scholarly journals Laterality Diagnosis of Adrenal Vein Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism Using Aldosterone Alone

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. A291-A291
Author(s):  
Norio Wada ◽  
Shuhei Baba ◽  
Hajime Sugawara ◽  
Arina Miyoshi ◽  
Shinji Obara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Roc Analysis ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Acth Stimulation ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
Lateralization Index

Abstract Background: In adrenal vein sampling (AVS) for primary aldosteronism (PA), cortisol concentration is used to determine successful AVS, and laterality diagnosis is performed using a combination of aldosterone and cortisol concentrations. In this study, we examined the comparison with the conventional method when AVS was determined by aldosterone alone. Subjects and methods: We studied the data from 277 patients with PA who underwent AVS in Sapporo City General Hospital from July 2007 to April 2020. The patients with autonomous cortisol production were excluded. Using the blood samples from adrenal veins and inferior vena cava (IVC) after ACTH stimulation, the predicting ability of the left and right ratio of aldosterone concentration (aldosterone ratio, AR) for lateralization Index (LI) was examined by Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The predicting abilities of the ratio of aldosterone concentration between adrenal vein and IVC (aldosterone index, AI) and aldosterone concentration for selectivity index (SI) and contralateral ratio (CR) were also examined by ROC analysis. Results: Six samples (0.01%) with SI <5 after ACTH stimulation those were determined unsuccessful AVS. The results of the area under the curve (AUC) in ROC analysis of aldosterone concentration and AI for prediction of SI>5 was 0.998, 0.990, respectively, p=0.39. The optimal cut-off values of aldosterone concentration and AI for prediction successful AVS were 1700 pg/ml (sensitivity 99.5%, specificity 100%), 7.44 (sensitivity 94.0%, specificity 100%), respectively. Seventy-two patients (27.3%) had LI >4 who were diagnosed as unilateral aldosterone excess. AR had 0.94 of AUC for prediction of LR >4. The optimal cut-off value of AR was 3.53 (sensitivity 86.1%, specificity 94.8%). Eighty-two patients (31.1%) had unilateral CR<1. The AUC of aldosterone concentration and AI for prediction of CR<1 was 0.96, 0.98, respectively, p=0.07. The optimal cut-off values of aldosterone concentration and AI were 13600 pg/ml, 42, respectively. The sensitivity and the specificity at the optimal cut-off points of aldosterone concentration and AI were 91.5%, 91.5% and 91.5%, 94.8%, respectively. Conclusions: The determination of successful AVS and unilateral result in AVS can be predicted using aldosterone alone. It was suggested that AR is useful for tentative interpretation in the cases where the results of aldosterone were previously reported and lateralizing diagnosis of the cases with autonomous cortisol production.

scholarly journals Effect of Adrenocorticotropic Hormone Stimulation During Simultaneous Bilateral Adrenal Vein Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism

2021 ◽  
Vol 53 (06) ◽  
pp. 364-370
Author(s):  
Wei Liu ◽  
Jingjing Zhang ◽  
Yaling Yang ◽  
Yinxin Jin ◽  
Zaizhao Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone ◽  
Base Excess ◽  
Serum Potassium Level ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Acth Stimulation ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Combining Power ◽  
Lateralization Index

AbstractThe aim of the study was to investigate the significance and influence of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation in primary aldosteronism (PA) patients with simultaneous bilateral adrenal vein sampling (AVS). All patients diagnosed with PA underwent simultaneous bilateral AVS with ACTH. In 95 patients, the post-ACTH SI significantly increased (p<0.001), and it gradually decreased from t10–t30 after ACTH stimulation (p<0.001). The unsuccessful catheterization decreased after ACTH stimulation. Time points within 20 min after ACTH stimulation were better for sampling, and the selectivity did not increase over longer periods. According to lateralization before and after ACTH stimulation, the patients could be divided into 3 groups (U, unilateral; B, bilateral): U/U , U/B or B/U, and B/B. Compared with the U/U group, in the U/B or B/U and B/B groups, the lateralization index (LI) was lower both at baseline and after ACTH stimulation (p<0.0001), the contralateral index (CLI) was higher after ACTH stimulation (p<0.003), the serum potassium level was higher (p<0.001), and the carbon dioxide combining power (CO2CP) and base excess (BE) levels were lower. In conclusion, in simultaneous bilateral AVS, ACTH stimulation had significant effects on increasing the catheterization selectivity. Lateralization change was observed after stimulation. After ACTH stimulation, fewer patients could be diagnosed with lateralized PA. Patients with consistent lateralized PA showed a more serious phenotype.

