scholarly journals Pseudomyxoma Peritonei: A Need to Establish Evidence-Based Standard of Care—Is This the Right Trial?

2009 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. 2675-2677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Terence C. Chua ◽  
Khaled Al-Mohaimeed ◽  
Winston Liauw ◽  
David L. Morris
Keyword(s):  
Pseudomyxoma Peritonei ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
The Right

WITHWomen: User Centered Approach to the Design and Development of a suite of Intimate Partner Violence Screening and Safety Planning Web-Applications (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia O'Campo ◽  
Alisa Velonis ◽  
Pearl Buhariwala ◽  
Janisha Kamalanathan ◽  
Maha Awaiz Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Partner Violence ◽  
Web Applications ◽  
Lessons Learned ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Safety Planning ◽  
Future Design ◽  
Mhealth Technology ◽  
The Right ◽  
Safe Access ◽  
Health Applications

BACKGROUND The popularity of mHealth technology has resulted in the development of numerous applications for almost every type of self-improvement or disease management. M- and e-health solutions for increasing awareness about and safety around partner violence is no exception. OBJECTIVE These applications allow women to control access to these resources and provide unlimited, and with the right design features, safe access when these resources are needed. Few applications, however, have been designed in close collaboration with intended users to ensure relevance and effectiveness. METHODS We report here on the design of a pair of evidence-based m- and e-health applications to facilitate early identification of unsafe relationship behaviors and tailored safety planning to reduce harm from violence including the methods by which we collaborated with and sought input from population of intended users. RESULTS The demographic characteristics of those who participated in the various surveys and interviews to inform the development of our screening and safety-decision support app are presented in (Table 2). CONCLUSIONS Finally, we share challenges we faced and lessons learned that might inform future design efforts of m- and e-health evidence-based applications.

scholarly journals Hemodynamic Support Using Percutaneous Transfemoral Impella 5.0 and Impella RP for Refractory Cardiogenic Shock

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pratik K. Dalal ◽  
Amy Mertens ◽  
Dinesh Shah ◽  
Ivan Hanson
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Pulmonary Artery ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Ventricular Function ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Biventricular Failure ◽  
Ventricular Support ◽  
The Right ◽  
Flow Pump

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) resulting in cardiogenic shock continues to be a substantial source of morbidity and mortality despite advances in recognition and treatment. Prior to the advent of percutaneous and more durable left ventricular support devices, prompt revascularization with the addition of vasopressors and inotropes were the standard of care in the management of this critical population. Recent published studies have shown that in addition to prompt revascularization, unloading of the left ventricle with the placement of the Impella percutaneous axillary flow pump can lead to improvement in mortality. Parameters such as the cardiac power output (CPO) and pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi), obtained through pulmonary artery catheterization, can help ascertain the productivity of right and left ventricular function. Utilization of these parameters can provide the information necessary to escalate support to the right ventricle with the insertion of an Impella RP or the left ventricle with the insertion of larger devices, which provide more forward flow. Herein, we present a case of AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock resulting in biventricular failure treated with the percutaneous insertion of an Impella RP and Impella 5.0 utilizing invasive markers of left and right ventricular function to guide the management and escalation of care.

Championing Change to Save Lives: A Call to Action to Implement Reforms to Increase Use of Medications to Treat Opioid Use Disorder in Correctional Settings

2020 ◽  
pp. 073401682098162
Author(s):  
Sonia L. Canzater ◽  
Regina M. LaBelle
Keyword(s):  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Opioid Use Disorder ◽  
Correctional Facilities ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Call To Action ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment ◽  
High Prevalence ◽  
Correctional Settings ◽  
Overdose Deaths

The disproportional rates of opioid use disorder (OUD) in U.S. correctional facilities make them prime intervention points to treat OUD utilizing medication to treat opioid use disorder (MOUD), the evidence-based clinical standard of care. MOUD has been shown to be effective to support recovery and reduce recurrence of OUD, overdose deaths, and recidivism for justice-involved persons both while incarcerated and once they reenter their communities. Despite the high prevalence, most jails and prisons do not offer MOUD. Litigation has spurred expanded access in more facilities, but widespread MOUD access can only become a reality through a comprehensive effort of corrections officials, medical experts, advocates, legislators, and other champions to raise awareness and affect ideological and policy change. It is a legal and ethical imperative that the lives of justice-involved persons not be jeopardized by the lack of evidence-based treatment for OUD in correctional settings.

