Regulation of imprinted X-chromosome inactivation in mice by Tsix

Development ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 128 (8) ◽  
pp. 1275-1286 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Sado ◽  
Z. Wang ◽  
H. Sasaki ◽  
E. Li
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Maternal Allele ◽  
Xist Expression ◽  
Developmental Defects ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Embryonic Tissues ◽  
Early Embryonic Lethality

In mammals, X-chromosome inactivation is imprinted in the extra-embryonic lineages with paternal X chromosome being preferentially inactivated. In this study, we investigate the role of Tsix, the antisense transcript from the Xist locus, in regulation of Xist expression and X-inactivation. We show that Tsix is transcribed from two putative promoters and its transcripts are processed. Expression of Tsix is first detected in blastocysts and is imprinted with only the maternal allele transcribed. The imprinted expression of Tsix persists in the extra-embryonic tissues after implantation, but is erased in embryonic tissues. To investigate the function of Tsix in X-inactivation, we disrupted Tsix by insertion of an IRES(β)geo cassette in the second exon, which blocked transcripts from both promoters. While disruption of the paternal Tsix allele has no adverse effects on embryonic development, inheritance of a disrupted maternal allele results in ectopic Xist expression and early embryonic lethality, owing to inactivation of both X chromosomes in females and single X chromosome in males. Further, early developmental defects of female embryos with maternal transmission of Tsix mutation can be rescued by paternal inheritance of the Xist deletion. These results provide genetic evidence that Tsix plays a crucial role in maintaining Xist silencing in cis and in regulation of imprinted X-inactivation in the extra-embryonic tissues.

Getting to the center of X-chromosome inactivation: the role of transgenesThis paper is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue, entitled 30th Annual International Asilomar Chromatin and Chromosomes Conference, and has undergone the Journal’s usual peer review process.

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (5) ◽  
pp. 759-766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jakub Minks ◽  
Carolyn J. Brown
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Peer Review Process ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Xist Expression ◽  
Inactivation Center ◽  
Xist Rna ◽  
Epigenetic Phenomenon

X-chromosome inactivation is a fascinating epigenetic phenomenon that is initiated by expression of a noncoding (nc)RNA, XIST, and results in transcriptional silencing of 1 female X. The process requires a series of events that begins even before XIST expression, and culminates in an active and a silent X within the same nucleus. We will focus on the role that transgenic systems have served in the current understanding of the process of X-chromosome inactivation, both in the initial delineation of an active and inactive X, and in the function of the XIST RNA. X inactivation is strictly cis-limited; recent studies have revealed elements within the X-inactivation center, the region required for inactivation, that are critical for the initial regulation of Xist expression and chromosome pairing. It has been revealed that the X-inactivation center contains a remarkable compendium of cis-regulatory elements, ncRNAs, and trans-acting pairing regions. We review the functional componentry of the X-inactivation center and discuss experiments that helped to dissect the XIST/Xist RNA and its involvement in the establishment of facultative heterochromatin.

Imprint switching for non-random X-chromosome inactivation during mouse oocyte growth

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (14) ◽  
pp. 3101-3105 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Tada ◽  
Y. Obata ◽  
M. Tada ◽  
Y. Goto ◽  
N. Nakatsuji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Replication Timing ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Nuclear Transplantation ◽  
Chromosome X ◽  
Oocyte Growth ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Embryonic Tissues ◽  
Extraembryonic Tissues

In mammals, X-chromosome inactivation occurs in all female cells, leaving only a single active X chromosome. This serves to equalise the dosage of X-linked genes in male and female cells. In the mouse, the paternally derived X chromosome (X(P)) is imprinted and preferentially inactivated in the extraembryonic tissues whereas in the embryonic tissues inactivation is random. To investigate how X(P) is chosen as an inactivated X chromosome in the extraembryonic cells, we have produced experimental embryos by serial nuclear transplantation from non-growing (ng) oocytes and fully grown (fg) oocytes, in which the X chromosomes are marked with (1) an X-linked lacZ reporter gene to assay X-chromosome activity, or (2) the Rb(X.9)6H translocation as a cytogenetic marker for studying replication timing. In the extraembryonic tissues of these ng/fg embryos, the maternal X chromosome (X(M)) derived from the ng oocyte was preferentially inactivated whereas that from the fg oocyte remained active. However, in the embryonic tissues, X inactivation was random. This suggests that (1) a maternal imprint is set on the X(M) during oocyte growth, (2) the maternal imprint serves to render the X(M) resistant to inactivation in the extraembryonic tissues and (3) the X(M) derived from an ng oocyte resembles a normal X(P).

