scholarly journals Comparison of Cortisol, Androstenedione and Metanephrines to Assess Selectivity and Lateralization of Adrenal Vein Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (20) ◽  
pp. 4755
Author(s):  
Giulio Ceolotto ◽  
Giorgia Antonelli ◽  
Brasilina Caroccia ◽  
Michele Battistel ◽  
Giulio Barbiero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Selectivity Index ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
The Right

Success of adrenal vein sampling (AVS) is verified by the selectivity index (SI), i.e., by a step-up of cortisol levels between the adrenal vein and the infrarenal inferior vena cava samples, beyond a given cut-off. We tested the hypothesis that androstenedione, metanephrine, and normetanephrine, which have higher gradients than cortisol, could increase the rate of AVS studies judged to be bilaterally successful and usable for the clinical decision making. We prospectively compared within-patient, head-to-head, the selectivity index of androstenedione (SIA), metanephrine (SIM), and normetanephrine (SINM), and cortisol (SIC) in consecutive hypertensive patients with primary aldosteronism submitted to AVS. Main outcome measures were rate of bilateral success, SI values, and identification of unilateral PA. We recruited 136 patients (55 + 10 years, 35% women). Compared to the SIC, the SIA values were 3.5-fold higher bilaterally, and the SIM values were 7-fold and 4.4-fold higher on the right and the left side, respectively. With the SIA and the SIM the rate of bilaterally successful AVS increased by 14% and 15%, respectively without impairing the identification of unilateral PA. We concluded that androstenedione and metanephrine outperformed cortisol for ascertaining AVS success, thus increasing the AVS studies useable for the clinical decision making.

scholarly journals An Alternative Method for Adrenal Venous Sampling in Cases in Which Right Adrenal Vein Sampling is Difficult

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akira Yamamoto ◽  
Takeshi Fukunaga ◽  
Mitsuru Takeuchi ◽  
Hiroki Nakamura ◽  
Akihiko Kanki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adrenocorticotropic Hormone ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Blood Sampling ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Threshold Values ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
Alternative Method ◽  
Aldosterone Producing Adenoma ◽  
The Right

Abstract PurposeCatheterization of the right adrenal vein (rt.AdV) to obtain blood samples can often be difficult. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether blood sampling from the inferior vena cava (IVC) at its juncture with the rt.AdV can be an alternative to sampling of blood directly from the rt.AdV.Materials and MethodsThis study included 44 patients diagnosed with primary aldosteronism (PA) in whom AVS with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) was performed, resulting in a diagnosis of idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA) (n=24), and patients diagnosed with unilateral aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) (n=20; rt.APA=8, lt.APA=12). In addition to regular blood sampling, blood was also sampled from the IVC, as the substitute rt.AdV [S-rt.AdV]. Diagnostic performance with the conventional lateralized index (LI) and the modified LI using the S-rt.AdV was compared to examine the utility of the modified LI.ResultsThe modified LI of the rt.APA (0.4±0.4) was significantly lower than those of the IHA (1.4±0.7) (p<0.001) and the lt.APA (3.5±2.0) (p<0.001). The modified LI of the lt.APA was significantly higher than those of the IHA (p<0.001) and rt.APA (p<0.001). Sensitivity and specificity to diagnose rt.APA and lt.APA using the modified LI with threshold values of 0.7 and 2.2, respectively, they were 87% and 75%, respectively, and 94% and 94%, respectively.ConclusionThe modified LI has the potential to be an alternative method for rt.AdV sampling in cases in which rt.AdV sampling is difficult. Obtaining the modified LI is extremely simple, which might complement conventional AVS.

scholarly journals Subtyping of primary aldosteronism by adrenal vein sampling: effect of acute D2 receptor dopaminergic blockade on adrenal vein cortisol and chromogranin A levels

2011 ◽  
Vol 165 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teresa M Seccia ◽  
Diego Miotto ◽  
Renzo De Toni ◽  
Valentina Gallina ◽  
Matteo Vincenzi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Chromogranin A ◽  
Inferior Vena ◽  
D2 Receptor ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Aldosterone Secretion ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
Plasma Cortisol Concentration ◽  
Design And Methods

