Author Response: Risk and Predictors of Depression Following Acute Ischemic Stroke in the Elderly

Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 97 (18) ◽  
pp. 880.1-880
Author(s):  
Laura K. Stein ◽  
Naomi Mayman ◽  
Mandip S. Dhamoon
Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 97 (18) ◽  
pp. 879.2-880
Author(s):  
Krupa Patel ◽  
Chintan Trivedi ◽  
Zeeshan Mansuri ◽  
Shailesh Jain

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thabele M Leslie-Mazwi ◽  
Syed F Ali ◽  
Sanjeeva R Onteddu ◽  
Adewumi D Amole ◽  
Mehmet S Akdol ◽  
...  

Introduction: An overwhelming benefit from endovascular treatment (EVT) of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) has been shown in recent trials, making it the new evidence-based standard of care for ischemic stroke due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion. We sought to determine usage, safety and efficacy of EVT in patients ≥80 years of age. Methods: Using GWTG stroke registry data from MGH and UAMS, we analyzed 7,505 consecutive stroke admissions from 01/2009 - 06/2016. Univariate analysis was carried out to compare AIS patients < 80 vs. those ≥ 80yr. Results: Of the total 7,505 AIS patients, 3,722 presented within 12 hr of last known well and of these 334 (334/3722, 9%) underwent EVT. The majority of AIS patients undergoing EVT were younger than 80yr of age (264/334, 79%). Of the patients who underwent EVT, younger patients were more often male, Caucasian, and had stroke risk factors of atrial fibrillation, CAD, hypertension and smokers. The two groups were similar in NIHSS, initial clinical presentation, modified pre-stroke Rankin scale of ≤ 3, and initiation of tPA as a drip and ship or stroke center front-door administration. Higher rates of pneumonia were observed in younger patients while rates of sICH were similar. Younger patients were more often discharged to home/inpatient rehabilitation facility. On univariate analysis, in-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients ≥ 80yr [Unadj. OR 2.50 (1.24, 5.03), p=0.01], however the strength of the association attenuated substantially after adjusting for significant covariates [Adj. OR 2.34 (0.99, 5.47), p=0.05] (Table). Conclusion: Elderly stroke patients are largely excluded from clinical trials and data are limited on the effectiveness of EVT in this cohort. Our results showed that rate of sICH and adjusted in-hospital mortality was not statistically different between those < 80yr vs. ≥ 80yr. Further studies are needed to explore the functional outcome of the elderly stroke patients undergoing EVT.


2019 ◽  
Vol 405 ◽  
pp. 91-92
Author(s):  
F. Perren ◽  
O. Kargiotis ◽  
A. Terruzzi ◽  
D. Krieger ◽  
G. Tsivgoulis ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Tanzila Shams ◽  
Jitendra Sharma ◽  
Richard Jung ◽  
Kristine Blackham

Background: In the setting of acute ischemic stroke, endovascular intervention, once considered experimental, is now gold standard of care of appropriately selected patients. Among the elderly, aged 80 and above, patients have multiple comorbidities, and little data exists regarding clinical outcome for those undergoing different endovascular treatment modalities. Objectives: To assess the safety and efficacy of different endovascular treatment modalities in elderly, aged 80 and above, compared to patients younger than 80 with acute ischemic stroke Methods: Restrospective chart review was performed in 150 consecutive patients who underwent endovascular treatments for acute ischemic stroke at our center between 2008 and 2011, between age range 17 -93 years. Elderly patients (EP) age 80 and above (n=34) were compared to nonelderly patients age <80 (NEP) (n=116). The patients in both groups underwent mechanical (including MERCI and or Penumbra and/or angioplasty and stenting) and/or chemical thrombolysis (intra-arterial tPA). We compared the specific outcome parameters of EP vs NEP groups, including discharge NIHSS, modified Rankin Scale (mRS), rate of partial to complete recanalization (TIMI 2-3), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and all cause mortality. Results: In EP, mean age was 84.9 ± 3.3, with 32.3% (n=11) males and 67.6% (n=23) females. In NEP mean age was 63.6 ± 13.1, with 50.9% (n=59) males and 49.1% (n=57) females. 91.3% (n=106) In EP vs NEP, mean initial NIHSS were 19±7 and 16±6, and discharge NIHSS 9±7 and 12±8, respectively. Rates of recanalization occurred in 67.6% (n=23) in EP, and 71.6% (n=83) in NEP. Discharge mRS 3 or less was 2.9% (n=1) in EP, and 17.2% (n=20) in NEP. Symptomatic ICH occurred in 20.6% (n=7) in EP and 14.7% (n=17) in NEP. All cause mortality rate at discharge in EP group was 41.2% (n=14) and 19.8% (n=23) in NEP. Conclusions: In our experience EP had poor clinical outcomes with increased mortality and hemorrhage rate compared to NEP irrespective of similar recanalization rate. Further prospective trial is warranted to evaluate safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment in patients aged 80 years old and above.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document