scholarly journals Tracing the Impact of Bank Liquidity Shocks: Evidence from an Emerging Market

2008 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 1413-1442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Asim Ijaz Khwaja ◽  
Atif Mian
Keyword(s):  
Financial Distress ◽  
Small Firms ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Credit Market ◽  
Large Firms ◽  
Liquidity Shocks ◽  
Political Ties ◽  
Nuclear Tests ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Do So

We examine the impact of liquidity shocks by exploiting cross-bank liquidity variation induced by unanticipated nuclear tests in Pakistan. We show that for the same firm borrowing from two different banks, its loan from the bank experiencing a 1 percent larger decline in liquidity drops by an additional 0.6 percent. While banks pass their liquidity shocks on to firms, large firms—particularly those with strong business or political ties—completely compensate this loss by additional borrowing through the credit market. Small firms are unable to do so and face large drops in overall borrowing and increased financial distress. (JEL E44, G21, G32, L25)

Industrial Research and Firm Size, Survival, and Growth in American Manufacturing, 1921–1946: An Assessment

1983 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 953-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
David C. Mowery
Keyword(s):  
Firm Size ◽  
Small Firms ◽  
Firm Growth ◽  
Industrial Research ◽  
Large Firms ◽  
Research Activity ◽  
Growth And Survival ◽  
Survival And Growth ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

The literature on the development of American industrial research suggests that during the twentieth century large firms “dominated” industrial research, and reaped the majority of the benefits from such activity. This paper utilizes new data to analyze both the relationship between firm size and research employment and the impact of research activity on firm growth and survival during 1921–1946. The results suggest that large firms were no more research-intensive than were small firms during the 1921–1946 period. Research activity significantly enhanced the probability of firms' survival among the ranks of the 200 largest manufacturing firms during 1921–1946. Research employment also improved the growth performance of both large and small firms during 1933–1946.

A Perceptual Measure of Innovation Performance: Firm-Level Evidence from Turkey

2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (06) ◽  
pp. 1750038 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derya Findik ◽  
Berna Beyhan
Keyword(s):  
Factor Analysis ◽  
Small Firms ◽  
Innovation Performance ◽  
Large Firms ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Process Innovations ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Process Oriented ◽  
Product And Process ◽  
The Impact

This paper aims to introduce a qualitative indicator to measure innovation performance of Turkish firms by using firm-level data collected by Turkish Statistical Institute (TURKSTAT) in 2008 and 2009. We propose a new indicator to measure the innovation performance which is simply based on the perception of firms regarding to the impacts of innovation. In order to create performance indicators, we conduct a factor analysis to group the firms’ perceptions on the impacts of innovation. Factor analysis gives us product and process-oriented impacts of innovation. There are significant differences among product innovators, process innovators and firms engaged in both product and process innovations with respect to their perceptions on product and process-oriented impacts of innovation. Among these three groups, product- and process-oriented impacts provide a highest value for the firms that perform both product and process innovations. As far as the link between firm characteristics and the impact of innovation is considered, there is a significant difference between small and large firms with respect to their perceptions on product-oriented impact of innovation. While product-oriented impact is larger for small firms, large firms focus more on process-oriented impact. Anova results also indicate that perceptions on process-oriented impact significantly differ among exporter firms, domestic market-oriented firms and firms being active in internal and external markets. Process-oriented impact generates results in favor of exporting firms.

Market power and R&D investment: the case of China

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaohua Sun ◽  
Fang Yuan ◽  
Yun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Market Power ◽  
Small Firms ◽  
Market Competition ◽  
Industry Concentration ◽  
Alternative View ◽  
Large Firms ◽  
Industry Level ◽  
Depth Analysis ◽  
The Impact ◽  
D Investment

Abstract This article presents an in-depth analysis of market power and its impact on firm research and development (R&D) investment in China. Two opposing theories have been proposed in the literature. The first, due to Schumpeter, suggests that monopoly power has a positive effect on firms’ propensity to innovate hence their investment in R&D. The alternative view, first proposed by Arrow, suggests that firms invest in R&D in order to escape competition, and thus market competition stimulates innovation. In testing these theories, prior studies have measured market power in different ways. Some use the so-called Lerner index, which measures the profit margin of a particular firm. Others use measures of industry concentration, for example, the Herfindahl index. This article tests the competing theories using a sample of 300,095 Chinese manufacturing firms in 29 two-digit manufacturing industries. We unify the two measures of market power, using a hierarchical linear model, to determine whether industry-level measures add power to specifications based on firm-level markups alone. We find, first, that firms are less likely to carry out R&D activities as their market power intensifies. The effect is nonlinear: firms with higher markups spend even less on R&D than a linear specification predicts. This finding supports Arrow’s theory and contradicts Schumpeter’s theory. Second, for the sample as a whole, the impact of industry-level concentration is negligible. However, when we break the sample into large, medium, and small firms, industry concentration has a significant effect on large and medium-sized firms but no impact on small firms. Thus, large firms with high markups in concentrated industries spend less on R&D than large firms with high markups in less concentrated industries. We interpret this as further evidence in support of the escape competition theory: less concentrated industries are more competitive, forcing the leaders to invest more heavily on R&D.

