Excess Mortality Among Hospitalized Patients With Hypopituitarism—A Population-Based, Matched-Cohort Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 105 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fahim Ebrahimi ◽  
Alexander Kutz ◽  
Ulrich Wagner ◽  
Ben Illigens ◽  
Timo Siepmann ◽  
...  

Abstract Context Patients with hypopituitarism face excess mortality in the long-term outpatient setting. However, associations of pituitary dysfunction with outcomes in acutely hospitalized patients are lacking. Objective The objective of this work is to assess clinical outcomes of hospitalized patients with hypopituitarism with or without diabetes insipidus (DI). Design, Setting, and Patients In this population-based, matched-cohort study from 2012 to 2017, hospitalized adult patients with a history of hypopituitarism were 1:1 propensity score–matched with a general medical inpatient cohort. Main Outcome Measures The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included all-cause readmission rates within 30 days and 1 year, intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates, and length of hospital stay. Results After matching, 6764 cases were included in the study. In total, 3382 patients had hypopituitarism and of those 807 (24%) suffered from DI. All-cause in-hospital mortality occurred in 198 (5.9%) of patients with hypopituitarism and in 164 (4.9%) of matched controls (odds ratio [OR] 1.32, [95% CI, 1.06-1.65], P = .013). Increased mortality was primarily observed in patients with DI (OR 3.69 [95% CI, 2.44-5.58], P < .001). Patients with hypopituitarism had higher ICU admissions (OR 1.50 [95% CI, 1.30-1.74], P < .001), and faced a 2.4-day prolonged length of hospitalization (95% CI, 1.94–2.95, P < .001) compared to matched controls. Risk of 30-day (OR 1.31 [95% CI, 1.13-1.51], P < .001) and 1-year readmission (OR 1.29 [95% CI, 1.17-1.42], P < .001) was higher among patients with hypopituitarism as compared with medical controls. Conclusions Patients with hypopituitarism are highly vulnerable once hospitalized for acute medical conditions with increased risk of mortality and adverse clinical outcomes. This was most pronounced among those with DI.

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1716-1722 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kao-Chih Hsu ◽  
Chia-Hung Sun ◽  
Yin-Yin Wu ◽  
Liang-Cheng Chen ◽  
Yung-Tsan Wu ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
pp. 429-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsien-Yi Chiu ◽  
Wei-Lun Chang ◽  
Weng-Foung Huang ◽  
Yu-Wen Wen ◽  
Yi-Wen Tsai ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (5) ◽  
pp. 903-910.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hsien-Yi Chiu ◽  
I-Ting Wang ◽  
Weng-Foung Huang ◽  
Yi-Wen Tsai ◽  
Ming-Neng Shiu ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 257 ◽  
pp. 14-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chien-Yu Lin ◽  
Fung-Wei Chang ◽  
Jing-Jung Yang ◽  
Chun-Hung Chang ◽  
Chia-Lun Yeh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 126 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lovisa Röjler ◽  
John J. Garber ◽  
Bjorn Roelstraete ◽  
Marjorie M. Walker ◽  
Jonas F. Ludvigsson

Background: There is a lack of knowledge about mortality in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Therefore, this study aimed to examine the mortality in EoE. Methods: A nationwide, population-based matched cohort study was conducted of all EoE patients in Sweden diagnosed between July 2005 and December 2017. Individuals with EoE (n = 1,625) were identified through prospectively recorded histopathology codes from all gastrointestinal pathology reports in Sweden, representing 28 pathology departments (the ESPRESSO study). Each individual with EoE was then matched with up to five reference individuals from the general population (n = 8,003) for age, sex, year of birth, and place of residence. We used the Cox proportional hazard modeling to estimate the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) while adjusting for other potential confounders. In sensitivity analyses, mortality in EoE patients was compared with mortality in their siblings. Results: Through December 2017, 34 deaths were confirmed in EoE patients (4.60 per 1,000 person-years) compared with 165 in reference individuals (4.57 per 1,000 person-years). This rate corresponds to an aHR of 0.97 (95% CI = 0.67–1.40). HRs were similar in males (aHR = 1.00 [0.66–1.51]) and females (aHR = 0.92 [0.38–2.18]). We observed no increased risk in mortality due to esophageal or other gastrointestinal cancers in patients with EoE (aHR = 1.02 [0.51–2.02]). Mortality was similar in EoE patients and their siblings (aHR = 0.91 [0.44–1.85]). Conclusion: In this nationwide, population-based matched cohort study in Sweden, there was no increased risk of death in patients with EoE compared with their siblings and the general population.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document