scholarly journals Comparison of Cortisol, Androstenedione and Metanephrines to Assess Selectivity and Lateralization of Adrenal Vein Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (20) ◽  
pp. 4755
Author(s):  
Giulio Ceolotto ◽  
Giorgia Antonelli ◽  
Brasilina Caroccia ◽  
Michele Battistel ◽  
Giulio Barbiero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Selectivity Index ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
The Right

Success of adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is verified by the selectivity index (SI), i.e., by a step-up of cortisol levels between the adrenal vein and the infrarenal inferior vena cava samples, beyond a given cut-off. We tested the hypothesis that androstenedione, metanephrine, and normetanephrine, which have higher gradients than cortisol, could increase the rate of AVS studies judged to be bilaterally successful and usable for the clinical decision making. We prospectively compared within-patient, head-to-head, the selectivity index of androstenedione (SIA), metanephrine (SIM), and normetanephrine (SINM), and cortisol (SIC) in consecutive hypertensive patients with primary aldosteronism submitted to AVS. Main outcome measures were rate of bilateral success, SI values, and identification of unilateral PA. We recruited 136 patients (55 + 10 years, 35% women). Compared to the SIC, the SIA values were 3.5-fold higher bilaterally, and the SIM values were 7-fold and 4.4-fold higher on the right and the left side, respectively. With the SIA and the SIM the rate of bilaterally successful AVS increased by 14% and 15%, respectively without impairing the identification of unilateral PA. We concluded that androstenedione and metanephrine outperformed cortisol for ascertaining AVS success, thus increasing the AVS studies useable for the clinical decision making.

Abstract 277: Mutations in the KCNJ5 Gene Imply a Higher Lateralization Index at Adrenal Vein Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism

Hypertension ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 60 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa M Seccia ◽  
Franco Mantero ◽  
Claudio Letizia ◽  
Maniselvan Kuppusamy ◽  
Marlena Barisa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
K Channel ◽  
Coding Region ◽  
Aldosterone Secretion ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
Lateralization Index

Background. The mutations that affect the selectivity filter of the KCNJ5 K+ channel can play a role in triggering and/or maintaining aldosterone oversecretion in primary aldosteronism (PA). We therefore hypothesized that these somatic mutations can be associated with an increased aldosterone secretion from the APA, thus translating in raised plasma aldosterone concentrations (PAC) in the ipsilateral adrenal vein. Aim. To investigate if the lateralization index (LI) at adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is higher in the patients with an APA carrying the mutation (KCNJ5mut), as compared to those without the mutation (KCNJ5wt). Methods. Ninety-two consecutive PA patients who underwent AVS and received diagnosis of APA based on the four corners criteria were recruited. Unequivocal information on the presence or absence of the KCNJ5 mutations was available for each patient. The selectivity index (SI) was calculated as ratio between the right or left adrenal vein PCC (PCCside) and the infrarenal IVC PCC and a cutoff of 2.00 was used. The lateralization index (LI) was calculated in the bilaterally selective AVS as the ratio of PAC/PCC at the APA side to PAC/PCC at the contralateral side. We sequenced the KCNJ5 coding region spanning aminoacids 122 to 199, which include the selectivity filer. Results. The overall prevalence rate of KCNJ5 somatic mutations was 34%; G151R, L168R and T158A mutations were found in 19, 10 and 1 APA respectively. The G151E mutation was not found. The KCNJ5mut and KCNJ5wt groups were similar for gender, age, sK+ levels, while PAC and ARR were higher, and PRA lower (all p<0.05) in the KCNJ5 mut group. In the latter group the LI was higher than in the KCNJ5wt group (29.3± 6.7 vs 16.7±3.9, p< 0.02). This was due to a PAC/PCC ratio which was higher in the adrenal vein ipsilateral to the APA side and lower contralaterally in the KCNJ5mut group. Conclusions. These results provide direct in vivo evidence for a higher aldosterone secretion from APA carrying the KCNJ5 mutations, which translates into higher values of the LI, compared to the tumors without such mutations. Hence, the presence of these KCNJ5 mutations can affect the accuracy of the AVS-based diagnosis of the subtype of PA.