BackgroundAdrenal vein sampling (AVS) is the gold standard for identifying the surgically curable forms of primary aldosteronism. Dopamine modulates adrenocortical steroidogenesis and tonically inhibits aldosterone secretion via D2 receptor. However, whether it could also affect the release of cortisol and chromogranin A (ChA), which can be used to assess the selectivity of AVS, is unknown.ObjectiveTo investigate whether metoclopramide increased the release of cortisol and ChA and could thereby improve assessment of the selectivity at AVS.Design and methodsWe investigated the effect of acute D2 antagonism with metoclopramide on cortisol and ChA release from the adrenal gland by comparing the adrenal vein and infrarenal inferior vena cava (IVC) hormone levels at baseline and after metoclopramide administration in 34 consecutive patients undergoing AVS.ResultsMetoclopramide increased plasma aldosterone in the IVC (P<0.00001) and in the adrenal vein blood (P<0.002) but failed to increase plasma cortisol concentration or ChA levels. Therefore, it did not increase the selectivity index based on the measurement of either hormone.ConclusionsThis study shows that the release of cortisol and ChA is not subjected to tonic D2 dopaminergic inhibition. Therefore, these findings lend no evidence for the usefulness of acute metoclopramide administration for enhancing the assessment of the selectivity of blood sampling during AVS with the use of either cortisol or ChA assay.

scholarly journals Factors Influencing Physicians' Clinical Decision-making at Upazila Health Complexes in Bangladesh

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 125-133
Author(s):  
M. Aminul Islam ◽  
M. Abdul Awal
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Social Networks ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Average Length ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Primary Data ◽  
Decision Making Process ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Right ◽  
Consultation Session

ABSTRACT Introduction Selecting the most appropriate treatment for each patient is the key activity in patient-physician encounters and providing healthcare services. Achieving desirable clinical goals mostly depends on making the right decision at the right time in any healthcare setting. But little is known about physicians' clinical decision-making in the primary care setting in Bangladesh. Therefore, this study explored the factors that influence decisions about prescribing medications, ordering pathologic tests, counseling patients, average length of patient visits in a consultation session, and referral of patients to other physicians or hospitals by physicians at Upazila Health Complexes (UHCs) in the country. It also explored the structure of physicians' social networks and their association with the decision-making process. Methods This was a cross-sectional descriptive study that used primary data collected from 85 physicians. The respondents, who work at UHCs in the Rajshahi Division, were selected purposively. The collected data were analyzed with descriptive statistics including frequency, percentage, one-way analysis of variance, and linear regression to understand relationships among the variables. Results The results of the study reveal that multiple factors influence physicians' decisions about prescribing medications, ordering pathologic tests, length of visits, counseling patients, and referring patients to other physicians or hospitals at the UHCs. Most physicians prescribe drugs to their patients, keeping in mind their purchasing capacity. Risk of violence by patients' relatives and better management are the two key factors that influence physicians' referral decisions. The physicians' professional and personal social networks also play an influential role in the decision-making process. It was found that physicians dedicate on average 16.17 minutes to a patient in a consultation session. The length of visits is influenced by various factors including the distance between the physicians' residence and their workplace, their level of education, and the number of colleagues with whom they have regular contact and from whom they can seek help. Conclusion The results of the study have yielded some novel insights about the complexity of physicians' everyday tasks at the UHCs in Bangladesh. The results would be of interest to public health researchers and policy makers.

scholarly journals Adrenal Venous Sampling in Primary Aldosteronism: The Usefulness of Contralateral Suppression Index

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natalia Treistman ◽  
Aline Barbosa Moraes ◽  
Stéphanie Cozzolino ◽  
Patrícia de Fatima dos Santos Teixeira ◽  
Leonardo Vieira Neto
Keyword(s):  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Adrenal Venous Sampling ◽  
Venous Sampling ◽  
Successful Cannulation ◽  
Contralateral Suppression ◽  
The Right ◽  
Cortisol Ratio ◽  
Suppression Index