Preferential X-chromosome inactivation, DNA methylation and imprinting

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 55-62
Author(s):  
Marilyn Monk ◽  
Mark Grant
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Early Development ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Genetic Material ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Differential Methylation ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Embryonic Tissues

Non-random X-chromosome inactivation in mammals was one of the first observed examples of differential expression dependent on the gamete of origin of the genetic material. The paternally-inherited X chromosome is preferentially inactive in all cells of female marsupials and in the extra-embryonic tissues of developing female rodents. Some form of parental imprinting during male and female gametogenesis must provide a recognition signal that determines the nonrandomness of X-inactivation but its nature is thus far unknown. In the mouse, the imprint distinguishing the X chromosomes in the extra-embryonic tissues must be erased early in development since X-inactivation is random in the embryonic cells. Random X-chromosome inactivation leads to cellular mosaicism in expression and differential methylation of active and inactive X-linked genes. Transgene imprinting shares many features with X-inactivation, including differential DNA methylation. In this paper we consider when methylation differences in early development affecting X-chromosome activity and imprinting are established. There are processes of methylation and demethylation occurring in early development, as well as changes in the activity of the DNA methylase itself. Methylation of a specific CpG site associated with activity of the X-linked PGK-1 gene has been studied. This site is already methylated on the inactive X chromosome by 6.5 days' gestation, close to the time of X-inactivation. However, differential methylation of this site is not the primary imprint marking the paternal X chromosome for preferential inactivation in the extra-embryonic membranes. A consideration of factors influencing both X-chromosome inactivation and imprinting suggests that a process of communication and comparison between nonidentical alleles might by the basis for the differential modification and expression patterns observed.

scholarly journals Species-specific differences in X chromosome inactivation in mammals

Reproduction ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 146 (4) ◽  
pp. R131-R139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Sado ◽  
Takehisa Sakaguchi
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Molecular Basis ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Inactive X Chromosome ◽  
Species Specific ◽  
Genetically Manipulated

In female mammals, the dosage difference in X-linked genes between XX females and XY males is compensated for by inactivating one of the two X chromosomes during early development. Since the discovery of the X inactive-specific transcript (XIST) gene in humans and its subsequent isolation of the mouse homolog, Xist, in the early 1990s, the molecular basis of X chromosome inactivation (X-inactivation) has been more fully elucidated using genetically manipulated mouse embryos and embryonic stem cells. Studies on X-inactivation in other mammals, although limited when compared with those in the mice, have revealed that, while their inactive X chromosome shares many features with those in the mice, there are marked differences in not only some epigenetic modifications of the inactive X chromosome but also when and how X-inactivation is initiated during early embryonic development. Such differences raise the issue about what extent of the molecular basis of X-inactivation in the mice is commonly shared among others. Recognizing similarities and differences in X-inactivation among mammals may provide further insight into our understanding of not only the evolutionary but also the molecular aspects for the mechanism of X-inactivation. Here, we reviewed species-specific differences in X-inactivation and discussed what these differences may reveal.

scholarly journals Mechanisms of Choice in X-Chromosome Inactivation

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Furlan ◽  
Rafael Galupa
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Current Understanding ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Chromosomes

Early in development, placental and marsupial mammals harbouring at least two X chromosomes per nuclei are faced with a choice that affects the rest of their lives: which of those X chromosomes to transcriptionally inactivate. This choice underlies phenotypical diversity in the composition of tissues and organs and in their response to environment, and can determine whether an individual will be healthy or affected by an X-linked disease. Here, we review our current understanding of the process of choice during X-chromosome inactivation and its implications, focusing on the strategies evolved by different mammalian lineages and on the known and unknown molecular mechanisms and players involved. We also call for a revised manner in which to think about choice during random X-inactivation.