scholarly journals Variability of Aldosterone Measurements During Adrenal Venous Sampling for Primary Aldosteronism

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Yozamp ◽  
Gregory L Hundemer ◽  
Marwan Moussa ◽  
Johnathan Underhill ◽  
Tali Fudim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Adrenal Venous Sampling ◽  
Venous Sampling ◽  
Tertiary Referral Center ◽  
Percentage Difference ◽  
Left And Right ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Lateralization Index ◽  
Cortisol Ratio

Abstract BACKGROUND Variability of aldosterone concentrations has been described in patients with primary aldosteronism. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of 340 patients with primary aldosteronism who underwent adrenal venous sampling (AVS) at a tertiary referral center, 116 of whom also had a peripheral venous aldosterone measured hours before the procedure. AVS was performed by the same interventional radiologist using bilateral, simultaneous sampling, under unstimulated and then stimulated conditions, and each sample was obtained in triplicate. Main outcome measures were: (i) change in day of AVS venous aldosterone from pre-AVS to intra-AVS and (ii) variability of triplicate adrenal venous aldosterone concentrations during AVS. RESULTS Within an average duration of 131 minutes, 81% of patients had a decline in circulating aldosterone concentrations (relative decrease of 51% and median decrease of 7.0 ng/dl). More than a quarter (26%) of all patients had an inferior vena cava aldosterone of ≤5 ng/dl at AVS initiation. The mean coefficient of variation of triplicate adrenal aldosterone concentrations was 30% and 39%, in the left and right veins, respectively (corresponding to a percentage difference of 57% and 73%), resulting in lateralization discordance in up to 17% of patients if the lateralization index were calculated using only one unstimulated aldosterone-to-cortisol ratio rather than the average of triplicate measures. CONCLUSIONS Circulating aldosterone levels can reach nadirs conventionally considered incompatible with the primary aldosteronism diagnosis, and adrenal venous aldosterone concentrations exhibit acute variability that can confound AVS interpretation. A single venous aldosterone measurement lacks precision and reproducibility in primary aldosteronism.

scholarly journals Physiologic variance of corticotropin affects diagnosis in adrenal vein sampling

2009 ◽  
Vol 160 (3) ◽  
pp. 459-463 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayuki Tanemoto ◽  
Takehiro Suzuki ◽  
Michiaki Abe ◽  
Takaaki Abe ◽  
Sadayoshi Ito
Keyword(s):  
Low Dose ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Acth Stimulation ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Design And Methods ◽  
Diagnostic Step ◽  
Cortisol Ratio

ObjectiveDifferentiating unilateral form from bilateral is a critical diagnostic step in primary aldosteronism (PA), for which adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is accepted to be the most reliable. However, variance of corticotropin could affect the diagnosis in AVS.Design and methodsWe conducted simultaneous bilateral AVS on ten biochemically diagnosed PA cases, and used the aldosterone-to-cortisol ratio (A/C) of the samples for the diagnosis. The diagnosis by AVS after a low-dose (0.1 μg) ACTH stimulation, which can provoke maximum-physiologic corticotropic response, was compared with those before the stimulation and after the standard-dose (250 μg) ACTH stimulation.ResultsIn half of the cases, the low-dose pre-stimulation affected the diagnosis. In four out of ten cases, the side-to-side ratios of A/C were changed in the basal/low-dose/standard-dose AVS as 6.62/2.46/0.63, 2.13/0.41/0.14, 1.88/2.38/2.40, and 1.96/2.27/1.90 respectively. In three out of ten cases, the adrenal vein to the matching inferior vena cava ratio of A/C was also changed across 1, the cut-off to indicate suppression of aldosterone secretion. Additionally, the confirmation of successful sampling was difficult in five out of ten and two out of ten cases of the basal and low-dose AVS respectively, whereas it was easy in all the cases of the standard-dose AVS.ConclusionsThe diagnosis in the basal AVS could be affected by the physiologic fluctuation of ACTH at relatively high prevalence. The basal AVS would be unreliable to differentiate two forms of PA.