Adrenal venous sampling (AVS) is the gold standard test to differentiate the unilateral from the bilateral form in patients with primary aldosteronism (PA) although it may be a difficult procedure, especially the successful cannulation of the right adrenal vein. In this report, we describe a 49-year-old female patient diagnosed with PA, after investigating resistant hypertension and refractory hypokalemia. Abdominal computed tomography scan revealed a 2.5 cm adenoma on the right adrenal vein. AVS was performed under cosyntropin infusion. Aldosterone and cortisol concentrations were obtained from the right and left adrenal veins and inferior vena cava (IVC). Cortisol on each adrenal vein divided by cortisol on IVC confirmed successful cannulation of the left side only, which makes it impossible to calculate the lateralization index (LI). From the data on the left adrenal vein and IVC, the aldosterone-to-cortisol ratio divided by the IVC aldosterone-to-cortisol ratio was less than 1.0, suggesting that the left adrenal vein was suppressed with the excess aldosterone originating from the contralateral side (contralateral suppression index (CSI)). Right adrenalectomy was performed; postoperative hypoaldosteronism was confirmed. This report highlights the importance of CSI obtained in AVS when technical difficulties occur making it impossible to obtain LI, which is most commonly used to decide between surgical and clinical management of PA.

scholarly journals Complexity of Clinical Decision Making: Consent, Capacity, and Ethics

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (03) ◽  
pp. 162-169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Askren ◽  
Paula Leslie
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Negative Charge ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Informed Consent Process ◽  
Thickened Liquids ◽  
Medical Decisions ◽  
Social Media Platforms ◽  
The Right ◽  
Right To Refuse

AbstractSpeech–language pathologists (SLPs), and really their patients, are often faced with challenging clinical decisions to be made. Patients may decline interventions recommended by the SLP and are often inappropriately labeled “noncompliant.” The inappropriateness of this label extends beyond the negative charge; the patient's right to refuse is, in fact, protected by law. Anecdotal exchanges, social media platforms, and American Speech-Language-Hearing Association forums have recently revealed that many SLPs are struggling with the patient's right to decline. Many are not comfortable with the informed consent process and what entails patients' capacity to make their own medical decisions. Here, we discuss the basics of clinical decision-making ethics with intent to minimize the clinician's discomfort with the right to refuse those thickened liquids and eliminate the practice of defensive medicine.

scholarly journals Lateralizing Asymmetry of Adrenal Imaging and Adrenal Vein Sampling in Patients With Primary Aldosteronism

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (7) ◽  
pp. 1393-1402 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norio Wada ◽  
Yui Shibayama ◽  
Takashi Yoneda ◽  
Takuyuki Katabami ◽  
Isao Kurihara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Diagnostic Techniques ◽  
Concordance Rate ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Ct Scans ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
Adrenal Imaging ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Nodular Lesions ◽  
The Right

Abstract Context In patients with primary aldosteronism (PA), it remains unclear whether aldosterone-producing adenomas are likely to develop in the left or right adrenal gland. Objective To investigate left-right differences of PA laterality diagnoses via CT imaging and adrenal vein sampling (AVS). Design Retrospective, observational study. Patients From the Japan Primary Aldosteronism Study, 1493 patients with PA were enrolled who underwent CT and ACTH-stimulated AVS. Measurements Left or right adrenal nodular lesion distribution and laterality observed on CT scans and from AVS were noted. Results Both on CT scans and AVS, unilateral results were observed more frequently on the left side than on the right side (25.1% vs 15.4% and 17.3% vs 13.5%, respectively; P < 0.01for both diagnostic techniques). There was no significant difference in the concordance rate for CT and AVS between patients with left and right unilateral nodular lesions observed on CT scans (44.1% and 50.9%, respectively; P = 0.15). In patients with nodules <20 mm, the concordance rate was significantly greater on the right side than the left side (45.8% vs 56.4%; P = 0.03). In patients with bilateral results of AVS, unilateral nodular lesions were detected more frequently on the left side than the right side (17.8% vs 9.4%; P < 0.01). Conclusion These results suggest aldosterone-producing adenomas and nonfunctioning tumors are more likely to develop on the left side in patients with PA and that misdiagnosis of CT-based lateralization may occur more frequently on the left side.

