Andexanet Alfa for Factor Xa Inhibitor-Associated Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Does a Specific Reversal Agent Justify Its Cost?

Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012857
Author(s):  
Nikhil Patel ◽  
Nicholas A. Morris
2019 ◽  
Vol 53 (11) ◽  
pp. 1167-1167 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian W. Gilbert ◽  
Jacob A. Reeder

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hagen B. Huttner ◽  
Stefan T. Gerner ◽  
Joji B. Kuramatsu ◽  
Stuart J. Connolly ◽  
Jan Beyer-Westendorf ◽  
...  

Background and Purpose: It is unestablished whether andexanet alfa, compared with guideline-based usual care including prothrombin complex concentrates, is associated with reduced hematoma expansion (HE) and mortality in patients with factor-Xa inhibitor–related intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). We compared the occurrence of HE and clinical outcomes in patients treated either with andexanet alfa or with usual care during the acute phase of factor-Xa inhibitor–related ICH. Methods: Data were extracted from the multicenter, prospective, single-arm ANNEXA-4 trial (Andexanet Alfa, a Novel Antidote to the Anticoagulation Effects of Factor Xa Inhibitors) and a multicenter observational cohort study, RETRACE-II (German-Wide Multicenter Analysis of Oral Anticoagulant-Associated Intracerebral Hemorrhage - Part Two). HE was based on computed tomography scans performed within 36 hours from baseline imaging. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was performed to adjust for baseline comorbidities and ICH severity. Patients presenting with atraumatic ICH while receiving apixaban or rivaroxaban within 18 hours of admission were included. Patients with secondary ICH or not fulfilling the inclusion criteria for the ANNEXA-4 trial were excluded. We compared ANNEXA-4 patients, who received andexanet alfa for hemostatic treatment, with RETRACE-II patients who were treated with usual care, primarily administration of prothrombin complex concentrates. Primary outcome was rate of HE defined as relative increase of ≥35%. Secondary outcomes comprised mean absolute change in hematoma volume, as well as in-hospital mortality and functional outcome. Results: Overall, 182 patients with factor-Xa inhibitor–related ICH (85 receiving andexanet alfa versus 97 receiving usual care) were selected for analysis. There were no relevant differences regarding demographic or clinical characteristics between both groups. HE occurred in 11 of 80 (14%) andexanet alfa patients compared with 21 of 67 (36%) usual care patients (adjusted relative risk, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.20–0.78]; P =0.005), with a reduction in mean overall hematoma volume change of 7 mL. There were no statistically significant differences among in-hospital mortality or functional outcomes. Sensitivity analysis including only usual care patients receiving prothrombin complex concentrates demonstrated consistent results. Conclusions: As compared with usual care, andexanet alfa was associated with a lower rate of HE in atraumatic factor-Xa inhibitor–related ICH, however, without translating into significantly improved clinical outcomes. A comparative trial is needed to confirm the benefit on limiting HE and to explore clinical outcomes across patient subgroups and by time to treatment.


2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Charlie J. Nederpelt ◽  
Leon Naar ◽  
Pieta Krijnen ◽  
Saskia le Cessie ◽  
Haytham M. A. Kaafarani ◽  
...  

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Syed Daniyal Asad ◽  
Stephanie R Lombardi ◽  
Ilene Staff ◽  
Amre M Nouh ◽  
Mark J Alberts

Background: Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a devastating condition with high 30- day mortality. Up to a third of patients experience hematoma expansion within the first 24 hours; anticoagulation with factor Xa inhibitors may increase the risk of expansion and poor outcomes. Objective: We assessed our experience using Andexanet alfa (Aα) by evaluating stabilization of the hematoma and ischemic complications. Methods: We conducted a single center prospective observational study on all patients receiving Aα for reversal of anticoagulation in the setting of an ICH and use of Factor Xa inhibitors. The degree of hematoma expansion within 12 hours of drug administration on non-contrast head CT was categorized as 'excellent' (<20% increase in hematoma size), ‘good' ( > 20-<35%), and 'poor' ( > 35%). Secondary outcomes included dosage, median length of stay, mortality, modified Rankin score (mRS), discharge disposition, and ischemic complications. Results: Fifteen patients received Aα (5=lobar, 5=deep, 5= multicompartment). One patient with a presumed deep hemorrhage was excluded because subsequent imaging showed chronic mineralization. The predominant etiologies were hypertension (40%), amyloid angiopathy (26.6%) and trauma (13.3%). The median age was 86 years (IQR 19) and median ICH score on arrival was 2 (IQR 2), and median hematoma size was 14.3 mL (IQR 34.5). Most patients (71.4%) received the low dose formulation. Based on hematoma expansion, 64.3%, 14.3% and 21.4% of patients achieved excellent, good and poor hemostasis, respectively. Reduction in hematoma size was seen in 20% (n=3) while 13.3% (n=2) patients had no expansion. Median ICU and hospital length of stays were 2.0 days (IQR 2.2) and 6.6 days (IQR 9.78) respectively. Mortality was 28.6% and median mRS upon discharge was 4 (IQR 2), with most patients discharged to rehabilitation facilities (60%). There were no ischemic complications. Conclusion: Our experience is consistent with the results of the ANNEXA 4 study with 78.6% of patients showing excellent or good hemostasis. These results led to improved clinical outcomes, with 60% of patients being discharged to rehabilitation. These data support the efficacy of this treatment paradigm in a real-world setting.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (10) ◽  
pp. 2532-2541
Author(s):  
Charlie J. Nederpelt ◽  
Leon Naar ◽  
Katelyn W. Sylvester ◽  
Megan E. Barra ◽  
Russel J. Roberts ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (06) ◽  
pp. 726-736 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanting Fuh ◽  
Jonathan Sin ◽  
Joshua Goldstein ◽  
Bryan Hayes