X-Chromosome Inactivation in Marsupials

1989 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 411 ◽  
Author(s):  
DW Cooper ◽  
PG Johnston ◽  
JL Vandeberg ◽  
ES Robinson
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Phosphoglycerate Kinase ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Hypoxanthine Phosphoribosyl Transferase ◽  
Late Replication ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Y Chromosomes

Marsupial (metatherian) mammals resemble their eutherian ('placental') counterparts in having inacti- vation of one of the two X chromosomes in the soma and premeiotic germ cells of their females. The marsupial X-inactivation system differs from the eutherian system in two respects: firstly, inactivation occurs for the paternally derived allele, i.e. it is not random, and secondly it is often incomplete. Data are available for four X-linked loci, all controlling enzyme structure: glucose-6- phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD), phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGKl), alpha-galactosidase (GLA) and hypoxanthine phosphoribosyl transferase (HPRT). Both the G6PD and PGKl loci exhibit incomplete X-chromosome inactivation. The pattern of partial expression differs from tissue to tissue and from species to species. One of the two X chromosomes exhibits late replication, even in cells where a paternally derived gene is partly active, showing that late replication and absence of transcription are not completely correlated. Sex chromatin bodies are not as easily found as in some eutherians. In marsupials they are most clearly demonstrable in species with small Y chromosomes. Investigations into X-inactivation in early development have just begun. Absence of inactivation at the G6PD locus in yolk sac of a kangaroo has been observed. All other tissues exhibited complete paternal X-inacti- vation for G6PD. In a dasyurid, GLA showed complete paternal X-inactivation in all embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues. The role, if any, of methylation of cytosine residues in CpG pairs in the maintenance of X-inactivation in marsupials is unclear. Preliminary evidence indicates that sex-specific differences in methylation of sex linked genes do exist in marsupials.

Autosomal and X-chromosome imprinting

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. 63-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruce M. Cattanach ◽  
Colin V. Beechey
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Somatic Cells ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Embryonic Tissues ◽  
Chromosome Imprinting ◽  
Mouse Genetic

Mouse genetic studies using Robertsonian and reciprocal translations have shown that certain autosomal regions of loci are subject to a parental germ line imprint, which renders maternal and paternal copies functionally inequivalent in the embryo or later stages of development. Duplication of maternal or paternal copies with corresponding paternal/maternal deficiencies in chromosomally balanced zygotes causes various effects. These range from early embryonic lethalities through to mid-fetal and neonatal lethalities, and in some instances viable young with phenotypic effects are obtained. Eight to nine chromosomal regions that give such imprinting effects have been identified. Six to seven of these regions are located in only three chromosomes (2, 7 and 17). The two other regions are located in chromosomes 6 and 11. Maternal and paternal disomies for each of four other chromosomes (1, 5, 9 and 14) have been recovered with different frequencies, but the possibility that this may be due to imprinting has yet to be supported by follow-up studies on regions of the chromosomes concerned. No clear evidence of genetic-background modifications of the imprinting process have been observed in these mouse genetic experiments. The mammalian X chromosome is also subject to imprinting, as demonstrated by the non-random, paternal X-inactivation in female mouse extra-embryonic tissues and in the somatic cells of marsupial females. There is also the opposite bias towards inactivation of the maternal X in the somatic cells of female mice. On the basis that both X-chromosome inactivation and autosomal chromosome imprinting may be concerned with gene regulation, it is suggested that evidence from X-chromosome inactivation studies may help to elucidate factors underlying the imprinting of autosomes. The relevant aspects of X-inactivation are summarized.

scholarly journals Escape from X Chromosome Inactivation and the Female Predominance in Autoimmune Diseases

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1114
Author(s):  
Ali Youness ◽  
Charles-Henry Miquel ◽  
Jean-Charles Guéry
Keyword(s):  
Autoimmune Diseases ◽  
X Chromosome ◽  
Gene Dosage ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Chromosomes ◽  
Female Sex Hormones ◽  
Inactive X Chromosome ◽  
Immune Related Genes ◽  
Female Specific