scholarly journals COVD-25. THE PARADOXICAL EFFECTS OF COVID-19 ON CANCER CARE IN THE NEURO-ONCOLOGY SETTING

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. ii26-ii26
Author(s):  
Nicole Cort ◽  
Alex Broom ◽  
Katherine Kenny ◽  
Alexander Page ◽  
Jennifer Durling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cancer Care ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Adult Brain ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Negative Consequences ◽  
Traditional Practice ◽  
Delivery Of Care ◽  
Paradoxical Effects ◽  
Oncology Care ◽  
The Impact

Abstract COVID-19 has caused ongoing interruptions to healthcare systems worldwide, shifting care to virtual platforms, and placing significant economic and logistical burdens on clinical practice. The pandemic has created uncertainty in delivering the standard of care, both in areas of cancer diagnosis and treatment, especially within neuro-oncology. Due to the pandemic, care and operational planning goals have shifted to infection prevention, modifying recommendations to decrease viral transmission and increasing telemedicine use, potentially creating a burden on implementing evidence-based medicine. These dynamics have since begun to redefine traditional practice and research regimens, impacting the comprehensive care that cancer patients can and should receive; and the enduring consequences for the delivery of healthcare. The impact of COVID-19 on oncology practice and trials might endure well beyond the short- to mid-term of the active pandemic. Therefore, these shifts must be accompanied by improved training and awareness, enhanced infrastructure, and evidence-based support to harness the positives and offset the potential negative consequences of the impacts of COVID-19 on cancer care. To address these paradoxical effects, we will conduct iterative, qualitative (face-to-face/video conference) interviews with neuro-oncology clinical and research professionals and adult brain tumor patients receiving care during the pandemic. We will capture unique aspects of oncology care: the lived, subjective, situated, and contingent accounts of patients and medical professionals, especially during a pandemic. We will also specifically compare the impact of telehealth during the pandemic on delivery of care to complex neuro-oncology patients. A summary of this in-depth, qualitative approach will result in a sophisticated understanding of neuro-oncology care on the frontline at a time of crisis, as experienced during a pandemic, to articulate best practices for future implementation.

Intracardiac Self Insertion of a Darning Needle in a Psychiatric Patient

2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (5) ◽  
pp. 01-13
Author(s):  
Avra Laarakker
Keyword(s):  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Psychiatric Patient ◽  
Surgical Intervention ◽  
Case Reports ◽  
Interventricular Septum ◽  
Intravenous Drug User ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Pubmed Search ◽  
Needle Entry ◽  
The Right

Objective: We report a case of self inserted needle into the left ventricle of the heart and a description of our surgical intervention in a psychiatric patient without decision-making capacity. We discuss issues regarding obtaining consent in this patient with a sub-acute presentation, report our operative approach, and summarize a treatment approach based on a review of current literature. Methods: A PubMed search using terms “needle, “heart”, “insertion”, “intracardiac foreign object”, yielded 69 relevant papers. 67 of these were case reports yielding 72 individual cases. Age, gender, cause of the needle entry (Accidental Plus (A+), Intravenous Drug User [IVDU], Self-inflicted (SI)), type of needle, location in heart, neuropsychiatric history, treatment, and outcome were documented. Results: Within the SI category, there were a total of 28 cases, 89.3% had a neuropsychiatric history whereas only there were only 2 such patients in both the IVDU and A+ group. The location of the needle in the heart in all 72 cases was as follows: right ventricle 40.3%, other 20.8%, left ventricle 19.4 %, ventricle and interventricular septum 16.7% and the right and left atrium were each 1.4 %. In all three groups (n=72), 77.8% of patients underwent surgery, with 92.9% having a stable outcome. Conclusion: Our case and review demonstrates that management of such cases, particularly when active mental health issues are present, requires a case-by-case evaluation and treatment as a specific standard of care has not been established. Surgical intervention appears to be the preferred management regardless of presentation with good outcomes. Running Title: Intracardiac Self Insertion of a Darning Needle in a Psychiatric Patient

Kidney Disease among People Who Are Incarcerated

2021 ◽  
pp. CJN.01910221
Author(s):  
Matthew Murphy ◽  
Ann Ding ◽  
Justin Berk ◽  
Josiah Rich ◽  
George Bayliss
Keyword(s):  
Criminal Justice ◽  
Kidney Disease ◽  
Criminal Justice System ◽  
Justice System ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Legal Obligation ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Racial And Ethnic Minorities ◽  
Community Standard