scholarly journals Rapid Cortisol Assay during Adrenal Vein Sampling in Patients with Primary Aldosteronism

2007 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 1968-1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulio Mengozzi ◽  
Denis Rossato ◽  
Chiara Bertello ◽  
Corrado Garrone ◽  
Alberto Milan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Secondary Hypertension ◽  
Sampling Procedure ◽  
Standard Test ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
Bilateral Adrenal Hyperplasia ◽  
Service Oriented

Abstract Background: Adrenal vein sampling is considered the gold standard test to identify primary aldosteronism, the most frequent form of secondary hypertension. Technical difficulties with this procedure may be overcome by monitoring cortisol concentrations in the different sampling sites during catheterization. Methods: We applied a rapid automated cortisol assay performed on a benchtop immunoassay analyzer near the operating suite during the catheterization procedures in 5 hypertensive patients. A mean of 7.8 samples (range, 5–13) were collected from the vena cava as well as from right and left adrenal veins. Results: Cortisol concentrations measured by the rapid assay and by our routine method were comparable. Two of 5 patients were found to be affected by an aldosterone-producing adenoma and 3 of 5 by a bilateral adrenal hyperplasia. Cortisol determination during the adrenal vein sampling procedure allowed a successful cannulation in all patients, including a patient in whom it was necessary to cannulate 9 different candidate right adrenal veins before finding the correct one. Conclusions: Intraoperative cortisol assays appeared safe, reproducible, simple to perform, rapid, and cost-effective. The approach represents a service-oriented model for the laboratory and can provide valuable and timely information for improving the success rate of adrenal vein catheterization.

scholarly journals Primary aldosteronism subtyping in the setting of partially successful adrenal vein sampling

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 204201882198923
Author(s):  
Seung-Eun Lee ◽  
Sung Woon Park ◽  
Min Sun Choi ◽  
Gyuri Kim ◽  
Jee Hee Yoo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Roc Curve ◽  
Primary Aldosteronism ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Roc Curves ◽  
Adrenal Vein ◽  
Adrenal Vein Sampling ◽  
Derivation Cohort ◽  
Tertiary Hospitals ◽  
Frequent Failure ◽  
Youden’S Index

Background and aims: Frequent failure of adrenal vein (AV) cannulation is a major obstacle to the universal use of adrenal vein sampling (AVS) for subtyping primary aldosteronism (PA). This study aimed to confirm and modify the value of a previously reported AVS parameter for PA subtyping in the case of cannulation failure on one side. Methods: Successfully catheterized AVS studies in 157 patients (121 patients as a derivation cohort and 36 patients as a validation cohort) from two tertiary hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. The AV/inferior vena cava (IVC) index was defined by dividing the aldosterone/cortisol ratio (ACR) of AV by the ACR of the IVC. Cutoff values for lateralized PA were obtained from two methods: scatterplots and the values corresponding to Youden’s index in receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, on the assumption of catheterization failure on one side. Results: Due to multiple samplings in a single AVS procedure, 252 left AV/IVC ratios (LIRs) and 272 right AV/IVC ratios (RIRs) were calculated. Scatterplot cutoffs of LIR >5.4 or <0.5 predicted unilateral PA with a sensitivity of 42.1% and a specificity of 98.6%. Scatterplot cutoffs of RIR <0.5 or >7.0 showed a sensitivity of 55.1% and a specificity of 98.6%. ROC curve cutoffs of LIR ⩽0.8 or >3.1 predicted unilateral PA with a sensitivity of 82.5% and a specificity of 69.6%. ROC curve cutoffs of RIR ⩽0.8 or >3.9 resulted in 87.4% sensitivity and 80.7% specificity. Conclusion: In the case of unilateral AVS failure, the AV/IVC index may help in diagnosing PA subtype.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document