Pattern formation in the imaginal wing disc ofDrosophila melanogaster: Fate map, regeneration and duplication

1975 ◽  
Vol 193 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-77 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Bryant
Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (16) ◽  
pp. 3815-3823 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florencia Cavodeassi ◽  
Isabel Rodríguez ◽  
Juan Modolell

During development, the imaginal wing disc of Drosophila is subdivided along the proximal-distal axis into different territories that will give rise to body wall (notum and mesothoracic pleura) and appendage (wing hinge and wing blade). Expression of the Iroquois complex (Iro-C) homeobox genes in the most proximal part of the disc defines the notum, since Iro-C– cells within this territory acquire the identity of the adjacent distal region, the wing hinge. Here we analyze how the expression of Iro-C is confined to the notum territory. Neither Wingless signalling, which is essential for wing development, nor Vein-dependent EGFR signalling, which is needed to activate Iro-C, appear to delimit Iro-C expression. We show that a main effector of this confinement is the TGFβ homolog Decapentaplegic (Dpp), a molecule known to pattern the disc along its anterior-posterior axis. At early second larval instar, the Dpp signalling pathway functions only in the wing and hinge territories, represses Iro-C and confines its expression to the notum territory. Later, Dpp becomes expressed in the most proximal part of the notum and turns off Iro-C in this region. This downregulation is associated with the subdivision of the notum into medial and lateral regions.


Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (12) ◽  
pp. 4095-4103 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.A. Lawrence ◽  
B. Sanson ◽  
J.P. Vincent

Recent experiments on the wing disc of Drosophila have shown that cells at the interface between the anterior and posterior compartments drive pattern formation by becoming the source of a morphogen. Here we ask whether this model applies to the ventral embryonic epidermis. First, we show that interfaces between posterior (engrailed ON) and anterior (engrailed OFF) cells are required for pattern formation. Second, we provide evidence that Wingless could play the role of the morphogen, at least within part of the segmental pattern. We looked at the cuticular structures that develop after different levels of uniform Wingless activity are added back to unsegmented embryos (wingless- engrailed-). Because it is rich in landmarks, the T1 segment is a good region to analyse. There, we find that the cuticle formed depends on the amount of added Wingless activity. For example, a high concentration of Wingless gives the cuticle elements normally found near the top of the presumed gradient. Unsegmented embryos are much shorter than wild type. If Wingless activity is added in stripes, the embryos are longer than if it is added uniformly. We suggest that the Wingless gradient landscape affects the size of the embryo, so that steep slopes would allow cells to survive and divide, while an even distribution of morphogen would promote cell death. Supporting the hypothesis that Wingless acts as a morphogen, we find that these stripes affect, at a distance, the type of cuticle formed and the planar polarity of the cells.


Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 271-278 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Pignoni ◽  
S.L. Zipursky

The Drosophila decapentaplegic (dpp) gene, encoding a secreted protein of the transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta) superfamily, controls proliferation and patterning in diverse tissues, including the eye imaginal disc. Pattern formation in this tissue is initiated at the posterior edge and moves anteriorly as a wave; the front of this wave is called the morphogenetic furrow (MF). Dpp is required for proliferation and initiation of pattern formation at the posterior edge of the eye disc. It has also been suggested that Dpp is the principal mediator of Hedgehog function in driving progression of the MF across the disc. In this paper, ectopic Dpp expression is shown to be sufficient to induce a duplicated eye disc with normal shape, MF progression, neuronal cluster formation and direction of axon outgrowth. Induction of ectopic eye development occurs preferentially along the anterior margin of the eye disc. Ectopic Dpp clones situated away from the margins induce neither proliferation nor patterning. The Dpp signalling pathway is shown to be under tight transcriptional and post-transcriptional control within different spatial domains in the developing eye disc. In addition, Dpp positively controls its own expression and suppresses wingless transcription. In contrast to the wing disc, Dpp does not appear to be the principal mediator of Hedgehog function in the eye.


