meanings valued by young people, raising questions about content validity of scales in these domains. Findings also suggest scales may under-represent girls’ active and social selves; focus too much on some school-based competencies; and, in omitting intrinsically salient self domains and meanings, may focus more on contingent (extrinsic) rather than true (intrinsic) self-esteem.


2004 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 915-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara L. Gruenewald ◽  
Margaret E. Kemeny ◽  
Najib Aziz ◽  
John L. Fahey
Keyword(s):  

1979 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 803-811 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.S. Lawson ◽  
W.L. Marshall ◽  
P. McGrath
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Irina Plotka ◽  
Nina Blumenau ◽  
Elena Ozola ◽  
Svetlana Pogildjakova ◽  
Jelena Drozdova

Research aim is to investigate self-esteem of young people, using Single-Category Implicit Association Tests (SC-IAT) and self-reported procedures. Research questions: Are there differences between effects of implicit self-associations: performance, social, appearance and general? What factors can describe a set of measured implicit and explicit variables, characterizing self-esteem? Are the results of implicit and explicit measurements independent from each other? What are the features of the contribution of explicit global self-esteem, state self-esteem (performance, social, appearance) and implicit self-associations (performance, social, appearance) into the implicit general self-associations? Is there the compliance of measurement results of self-esteem obtained with SC-IAT and self-reported procedures? Method: Participants – 132, age 18-30 years (M=25.4, SD=4.0). Implicit measures: Modified versions of SC-IAT: SC-IAT_1 (Performance self-associations, D(P)), SC-IAT_2 (Social self-associations, D(S)), SC-IAT_3 (Appearance self-associations, D(A)), SC-IAT_4 (General self-associations, D(SA)), developed on the basis of SC-IAT. Explicit measures: Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and State Self-Esteem Scale by Heatherton and Polivy. Results: Partial correspondence of measurements’ results using IAT and self-reported procedures was found. It was found that the main contribution to the General self-associations is made by the Social self-associations, Appearance self-associations and Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem. The results of implicit and explicit measurements are independent from each other.


1989 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 450-451
Author(s):  
William P. Smith

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document