l(1)pole hole is required maternally for pattern formation in the terminal regions of the embryo

Development ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 106 (1) ◽  
pp. 145-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Ambrosio ◽  
A.P. Mahowald ◽  
N. Perrimon

Maternal expression of the l(1)pole hole (l(1)ph) gene product is required for the development of the Drosophila embryo. When maternal l(1)ph+ activity is absent, alterations in the embryonic fate map occur as visualized by the expression of segmentation genes fushitarazu and engrailed. If both maternal and zygotic activity is absent, embryos degenerate around 7 h of development. If only maternal activity is missing, embryos complete embryogenesis and show deletions of both anterior and posterior structures. Anteriorly, structures originating from labral and acron head regions are missing. Posteriorly, abdominal segments A8, 9 and 10, the telson and the proctodeum are missing. Similar pattern deletions are observed in embryos derived from the terminal class of female sterile mutations. Thus, the maternal l(1)ph+ gene product is required for the establishment of cell identities at the anterior and posterior poles of the Drosophila embryo.

Development ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 101 (3) ◽  
pp. 421-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Mlodzik ◽  
W.J. Gehring

The establishment of the body pattern of Drosophila along the anteroposterior axis requires the coordinated functions of at least three classes of genes. First, the maternally active coordinate genes define the polarity of the embryo and act as primary determinants; second, the segmentation genes divide the developing embryo into the correct number of segments and third, the segments become specified by the homeotic selector genes. We have examined the effects of mutations in the genes of the first two classes on the spatial distribution of the protein product(s) of the caudal (cad) gene, which in wild type shows a graded distribution along the anteroposterior axis during the syncytial blastoderm stage, whereas its persistent zygotic expression is confined to the telson region (the posterior terminal structures). Mutations in maternal genes that specify the spatial coordinates of the egg and the future embryo change the gradient distribution of cad according to the alterations of the fate map which they produce. A second group of maternally expressed genes, the gap genes of the ‘grandchildless-knirps’ group, which are considered to represent posterior activities, do not have any effect on the cad gradient. The same is true for the zygotic segmentation genes that are active after fertilization. However, the same class of zygotic genes partly affects the zygotic cad expression in the telson. Therefore, the two phases of cad expression represent different levels within the genetic hierarchy. The cad protein gradient seems to form in response to the primary maternal determinants independent of the segmentation genes, whereas the latter influence zygotic cad expression in the telson region which corresponds to a homeotic selector gene function.


Genetics ◽  
1988 ◽  
Vol 119 (1) ◽  
pp. 123-133
Author(s):  
S Gerttula ◽  
Y S Jin ◽  
K V Anderson

Abstract Maternal expression of the Toll gene is required for the production and the correct spatial organization of all lateral and ventral structures of the Drosophila embryo. We show here that the Toll gene is transcribed zygotically in the embryo and that zygotic expression is important for the viability of the larva. Both genetic and molecular data indicate that the zygotic Toll product has the same biochemical activity as the maternal product. The spatial distribution of the Toll transcript in the embryo was analyzed. In contrast to the uniform distribution of the maternal RNA, the zygotic Toll RNA is present in a complex spatial and temporal pattern in the embryo. A striking feature of this pattern is the correlation of the regions of invaginating cells with sites of accumulation of zygotic Toll RNA.


1987 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 464-470 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A. Mahoney ◽  
Judith A. Lengyel

Cell ◽  
1985 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 779-789 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn V. Anderson ◽  
Gerd Jürgens ◽  
Christiane Nüsslein-Volhard

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 147-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Lepage ◽  
C. Ghiglione ◽  
C. Gache

A cDNA clone coding for a sea urchin embryonic protein was isolated from a prehatching blastula lambda gt11 library. The predicted translation product is a secreted 64 × 10(3) Mr enzyme designated as BP10. The protein contains several domains: a signal peptide, a putative propeptide, a catalytic domain with an active center typical of a Zn(2+)-metalloprotease, an EGF-like domain and two internal repeats similar to repeated domains found in the C1s and C1r serine proteases of the complement cascade. The BP10 protease is constructed with the same domains as the human bone morphogenetic protein BMP-1, a protease described as a factor involved in bone formation, and as the recently characterized product of the tolloid gene which is required for correct dorsal-ventral patterning of the Drosophila embryo. The transcription of the BP10 gene is transiently activated around the 16- to 32-cell stage and the accumulation of BP10 transcripts is limited to a short period at the blastula stage. By in situ hybridization with digoxygenin-labelled RNA probes, the BP10 transcripts were only detected in a limited area of the blastula, showing that the transcription of the BP10 gene is also spatially controlled. Antibodies directed against a fusion protein were used to detect the BP10 protein in embryonic extracts. The protein is first detected in early blastula stages, its level peaks in late cleavage, declines abruptly before ingression of primary mesenchyme cells and remains constant in late development. The distribution of the BP10 protein during its synthesis and secretion was analysed by immunostaining blastula-stage embryos. The intracellular localization of the BP10 staining varies with time. The protein is first detected in a perinuclear region, then in an apical and submembranous position just before its secretion into the perivitelline space. The protein is synthesized in a sharply delimited continuous territory spanning about 70% of the blastula. Comparison of the size and orientation of the labelled territory in the late blastula with the fate map of the blastula stage embryo shows that the domain in which the BP10 gene is expressed corresponds to the presumptive ectoderm. Developing embryos treated with purified antibodies against the BP10 protein and with synthetic peptides derived from the EGF-like domain displayed perturbations in morphogenesis and were radialized to various degrees. These results are consistent with a role for BP10 in the differentiation of ectodermal lineages and subsequent patterning of the embryo. On the basis of these results, we speculate that the role of BP10 in the sea urchin embryo might be similar to that of tolloid in Drosophila. We discuss the idea that the processes of spatial regulation of gene expression along the animal-vegetal in sea urchin and dorsal-ventral axes in Drosophila might have some similarities and might use common elements.


Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (23) ◽  
pp. 4691-4704 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ting Chang ◽  
Julie Mazotta ◽  
Karin Dumstrei ◽  
Andra Dumitrescu ◽  
Volker Hartenstein

We have analyzed the function of the Decapentaplegic (Dpp) and Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathways in partitioning the dorsal head neurectoderm of the Drosophila embryo. This region, referred to as the anterior brain/eye anlage, gives rise to both the visual system and the protocerebrum. The anlage splits up into three main domains: the head midline ectoderm, protocerebral neurectoderm and visual primordium. Similar to their vertebrate counterparts, Hh and Dpp play an important role in the partitioning of the anterior brain/eye anlage. Dpp is secreted in the dorsal midline of the head. Lowering Dpp levels (in dpp heterozygotes or hypomorphic alleles) results in a ‘cyclops’ phenotype, where mid-dorsal head epidermis is transformed into dorsolateral structures, i.e. eye/optic lobe tissue, which causes a continuous visual primordium across the dorsal midline. Absence of Dpp results in the transformation of both dorsomedial and dorsolateral structures into brain neuroblasts. Regulatory genes that are required for eye/optic lobe fate, including sine oculis (so) and eyes absent (eya), are turned on in their respective domains by Dpp. The gene zerknuellt (zen), which is expressed in response to peak levels of Dpp in the dorsal midline, secondarily represses so and eya in the dorsomedial domain. Hh and its receptor/inhibitor, Patched (Ptc), are expressed in a transverse stripe along the posterior boundary of the eye field. As reported previously, Hh triggers the expression of determinants for larval eye (atonal) and adult eye (eyeless) in those cells of the eye field that are close to the Hh source. Eya and So, which are induced by Dpp, are epistatic to the Hh signal. Loss of Ptc, as well as overexpression of Hh, results in the ectopic induction of larval eye tissue in the dorsal midline (cyclopia). We discuss the similarities between vertebrate systems and Drosophila with regard to the fate map of the anterior brain/eye anlage, and its partitioning by Dpp and Hh signaling.


Development ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 65 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 309-325
Author(s):  
Donene A. Rowe ◽  
John F. Fallon

Recent experiments, in which barriers were inserted between anterior and posterior tissues of the chick wing bud, resulted in deletion of structures anterior to the barrier (Summerbell, 1979). From these data it was concluded that blockage of morphogen from the polarizing zone by the barrier resulted in the observed failure of specification of anterior structures. We suggest an alternative interpretation, viz. the interruption of the apical ridge by the barrier caused the deletions. This hypothesis was tested by removal of increasing lengths of ridge. This was done beginning at either the anterior or posterior junction of the wing bud with the body wall and proceeding posteriorly or anteriorly, respectively, to each half-somite level between 16/17 and 19/20. With removal of progressively greater lengths of anterior ridge, more anterior limb elements failed to develop. These data were used to construct a map of the ridge responsible for each digit. To test our hypothesis we removed posterior sections of apical ridge, as described above. Removal of posterior ridge to a level which was expected to allow outgrowth of digits anterior to the level of removal resulted in wings without digits in the majority of cases. An exception occurred when ridge posterior to the mid-19 somite level was removed. In almost half of these cases digits 2 and 3 did develop. In most cases the retention of only a half-somite piece of ridge with all other ridge removed, also resulted in deletion of all digits. Again the exception occurred when ridge posterior to somite level mid-19 and anterior to level 18/19 was removed, leaving only that ridge between somite level 18/19 and mid-19. In many of these cases digit 3 did develop. We conclude from these data that, in the wing bud, ridge anterior to the mid-19 somite level must be connected to more posterior ridge to function. The leg ridge does not exhibit the asymmetrical, low anterior, high posterior configuration, which appears in the wing. Because the leg ridge is symmetrically high anteriorly and posteriorly, we questioned whether or not leg would also require a continuity between anterior and posterior ridge for anterior ridge to function. It did not. When posterior ridge was removed, structures developed under remaining anterior ridge and the elements which developed were complementary to those which developed after anterior ridge removal to the same somite level. Those leg elements, which failed to develop, were truncated at the appropriate proximodistal levels as indicated by the fate map we have constructed for the leg. The data reported here do not rule out a role for the polarizing zone in specification of anterior structures. It is apparent that posterior ridge removal in the wing results in loss of structures anterior to the removal. However, this is not true for the leg.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document