2015 ◽  
Vol 51 (10) ◽  
pp. 1040-1043
Author(s):  
E. V. Marilovtseva ◽  
L. V. Omelyanchuk

Development ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 129 (18) ◽  
pp. 4261-4269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michèle Crozatier ◽  
Bruno Glise ◽  
Alain Vincent

Hedgehog (Hh) signalling from posterior (P) to anterior (A) cells is the primary determinant of AP polarity in the limb field in insects and vertebrates. Hh acts in part by inducing expression of Decapentaplegic (Dpp), but how Hh and Dpp together pattern the central region of the Drosophila wing remains largely unknown. We have re-examined the role played by Collier (Col), a dose-dependent Hh target activated in cells along the AP boundary, the AP organiser in the imaginal wing disc. We found that col mutant wings are smaller than wild type and lack L4 vein, in addition to missing the L3-L4 intervein and mis-positioning of the anterior L3 vein. We link these phenotypes to col requirement for the local upregulation of both emc and N, two genes involved in the control of cell proliferation, the EGFR ligand Vein and the intervein determination gene blistered. We further show that attenuation of Dpp signalling in the AP organiser is also col dependent and, in conjunction with Vein upregulation, required for formation of L4 vein. A model recapitulating the molecular interplay between the Hh, Dpp and EGF signalling pathways in the wing AP organiser is presented.


Development ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 65 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 309-325
Author(s):  
Donene A. Rowe ◽  
John F. Fallon

Recent experiments, in which barriers were inserted between anterior and posterior tissues of the chick wing bud, resulted in deletion of structures anterior to the barrier (Summerbell, 1979). From these data it was concluded that blockage of morphogen from the polarizing zone by the barrier resulted in the observed failure of specification of anterior structures. We suggest an alternative interpretation, viz. the interruption of the apical ridge by the barrier caused the deletions. This hypothesis was tested by removal of increasing lengths of ridge. This was done beginning at either the anterior or posterior junction of the wing bud with the body wall and proceeding posteriorly or anteriorly, respectively, to each half-somite level between 16/17 and 19/20. With removal of progressively greater lengths of anterior ridge, more anterior limb elements failed to develop. These data were used to construct a map of the ridge responsible for each digit. To test our hypothesis we removed posterior sections of apical ridge, as described above. Removal of posterior ridge to a level which was expected to allow outgrowth of digits anterior to the level of removal resulted in wings without digits in the majority of cases. An exception occurred when ridge posterior to the mid-19 somite level was removed. In almost half of these cases digits 2 and 3 did develop. In most cases the retention of only a half-somite piece of ridge with all other ridge removed, also resulted in deletion of all digits. Again the exception occurred when ridge posterior to somite level mid-19 and anterior to level 18/19 was removed, leaving only that ridge between somite level 18/19 and mid-19. In many of these cases digit 3 did develop. We conclude from these data that, in the wing bud, ridge anterior to the mid-19 somite level must be connected to more posterior ridge to function. The leg ridge does not exhibit the asymmetrical, low anterior, high posterior configuration, which appears in the wing. Because the leg ridge is symmetrically high anteriorly and posteriorly, we questioned whether or not leg would also require a continuity between anterior and posterior ridge for anterior ridge to function. It did not. When posterior ridge was removed, structures developed under remaining anterior ridge and the elements which developed were complementary to those which developed after anterior ridge removal to the same somite level. Those leg elements, which failed to develop, were truncated at the appropriate proximodistal levels as indicated by the fate map we have constructed for the leg. The data reported here do not rule out a role for the polarizing zone in specification of anterior structures. It is apparent that posterior ridge removal in the wing results in loss of structures anterior to the removal. However, this is not true for the leg.


1983 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-26 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brooke S. Kirby ◽  
Peter J. Bryant ◽  
Howard A. Schneiderman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document