Cranial paraxial mesoderm: regionalisation of cell fate and impact on craniofacial development in mouse embryos

Development ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 120 (9) ◽  
pp. 2397-2408 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.A. Trainor ◽  
S.S. Tan ◽  
P.P. Tam
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Cell Fate ◽  
Motor Neurons ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Cell Labelling ◽  
Developmental Fate ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells

A combination of micromanipulative cell grafting and fluorescent cell labelling techniques were used to examine the developmental fate of the cranial paraxial mesoderm of the 8.5-day early-somite-stage mouse embryo. Mesodermal cells isolated from seven regions of the cranial mesoderm, identified on the basis of their topographical association with specific brain segments were assessed for their contribution to craniofacial morphogenesis during 48 hours of in vitro development. The results demonstrate extensive cell mixing between adjacent but not alternate groups of mesodermal cells and a strict cranial-to-caudal distribution of the paraxial mesoderm to craniofacial structures. A two-segment periodicity similar to the origins of the branchial motor neurons and the distribution of the rhombencephalic neural crest cells was observed as the paraxial mesoderm migrates during formation of the first three branchial arches. The paraxial mesoderm colonises the mesenchymal core of the branchial arches, consistent with the location of the muscle plates. A dorsoventral regionalisation of cell fate similar to that of the somitic mesoderm is also found. This suggests evolution has conserved the fate of the murine cranial paraxial mesoderm as a multiprogenitor population which displays a predominantly myogenic fate. Heterotopic transplantation of cells to different regions of the cranial mesoderm revealed no discernible restriction in cell potency in the craniocaudal axis, reflecting considerable plasticity in the developmental fate of the cranial mesoderm at least at the time of experimentation. The distribution of the different groups of cranial mesoderm matches closely with that of the cranial neural crest cells suggesting the two cell populations may share a common segmental origin and similar destination.

Cranial paraxial mesoderm and neural crest cells of the mouse embryo: co-distribution in the craniofacial mesenchyme but distinct segregation in branchial arches

Development ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 121 (8) ◽  
pp. 2569-2582 ◽  
Author(s):  
P.A. Trainor ◽  
P.P. Tam
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Mouse Embryo ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Cell Populations ◽  
Cell Labelling ◽  
Mouse Development ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Early Mouse ◽  
Derivatives Of

The spatial distribution of the cranial paraxial mesoderm and the neural crest cells during craniofacial morphogenesis of the mouse embryo was studied by micromanipulative cell grafting and cell labelling. Results of this study show that the paraxial mesoderm and neural crest cells arising at the same segmental position share common destinations. Mesodermal cells from somitomeres I, III, IV and VI were distributed to the same craniofacial tissues as neural crest cells of the forebrain, the caudal midbrain, and the rostral, middle and caudal hindbrains found respectively next to these mesodermal segments. This finding suggests that a basic meristic pattern is established globally in the neural plate ectoderm and paraxial mesoderm during early mouse development. Cells from these two sources mixed extensively in the peri-ocular, facial, periotic and cervical mesenchyme. However, within the branchial arches a distinct segregation of these two cell populations was discovered. Neural crest cells colonised the periphery of the branchial arches and enveloped the somitomere-derived core tissues on the rostral, lateral and caudal sides of the arch. Such segregation of cell populations in the first three branchial arches is apparent at least until the 10.5-day hindlimb bud stage and could be important for the patterning of the skeletal and myogenic derivatives of the arches.

Pax3 is required for cardiac neural crest migration in the mouse: evidence from the splotch (Sp2H) mutant

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (2) ◽  
pp. 505-514 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.J. Conway ◽  
D.J. Henderson ◽  
A.J. Copp
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Tube ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Outflow Tract ◽  
Avian Embryo ◽  
Cardiac Neural Crest ◽  
Branchial Arches ◽  
Aortic Arches ◽  
Cardiac Outflow