scholarly journals Somatic Mutations in the KCNJ5 Gene Raise the Lateralization Index: Implications for the Diagnosis of Primary Aldosteronism by Adrenal Vein Sampling

2012 ◽  
Vol 97 (12) ◽  
pp. E2307-E2313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa M. Seccia ◽  
Franco Mantero ◽  
Claudio Letizia ◽  
Maniselvan Kuppusamy ◽  
Brasilina Caroccia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Somatic Mutations ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
Lateralization Index

scholarly journals Rapid Cortisol Assay during Adrenal Vein Sampling in Patients with Primary Aldosteronism

2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 1968-1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio Mengozzi ◽  
Denis Rossato ◽  
Chiara Bertello ◽  
Corrado Garrone ◽  
Alberto Milan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Secondary Hypertension ◽  
Sampling Procedure ◽  
Standard Test ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
Bilateral Adrenal Hyperplasia ◽  
Service Oriented

Abstract Background: Adrenal vein sampling is considered the gold standard test to identify primary aldosteronism, the most frequent form of secondary hypertension. Technical difficulties with this procedure may be overcome by monitoring cortisol concentrations in the different sampling sites during catheterization. Methods: We applied a rapid automated cortisol assay performed on a benchtop immunoassay analyzer near the operating suite during the catheterization procedures in 5 hypertensive patients. A mean of 7.8 samples (range, 5–13) were collected from the vena cava as well as from right and left adrenal veins. Results: Cortisol concentrations measured by the rapid assay and by our routine method were comparable. Two of 5 patients were found to be affected by an aldosterone-producing adenoma and 3 of 5 by a bilateral adrenal hyperplasia. Cortisol determination during the adrenal vein sampling procedure allowed a successful cannulation in all patients, including a patient in whom it was necessary to cannulate 9 different candidate right adrenal veins before finding the correct one. Conclusions: Intraoperative cortisol assays appeared safe, reproducible, simple to perform, rapid, and cost-effective. The approach represents a service-oriented model for the laboratory and can provide valuable and timely information for improving the success rate of adrenal vein catheterization.

scholarly journals Primary aldosteronism subtyping in the setting of partially successful adrenal vein sampling

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204201882198923
Author(s):  
Seung-Eun Lee ◽  
Sung Woon Park ◽  
Min Sun Choi ◽  
Gyuri Kim ◽  
Jee Hee Yoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Roc Curve ◽  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
Derivation Cohort ◽  
Tertiary Hospitals ◽  
Frequent Failure ◽  
Youden’S Index

Background and aims: Frequent failure of adrenal vein (AV) cannulation is a major obstacle to the universal use of adrenal vein sampling (AVS) for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA). This study aimed to confirm and modify the value of a previously reported AVS parameter for PA subtyping in the case of cannulation failure on one side. Methods: Successfully catheterized AVS studies in 157 patients (121 patients as a derivation cohort and 36 patients as a validation cohort) from two tertiary hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. The AV/inferior vena cava (IVC) index was defined by dividing the aldosterone/cortisol ratio (ACR) of AV by the ACR of the IVC. Cutoff values for lateralized PA were obtained from two methods: scatterplots and the values corresponding to Youden’s index in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, on the assumption of catheterization failure on one side. Results: Due to multiple samplings in a single AVS procedure, 252 left AV/IVC ratios (LIRs) and 272 right AV/IVC ratios (RIRs) were calculated. Scatterplot cutoffs of LIR >5.4 or <0.5 predicted unilateral PA with a sensitivity of 42.1% and a specificity of 98.6%. Scatterplot cutoffs of RIR <0.5 or >7.0 showed a sensitivity of 55.1% and a specificity of 98.6%. ROC curve cutoffs of LIR ⩽0.8 or >3.1 predicted unilateral PA with a sensitivity of 82.5% and a specificity of 69.6%. ROC curve cutoffs of RIR ⩽0.8 or >3.9 resulted in 87.4% sensitivity and 80.7% specificity. Conclusion: In the case of unilateral AVS failure, the AV/IVC index may help in diagnosing PA subtype.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document