AbstractIn patients with acute intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), one of the major concerns is ongoing bleeding or ICH expansion. Anticoagulated patients are at higher risk of ongoing expansion and worse outcome. It may be that rapid anticoagulation reversal can reduce the risk of expansion and improve clinical outcome. For those taking coumarins, the best available evidence suggests that intravenous vitamin K combined with four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) is the most rapid and effective regimen to restore hemostasis. For those on dabigatran, the highest quality data available for reversal are for idarucizumab, although it is not yet clear whether patients derive clinical benefit from this reversal. In the absence or failure of idarucizumab, activated prothrombin complex concentrate (aPCC) is recommended. For those on factor Xa inhibitors, the ideal reversal agent is not clear. Many providers use 4F-PCC or aPCC, but more specific agents are in clinical trials and may soon be available. In addition, the half-lives of the non–vitamin K antagonists are relatively short compared with warfarin, and so some patients may not have a clinically relevant coagulopathy at the time of presentation. Overall, the optimal reversal agent, when one is required, is a function of which anticoagulant the patient is taking.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 711-711
Author(s):  
Michiel Coppens ◽  
Lizhen Xu ◽  
Roisin Bavalia ◽  
Saskia Middeldorp ◽  
Peter Verhamme ◽  
...  

Introduction Andexanet alfa is a modified recombinant inactive form of human factor Xa developed for reversal of factor Xa inhibitors. In the ANNEXA-4 study, patients with acute major bleeding within 18 h after administration of a factor Xa inhibitor were enrolled and received a bolus of andexanet, followed by a 2-h infusion (Connolly, NEJM 2019;380:1326). In this study, 82% of patients achieved effective hemostasis at 12 h and 10% developed a thrombotic event within 30 days. Anti-Xa activity decreased by 92% after the andexanet bolus but partially recovered after the end of the 2 h infusion. In the present analysis, we evaluated the effect of andexanet alfa on thrombin generation (TG) in patients enrolled in the ANNEXA-4 study and we explored whether TG predicts effective hemostasis or thrombotic events. Methods We included all patients who received andexanet alfa. TG was expressed as the endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) which is the area under the thrombin generation curve. We plotted mean TG at different timepoints between baseline and 30 days after andexanet alfa in patients treated with apixaban and rivaroxaban. We compared the absolute ETP level at 8 h (ETP-8H) after andexanet bolus as this was the first timepoint after the 2 h infusion for which an ETP level was available for most patients. We compared ETP-8H levels between patients with and without effective hemostasis and between those with and without thrombotic events, respectively. ETP-8H was evaluated as a predictor of effective hemostasis and thrombotic events by logistic regression analysis in all patients, and in subgroups of patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) and non-ICH separately. In the ICH subgroups, ETP-8H was also evaluated as a predictor of absolute change in hematoma volume. Results The study population comprised 352 patients (mean age 77.4 years; 47% female) with acute major bleeding (64% ICH, 26% gastrointestinal, 10% other) treated with apixaban (55%), rivaroxaban (36%), enoxaparin (6%), or edoxaban (3%). ETP-8H was available for 327 patients (93%). In patients treated with apixaban or rivaroxaban, andexanet bolus promptly increased mean ETP and this was maintained during infusion. After end of infusion ETP fell but remained in the reference range for at least 18 hours (Figure 1). ETP-8H was similar in patients with or without effective hemostasis (Fig 2a, p = 0.544) and in patients with or without thrombotic complications (Fig 2b, p = 0.610). In the logistic regression analysis, ETP-8H did not predict effective hemostasis (p=0.491) or thrombotic events (p=0.743) (Table), and these results were consistent in ICH and non-ICH patients. ETP-8H did not predict hematoma growth in patients with ICH (p = 0.349). Conclusion A bolus of andexanet alfa, followed by a 2-h infusion in patients with factor Xa inhibitor associated major bleeding promptly restores thrombin generation and this effect is sustained for at least 18 hours. Thrombin generation at 8 h after andexanet bolus did not predict effective hemostasis, intracranial hematoma growth, or thrombotic events. This may be explained by the andexanet dose which was chosen to ensure full reversal of the factor Xa inhibitor in all patients. Disclosures Coppens: Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Sanquin Blood Supply: Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria; Uniqure: Research Funding; CSL Behring: Honoraria, Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Honoraria; Boehringer Ingelheim: Research Funding. Middeldorp:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: honoraria for advisory activities; Aspen: Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: honoraria for advisory activities; Boehringer Ingelheim: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: honoraria for advisory activities; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Other: honoraria for advisory activities, Research Funding; Sanofi: Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Other: honoraria for advisory activities, Research Funding. Verhamme:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Boehringer Ingelheim: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Leo Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy. Eikelboom:Heart and Stroke Foundation: Research Funding; Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Glaxo Smith Kline: Honoraria, Research Funding; Eli Lilly: Honoraria, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Research Funding; Boehringer Ingelheim: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Honoraria, Research Funding. Crowther:Bayer: Other: Data and Safety Monitoring Board, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Servier Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Other: preparing educational material and/or providing educational presentations; CSL Behring: Other: preparing educational material and/or providing educational presentations; Diagnostica Stago: Other: preparing educational material and/or providing educational presentations, Research Funding; Alnylam: Equity Ownership; Asahi Kasei: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Lu:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Yue:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Equity Ownership. Conley:Portola Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Connolly:Portola Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 465-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas M. Ellington