Neural crest cells originating in the occipital region of the avian embryo are known to play a vital role in formation of the septum of the cardiac outflow tract and to contribute cells to the aortic arches, thymus, thyroid and parathyroids. This ‘cardiac’ neural crest sub-population is assumed to exist in mammals, but without direct evidence. In this paper we demonstrate, using RT-PCR and in situ hybridisation, that Pax3 expression can serve as a marker of cardiac neural crest cells in the mouse embryo. Cells of this lineage were traced from the occipital neural tube, via branchial arches 3, 4 and 6, into the aortic sac and aorto-pulmonary outflow tract. Confirmation that these Pax3-positive cells are indeed cardiac neural crest is provided by experiments in which hearts were deprived of a source of colonising neural crest, by organ culture in vitro, with consequent lack of up-regulation of Pax3. Occipital neural crest cell outgrowths in vitro were also shown to express Pax3. Mutation of Pax3, as occurs in the splotch (Sp2H) mouse, results in development of conotruncal heart defects including persistent truncus arteriosus. Homozygotes also exhibit defects of the aortic arches, thymus, thyroid and parathyroids. Pax3-positive neural crest cells were found to emigrate from the occipital neural tube of Sp2H/Sp2H embryos in a relatively normal fashion, but there was a marked deficiency or absence of neural crest cells traversing branchial arches 3, 4 and 6, and entering the cardiac outflow tract. This decreased expression of Pax3 in Sp2H/Sp2H embryos was not due to down-regulation of Pax3 in neural crest cells, as use of independent neural crest markers, Hoxa-3, CrabpI, Prx1, Prx2 and c-met also revealed a deficiency of migrating cardiac neural crest cells in homozygous embryos. This work demonstrates the essential role of the cardiac neural crest in formation of the heart and great vessels in the mouse and, furthermore, shows that Pax3 function is required for the cardiac neural crest to complete its migration to the developing heart.

The developmental fate of the cephalic mesoderm in quail-chick chimeras

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 114 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.F. Couly ◽  
P.M. Coltey ◽  
N.M. Le Douarin
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Avian Embryo ◽  
Facial Skeleton ◽  
Developmental Fate ◽  
Prechordal Mesoderm ◽  
The Face ◽  
Neural Crest Origin ◽  
Neurula Stage

The developmental fate of the cephalic paraxial and prechordal mesoderm at the late neurula stage (3-somite) in the avian embryo has been investigated by using the isotopic, isochronic substitution technique between quail and chick embryos. The territories involved in the operation were especially tiny and the size of the transplants was of about 150 by 50 to 60 microns. At that stage, the neural crest cells have not yet started migrating and the fate of mesodermal cells exclusively was under scrutiny. The prechordal mesoderm was found to give rise to the following ocular muscles: musculus rectus ventralis and medialis and musculus oblicus ventralis. The paraxial mesoderm was separated in two longitudinal bands: one median, lying upon the cephalic vesicles (median paraxial mesoderm—MPM); one lateral, lying upon the foregut (lateral paraxial mesoderm—LPM). The former yields the three other ocular muscles, contributes to mesencephalic meninges and has essentially skeletogenic potencies. It contributes to the corpus sphenoid bone, the orbitosphenoid bone and the otic capsules; the rest of the facial skeleton is of neural crest origin. At 3-somite stage, MPM is represented by a few cells only. The LPM is more abundant at that stage and has essentially myogenic potencies with also some contribution to connective tissue. However, most of the connective cells associated with the facial and hypobranchial muscles are of neural crest origin. The more important result of this work was to show that the cephalic mesoderm does not form dermis. This function is taken over by neural crest cells, which form both the skeleton and dermis of the face. If one draws a parallel between the so-called “somitomeres” of the head and the trunk somites, it appears that skeletogenic potencies are reduced in the former, which in contrast have kept their myogenic capacities, whilst the formation of skeleton and dermis has been essentially taken over by the neural crest in the course of evolution of the vertebrate head.

The chinless mutation and neural crest cell interactions in zebrafish jaw development

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1417-1426 ◽  
Author(s):  
T.F. Schilling ◽  
C. Walker ◽  
C.B. Kimmel
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Cell ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Host Genotype ◽  
Pharyngeal Arches ◽  
Expression Studies ◽  
Gene Expression Studies ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells