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects 15% of US adults and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. CKD disproportionately impacts certain populations, including racial and ethnic minorities and individuals from disadvantaged socioeconomic backgrounds. These groups are also disproportionately impacted by incarceration and barriers to accessing health services. Incarceration represents an opportunity to link marginalized individuals to CKD care. Despite a legal obligation to provide a community standard of care including the screening and treatment of individuals with CKD, there is little evidence to suggest systematic efforts are in place to address this prevalent, costly, and ultimately fatal condition. This review highlights unrealized opportunities to connect individuals with CKD to care within the criminal justice system and as they transition to the community, while underscoring the need for more evidence-based strategies to address the health impact of CKD on over-represented communities in the criminal justice system.

scholarly journals 101 Case report: to stent, or not to stent? The pale cast of evidence-based practice in acute stroke

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (e7) ◽  
pp. A33.1-A33
Author(s):  
Chris Blair ◽  
Kartik Bhatia ◽  
David Brunacci ◽  
John Worthington ◽  
Rebekah Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Evidence Based Practice ◽  
Blood Pressure Monitoring ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Limb Weakness ◽  
Vasopressor Support ◽  
Course Of Action ◽  
The Right

IntroductionWith approximately 200 procedures performed in the last year at our centre, worthwhile clinical lessons continue to emerge in the practice of endovascular clot retrieval (ECR) for acute stroke. This case demonstrates the value of considered clinical appraisal in a dynamic, information-rich setting. A 68 year-old man with established vertebrobasilar atherosclerotic disease developed capricious, blood pressure-sensitive neurological deficits after successful ECR for a basilar artery stroke, inviting the possibility of further intervention in the form of intracranial stenting. We avoided pursuing this course of action in favour of a more measured approach, entailing the provision of vasopressor support over the following week.MethodFollowing ECR, our patient was admitted to the intensive care unit for continuous blood pressure monitoring and close observation of his neurological deficits with serial NIHSS (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale) scoring. Systolic blood pressures were maintained between 140–160 mmHg using vasopressor support, with the aim of allowing time for recovery of vascular autoregulation and collateralization.ResultsOver six days, the patient developed moderate left upper and lower limb weakness. An MRI performed on Day 5 revealed limited interval infarction of the right hemipons and cerebellum, with complete re-occlusion of the mid-basilar arterial segment. He left the ICU with a NIHSS score of 7, and was living independently at 90-day follow-up (Modified Rankin Score 1).ConclusionThe ultimately favourable net outcome for our patient clearly illustrates the imperative to remain within the boundaries of evidence-based practice in this bold and rapidly evolving discipline.

Flag Verification on the High Seas: Understanding Requirements for Masters and Commanders

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 335-360 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angeline Lewis
Keyword(s):  
Law Enforcement ◽  
Reasonable Doubt ◽  
Law Of The Sea ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Objective Evidence ◽  
United Nations Convention ◽  
Enforcement Authority ◽  
The Right ◽  
Proper Balance ◽  
High Seas

Operational reporting from the Middle East indicates that the exercise by warships of a right of visit on the high seas, in order to verify the flag of the boarded vessel, is an important part of contemporary maritime enforcement operations. However, this reliance on ‘flag verification boardings,’ pursuant to Article 110 of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982, challenges the proper balance of law enforcement authority against the traditional freedom of navigation. It is therefore necessary to establish clearly for both civilian masters and warship commanders where the evidentiary threshold for reasonable doubt as to the nationality of vessels lies, so as to justify non-consensual visit and search by a foreign warship. This article makes an objective, evidence-based assessment of the threshold, concluding with a caution against over-stretching the right of visit to accommodate law enforcement purposes not envisaged in the drafting of Article 110.

scholarly journals Giant unicystic ameloblastoma of maxilla-successful endoscopic management

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 1696
Author(s):  
Sanjeev Mohanty ◽  
Manu Vergis ◽  
Devipriya V. ◽  
Haripriya G. ◽  
Lakshmi Shree Nallapaneni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Resolution ◽  
Organ Preservation ◽  
Mouth Opening ◽  
Facial Asymmetry ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Endoscopic Management ◽  
Rare Tumour ◽  
Unicystic Ameloblastoma ◽  
The Right

<p>This 32-year-old male patient presented with complaints of restricted mouth opening and gross facial asymmetry owing to the massive jaw swelling on the right side. After a thorough examination, a diagnosis of unicystic ameloblastoma of maxilla. Although, the standard of care surgical approach was through Weber-Fergusson incision, a concerted attempt to excise the tumour with the minimally invasive endoscopic route was made successfully. The patient was symptom free now with complete resolution of swelling on a regular follow up post operatively. This case report highlighted the modern day protocol of organ preservation concepts in surgical management of a rare tumour in otolaryngology practice</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document