Andexanet alfa is the newly approved factor Xa inhibitor reversal agent for the treatment of life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding from apixaban or rivaroxaban. This decoy protein directly binds factor Xa inhibitors reversing their action. A systematic and evidence-based evaluation of the available clinical trials is lacking in the literature. This research will provide a systematic and evidence-based evaluation of published clinical trials for andexanet alfa. It will also present an evaluation of active research. Reports of research were identified through multiple databases using search terms andexanet alfa, andexanet, or PRT064445. The level of evidence and strength of recommendation were accomplished using the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy. There are 2 published articles presenting 3 clinical trials. Two trials had a low level of evidence and the third trial, a preliminary report of results, showed a moderate level of evidence. The review of active research found 3 unique studies and a preliminary results study. The level of evidence is low for 2 of these studies, moderate for a third, and potentially high for the fourth. The strength of recommendation for all 6 studies is a C. Four of the studies present disease-oriented evidence resulting in a low level of evidence. Another study is unblinded and uncontrolled but presents patient-oriented evidence resulting in a moderate level of evidence. Only one study could score high because the outcome is patient-oriented evidence, and it could achieve follow-up of 80%. There is a need for well-controlled and blinded evaluation to improve the recommendation strength.


Author(s):  
Mohammad N Kayyali ◽  
Oana M Dumitrascu

Introduction : Andexanet alfa is the only specific reversal agent for factor Xa inhibitors and received FDA approval in 2018. Here we report an early infusion adverse event in a patient with acute intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) that received Andexanet alfa, with an unfavorable outcome. Methods : A 73‐year‐old male presented to our emergency department (ED) after he developed sudden onset of severe headache without other associated neurological symptoms. An outpatient brain MRI showed IVH, that remained stable in size (2.4 cm3) on a follow‐up head CT performed in our ED. CT angiogram showed a 60% stenosis of the left supraclinoid internal carotid artery. The patient was taking apixaban 5 mg twice daily for atrial fibrillation (last dose 5.5 hours prior to presentation). Results : The anticoagulation was reversed with Andexanet alfa, 400 mg bolus given at 18:30, followed by 480 mg infusion over 2 hours started at 19:00 (12 hours from last apixaban dose). At 19:00, he developed left middle cerebral artery (MCA) ischemic stroke symptoms (global aphasia) that resolved with head‐of‐the‐bed flattening. CT perfusion demonstrated left ICA territory mismatch (342 ml) and 76 ml core. Shortly after CT perfusion, the patient developed a persistent complete left MCA stroke syndrome with NIH stroke scale (NIHSS) score 23. Decision was made to perform emergent cerebral angiogram which demonstrated a large, fresh thrombus in the left cervical ICA. Thrombectomy was successful with TICI score 2B. Patient’s neurological status initially improved. However, despite this intervention, patient developed a large territory infarct. As neurologic status remained poor, family withdrew care and patient died. Conclusions : ANNEXA‐A and ANNEXA‐R were parallel trials of Andexanet alfa for factor Xa inhibitor reversal that demonstrated a transient increase in prothrombotic factors post Andexanet alfa infusion. Neither of these phase 3 trials nor the previous phase 2 trials reported a clinical thrombotic event very early during the infusion. The ANNEXA‐4 trial (Phase 3) enrolled subjects with active major bleeding on a factor Xa inhibitor and 10% developed a thrombotic event during the 30‐day follow‐up period. 41% of the thrombotic complications were acute ischemic stroke (AIS), 35% (5 patients) experienced an AIS in the first six days post‐administration and the earliest reported thrombotic event occurred day 1 post infusion. Our case report illustrates an early cerebrovascular thrombotic event with dismal outcome despite timely and effective mechanical reperfusion therapy, which could be due to vessel re‐obstruction in setting of a hypercoagulable state. We aim to make vascular neurologists, neurointensivists and neurosurgeons aware of this possible occurrence when reversing patients with factor Xa‐related intracranial hemorrhages.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document