Women represent 80% of people affected by autoimmune diseases. Although, many studies have demonstrated a role for sex hormone receptor signaling, particularly estrogens, in the direct regulation of innate and adaptive components of the immune system, recent data suggest that female sex hormones are not the only cause of the female predisposition to autoimmunity. Besides sex steroid hormones, growing evidence points towards the role of X-linked genetic factors. In female mammals, one of the two X chromosomes is randomly inactivated during embryonic development, resulting in a cellular mosaicism, where about one-half of the cells in a given tissue express either the maternal X chromosome or the paternal one. X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is however not complete and 15 to 23% of genes from the inactive X chromosome (Xi) escape XCI, thereby contributing to the emergence of a female-specific heterogeneous population of cells with bi-allelic expression of some X-linked genes. Although the direct contribution of this genetic mechanism in the female susceptibility to autoimmunity still remains to be established, the cellular mosaicism resulting from XCI escape is likely to create a unique functional plasticity within female immune cells. Here, we review recent findings identifying key immune related genes that escape XCI and the relationship between gene dosage imbalance and functional responsiveness in female cells.

Random X-chromosome inactivation in female primordial germ cells in the mouse

Development ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 64 (1) ◽  
pp. 251-258
Author(s):  
Andy McMahon ◽  
Mandy Fosten ◽  
Marilyn Monk
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Germ Cells ◽  
Germ Line ◽  
Primordial Germ Cells ◽  
Phosphoglycerate Kinase ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Yolk Sac ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Chromosomes

The pattern of expression of the two X chromosomes was investigated in pre-meiotic germ cells from 12½-day-old female embryos heterozygous for the variant electrophoretic forms of the X-linked enzyme phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK-1). If such germ cells carry the preferentially active Searle's translocated X chromosome (Lyon, Searle, Ford & Ohno, 1964), then only the Pgk-1 allele on this chromosome is expressed. This confirms Johnston's evidence (1979,1981) that Pgk-1 expression reflects a single active X chromosome at this time. Extracts of 12½-day germ cells from heterozygous females carrying two normal X chromosomes show both the A and the B forms of PGK; since only one X chromosome in each cell is active, different alleles must be expressed in different cells, suggesting that X-chromosome inactivation is normally random in the germ line. This result makes it unlikely that germ cells are derived from the yolk-sac endoderm where the paternally derived X chromosome is preferentially inactivated. In their pattern of X-chromosome inactivation, germ cells evidently resemble other tissues derived from the epiblast.

X-chromosome inactivation in XX androgenetic mouse embryos surviving implantation

Development ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 127 (19) ◽  
pp. 4137-4145 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Okamoto ◽  
S. Tan ◽  
N. Takagi
Keyword(s):  
X Chromosome ◽  
Ectopic Expression ◽  
Blastocyst Stage ◽  
X Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
X Inactivation ◽  
Chromosome Inactivation ◽  
Current View ◽  
Replication Banding ◽  
Xist Rna ◽  
Morula Stage

Using genetic and cytogenetic markers, we assessed early development and X-chromosome inactivation (X-inactivation) in XX mouse androgenones produced by pronuclear transfer. Contrary to the current view, XX androgenones are capable of surviving to embryonic day 7.5, achieving basically random X-inactivation in all tissues including those derived from the trophectoderm and primitive endoderm that are characterized by paternal X-activation in fertilized embryos. This finding supports the hypothesis that in fertilized female embryos, the maternal X chromosome remains active until the blastocyst stage because of a rigid imprint that prevents inactivation, whereas the paternal X chromosome is preferentially inactivated in extra-embryonic tissues owing to lack of such imprint. In spite of random X-inactivation in XX androgenones, FISH analyses revealed expression of stable Xist RNA from every X chromosome in XX and XY androgenonetic embryos from the four-cell to morula stage. Although the occurrence of inappropriate X-inactivation was further suggested by the finding that Xist continues ectopic expression in a proportion of cells from XX and XY androgenones at the blastocyst and the early egg cylinder stage, a replication banding study failed to provide positive evidence for inappropriate X-inactivation at E6. 5.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document