ASO Author Reflections: Primary Tumor Location and Long-Term Survival After Hepatic Resection for Metastatic Colon Cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (S3) ◽  
pp. 747-748 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Creasy ◽  
Michael I. D’Angelica
2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-438 ◽  
Author(s):  
John M. Creasy ◽  
Eran Sadot ◽  
Bas Groot Koerkamp ◽  
Joanne F. Chou ◽  
Mithat Gonen ◽  
...  

Medicine ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 98 (5) ◽  
pp. e14326 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin Liu ◽  
Yao Wang ◽  
Haiping Jiang ◽  
Xiongfei Yu ◽  
Nong Xu

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 455-455
Author(s):  
Nader Hanna ◽  
Ebere Onukwugha ◽  
Kaloyan A Bikov ◽  
Zhiyuan Zheng ◽  
Brian S. Seal ◽  
...  

455 Background: Metastatic colon cancer (mCC) patients often receive multiple lines of chemotherapy as treatment (TX) to improve survival or quality of life, yet the “real world” benefits and risks of multiple TX lines have not been fully examined. Methods: Elderly (65+) SEER-Medicare patients diagnosed with mCC in 2003-2007 were followed until death or 12/31/09 to examine the survival benefits for different chemotherapy lines. The median time between diagnosis date and the starting date of 2nd line was 352 days. Therefore, we restricted comparative analysis of 2nd and subsequent chemotherapy TX lines to patients who survived at least 1 year after mCC diagnosis date. We used Cox regression framework and adjusted for patients’ TX and censoring histories by using inverse probability weighting method. Separate analyses were conducted for short (2 years) and long-term (5 years) survival to examine different benefits of 2nd and subsequent chemotherapy lines. Results: Of 2,600 elderly Medicare mCC patients diagnosed between 2003-2007 and who survived at least 1 year, 2,530 were dead by the end of 2009. Significant factors associated with long-term survival were 1st line therapy(HR = 0.76; p < 0.01), 2nd line therapy (HR = 0.83; p < 0.01) , and subsequent chemotherapy line therapy(HR = 0.85; p = 0.04), as compared to no therapy, age groups 95+ (HR = 3.07; p < 0.01), 85-94 (HR = 1.33; p < 0.01), and 75-84 (HR = 1.10; p = 0.04) as compared to 65+-74, Asian vs. White (HR = 0.71; p < 0.01), and zip code level household median income (HR = 0.98; p = 0.01). For short-term survival, the benefits of 2nd and subsequent chemotherapy lines were maintained until month 29. Patients with poor performance status were less likely to proceed to 2nd line therapy. No statistically significant variables predicting receipt of subsequent chemotherapy lines were identified. Conclusions: Among elderly Medicare mCC patients who survived at least 1 year after diagnosis, 1st line therapy improved both short and long-term survival. 2nd and subsequent chemotherapy line therapy reduced short-term mortality (2 years); however, they didn’t add any additional long term survival benefit (5 years) as compared to 1st line therapy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 709-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. G. J. Leijssen ◽  
A. M. Dinaux ◽  
H. Kunitake ◽  
L. G. Bordeianou ◽  
D. L. Berger

Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arvid Pourlotfi ◽  
Rebecka Ahl Hulme ◽  
Maximilian Peter Forssten ◽  
Gabriel Sjolin ◽  
Gary A. Bass ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 93-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcella Arru ◽  
Luca Aldrighetti ◽  
Renato Castoldi ◽  
Saverio Di Palo ◽  
Elena Orsenigo ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Øystein Høydahl ◽  
Tom-Harald Edna ◽  
Athanasios Xanthoulis ◽  
Stian Lydersen ◽  
Birger Henning Endreseth

Abstract Background Few studies have addressed colon cancer surgery outcomes in an unselected cohort of octogenarian patients. The present study aimed to evaluate the relative survival of octogenarian patients after a major resection of colon cancer with a curative intent. Methods All patients diagnosed with colon cancer at Levanger Hospital between 1980 and 2016 were included. We performed logistic regression to test for associations between 100-day mortality and explanatory variables. We performed a relative survival analysis to identify factors associated with short- and long-term survival.Results Among 239 octogenarian patients treated with major resections with curative intent, the 100-day mortality was 10.1%. Among 215 patients that survived the first 100 days, the five-year relative survival rate was 99.7%. The 100-day mortality of octogenarian patients was significantly shorter than that of younger patients, but the long-term survival converged with that of younger patients. Among octogenarian patients, the incidence of colon cancer more than doubled during our 37-year observation period. The relative increase in patients undergoing surgery exceeded the increase in incidence; hence, more patients were selected for surgery over time. A high 100-day mortality was associated with older age, a high American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, and emergency surgery. Moreover, worse long-term survival was associated with a high Charlson Comorbidity Index, a high ASA score, a worse TNM stage, emergency surgery and residual tumours. Both the 100‑day and long-term survival rates improved over time. Conclusion Among octogenarian patients with colon cancer that underwent major resections with curative intent, the 100-day mortality was high, but after surviving 100 days, the relative long-term survival rate was comparable to that of younger patients. Further improvements in survival will primarily require measures to reduce the 100-day mortality risk.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document