Shear thinning correction for rolling/sliding elastohydrodynamic film thickness

Author(s):  
S Bair
2015 ◽  
Vol 137 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Zolper ◽  
Paul Shiller ◽  
Manfred Jungk ◽  
Tobin J. Marks ◽  
Yip-Wah Chung ◽  
...  

Siloxane-based polymers (polysiloxanes) are susceptible to temporary shear-thinning that manifests as a reduction of elastohydrodynamic film thickness with increasing entrainment speed or effective shear rate. The departure from Newtonian film thickness can be predicted with the power-law exponent ns, an indicator of the severity of shear-thinning in a polymeric fluid that is influenced by the macromolecular structure. In this paper, a combination of extant rheological and tribological models is applied to determine the power-law exponent of several polysiloxanes using film thickness measurements. Film thickness data at several temperatures and slide-to-roll ratios are used to validate the methodology for several siloxane-based polymers with alkyl and aryl branches.


2021 ◽  
Vol 37 ◽  
pp. 282-290
Author(s):  
Junchao Zhu ◽  
Haiyu Qian ◽  
Huabing Wen ◽  
Liangyan Zheng ◽  
Hanhua Zhu

ABSTRACT This paper investigates journal bearings, and builds a lubrication model taking into account misalignment, the lubricant couple stress effect and shear thinning. In order to explore the sensitivity of couple stress fluid lubrication performance to oil film thickness, we introduce the critical oil film thickness coefficient. The results show that the sensitivity increases with the increase of the couple stress coefficient, and it is highest in the area of minimum oil film thickness. Compared with a parallel journal, increases in the misalignment angle strengthen the effect of couple stress. Shear thinning also plays an important role in bearing lubrication performance. For a low oil inlet temperature, the effect of shear thinning increases with the increase of the couple stress parameter. For a high oil inlet temperature, the influence is negligible. An increase in the misalignment angle will not further enhance the effect of shear thinning.


Author(s):  
I. I. Kudish ◽  
P. Kumar ◽  
M. M. Khonsary ◽  
S. Bair

The prediction of elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) film thickness requires knowledge of the lubricant properties. Today, in many instances, the properties have been obtained from a measurement of the central film thickness in an optical EHL point contact simulator and the assumption of a classical Newtonian film thickness formula. This technique has the practical advantage of using an effective pressure-viscosity coefficient which compensates for shear-thinning. We have shown by a perturbation analysis and by a full EHL numerical solution that the practice of extrapolating from a laboratory scale measurement of film thickness to the film thickness of an operating contact within a real machine may substantially overestimate the film thickness in the real machine if the machine scale is smaller and the lubricant is shear-thinning in the inlet zone.


Author(s):  
D. A. Jones ◽  
A. B. Crease

This paper describes an attempt to measure the elastohydrodynamic film thickness generated within the rolling contacts of a conventional taper roller thrust bearing. The technique used is simple and unambiguous and should be capable of application irrespective of the surface finish or geometry of the rolling elements.


2014 ◽  
Vol 136 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Puneet Katyal ◽  
Punit Kumar

This paper offers central film thickness formula pertaining to shear-thinning lubricants under rolling/sliding point contact conditions. The shear-thinning behavior of the lubricants is modeled using Carreau viscosity equation and the piezo-viscous response employed herein is the free-volume based Doolittle equation in conjunction with Tait's equation of state for lubricant compressibility. The present formulation is based on reciprocal asymptotic isoviscous piezo-viscous coefficient as it is a more accurate measure of the high pressure piezo-viscous response of elastohydrodynamic lubricated (EHL) lubricants compared to the conventional pressure–viscosity coefficient. Comparisons between simulated, curve-fitted values, and experimental results validate both the employed numerical approach and rheological model.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document