During vertebrate development, neural crest cells are thought to pattern many aspects of head organization, including the segmented skeleton and musculature of the jaw and gills. Here we describe mutations at the gene chinless, chn, that disrupt the skeletal fates of neural crest cells in the head of the zebrafish and their interactions with muscle precursors. chn mutants lack neural-crest-derived cartilage and mesoderm-derived muscles in all seven pharyngeal arches. Fate mapping and gene expression studies demonstrate the presence of both undifferentiated cartilage and muscle precursors in mutants. However, chn blocks differentiation directly in neural crest, and not in mesoderm, as revealed by mosaic analyses. Neural crest cells taken from wild-type donor embryos can form cartilage when transplanted into chn mutant hosts and rescue some of the patterning defects of mutant pharyngeal arches. In these cases, cartilage only forms if neural crest is transplanted at least one hour before its migration, suggesting that interactions occur transiently in early jaw precursors. In contrast, transplanted cells in paraxial mesoderm behave according to the host genotype; mutant cells form jaw muscles in a wild-type environment. These results suggest that chn is required for the development of pharyngeal cartilages from cranial neural crest cells and subsequent crest signals that pattern mesodermally derived myocytes.

scholarly journals Cranial Neural Crest Cells and Their Role in the Pathogenesis of Craniofacial Anomalies and Coronal Craniosynostosis

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica M. Siismets ◽  
Nan E. Hatch
Keyword(s):  
Neural Crest ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Parietal Bone ◽  
Paraxial Mesoderm ◽  
Treacher Collins Syndrome ◽  
Craniofacial Anomalies ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest ◽  
Craniofacial Skeleton ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells

Craniofacial anomalies are among the most common of birth defects. The pathogenesis of craniofacial anomalies frequently involves defects in the migration, proliferation, and fate of neural crest cells destined for the craniofacial skeleton. Genetic mutations causing deficient cranial neural crest migration and proliferation can result in Treacher Collins syndrome, Pierre Robin sequence, and cleft palate. Defects in post-migratory neural crest cells can result in pre- or post-ossification defects in the developing craniofacial skeleton and craniosynostosis (premature fusion of cranial bones/cranial sutures). The coronal suture is the most frequently fused suture in craniosynostosis syndromes. It exists as a biological boundary between the neural crest-derived frontal bone and paraxial mesoderm-derived parietal bone. The objective of this review is to frame our current understanding of neural crest cells in craniofacial development, craniofacial anomalies, and the pathogenesis of coronal craniosynostosis. We will also discuss novel approaches for advancing our knowledge and developing prevention and/or treatment strategies for craniofacial tissue regeneration and craniosynostosis.

Effects of vitamin A on the behaviour of migratory neural crest cells in vitro

1982 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 331-350 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Thorogood ◽  
L. Smith ◽  
A. Nicol ◽  
R. McGinty ◽  
D. Garrod
Keyword(s):  
Cell Surface ◽  
Neural Crest ◽  
Neural Crest Cells ◽  
Initial Exposure ◽  
Normal Medium ◽  
Locomotory Behaviour ◽  
Cranial Neural Crest Cells ◽  
In Vivo Effects

It has been proposed elsewhere that the teratogenic effects of retinoids on craniofacial morphogenesis are caused by a disturbance of the migration of cranial neural crest cells. The effects of 3.5 X 10(−5) M and 3.5 X 10(−6) M-retinol on the migration of avian neural crest cells in vitro have been investigated by monitoring cell morphology, locomotory behaviour, fibronectin distribution and actin-microfilament organization. Retinol retards migration by affecting cell-to-substratum adhesiveness. Cells exposed to medium containing retinol are less adherent to the substratum, and although the cell surface is very mobile, are unable to extend or maintain lamellipodia. As a consequence the cells do not actively translocate. Fibronectin distribution at the cell surface is sparse, possibly as a result of shedding, and actin distribution remains diffuse. At the retinol molarities used all these effects are reversible. Thus cells allowed to recover in normal medium flatten out, display lamellipodia and commence active translocation. Fibronectin becomes organized into a fibrillar array and actin microfilaments become organized into cables. The period needed for this recovery is directly related to the molarity of retinol during the initial exposure; after recovery the retinol-treated cells are virtually indistinguishable from control cells. We propose that in vivo the effects of retinoids might be to impair cell-extracellular matrix interaction, thus impeding a cell's ability to migrate through that matrix. Contrary to previous suggestions, the in vivo effects are probably not in any way ‘specific’ to neural crest cells but are more accurately considered as ‘selective’, in that any cell undergoing migration would be similarly affected.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document