Firm innovation and access to finance: firm-level evidence from India

2021 ◽  
Vol ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print) ◽  
Author(s):  
Parneet Kaur ◽  
Navneet Kaur ◽  
Paras Kanojia
Keyword(s):  
Small Firms ◽  
Small And Medium Enterprises ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Innovation Performance ◽  
Innovation Activity ◽  
Firm Level ◽  
Firm Innovation ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Explanatory Variables ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Based on 9,281 firm-level survey data on micro, small and medium enterprises (MSMEs) in India, this study aims to investigate how access to different finance sources and collateral requirement facilitates the firm’s innovation activity across industries. Design/methodology/approach This paper used ordered logit regression models using Stata software for explanatory variables to measure the impact of explanatory variables on firm innovation performance. Firms’ innovation performance is measured through the aggregate innovation index obtained by adding up the no. of “new-to-firm” activities. Findings The empirical results reveal that external sources of funding impact innovation activity than other financing sources. Also, the requirement of collateral for financing impacts innovation performance significantly. This paper finds that firms funded by state-owned banks or government agency are more actively engaged in innovation activities. The firm’s size, ownership structure and location of the firm also show the varying innovation performance. This paper found variation in innovation performance across industries as well. Practical implications First, the present study underlines the significance of funding sources. Second, minimizing the need for collateral to obtain external finance boosts small firms’ innovation activity and will also trigger overall economic growth. Finally, while making policies for ownership transformation of state-owned institutions, policymakers should discuss these policies’ impact on innovative firms. Originality/value What facilitates innovation performance in an emerging market is missing in the literature for MSMEs, largely due to lack of data. It is reasonable not to generalize innovation knowledge in large firms to small firms because of the constraints, particularly MSMEs face.

scholarly journals Determinants of foreign exchange risk management in Latin American firms

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 502-524
Author(s):  
César Augusto Giraldo-Prieto ◽  
Cristina De Fuentes ◽  
Francisco Sogorb-Mira
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Exchange ◽  
Latin American ◽  
Financial Distress ◽  
Small Firms ◽  
Raw Materials ◽  
Foreign Exchange Risk ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Listed Firms ◽  
Exchange Risk ◽  
The Impact

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to identify whether Latin American (LA) firms are adopting any hedging strategy when designing foreign exchange risk (FXR) measures. To that end, the authors explore the impact of several drivers of FXR management. Design/methodology/approach The sample consists of 342 non-financial listed firms established in a group of representative countries of the LA region and covers the period from 2008 to 2016. Hypothesis testing is performed through a Logit model that measures the likelihood to adopt hedging practices. In addition, a Tobit test offers further insights into the derivatives users. Findings The authors corroborate capital structure-related hypotheses such as tax goals, financial distress, liquidity and growth opportunities. In addition, both ownership concentration and income tax payable seem to be negative and significant determinants of FXR coverage. Originality/value Results reported in this study are relevant for the LA region with high tradition in raw materials and commodities exports. The results show that LA firms still make limited use of derivatives and there is still much room for improvement. Hence, additional efforts to promote FXR hedging should be desirable, to meet authorities’ recommendations (OECD et al., 2007). Further research exploring corporate governance relationships and differences between large and small firms might be helpful.

scholarly journals Basel III LCR Requirement and Banks’ Deposit Funding: Empirical Evidence from Emerging Markets

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-128
Author(s):  
Tafirei Mashamba ◽  
Rabson Magweva
Keyword(s):  
Emerging Markets ◽  
Banking Sector ◽  
Global Financial Crisis ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Basel Iii ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Liquidity Shocks ◽  
Coverage Ratio ◽  
Banking Institutions ◽  
The Impact

Abstract In December 2010, the Basel Committee on Baking Supervision introduced the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) standard for banking institutions in response to disturbances that rocked banks during the 2007/08 global financial crisis. The rule is aimed at enhancing banks’ resilience to short term liquidity shocks as it requires banks to hold ample stock of high grade securities. This study attempts to evaluate the impact of the LCR specification on the funding structures of banks in emerging markets by answering the question “Did Basel III LCR requirement induced banks in emerging market economies to increase deposit funding more than they would otherwise do?” The study found that the LCR charge has been effective in persuading banks in emerging markets to garner more stable retail deposits. This response may engender banking sector stability if competition for retail deposits is properly regulated.

scholarly journals An Examination Of The Economic Impact Of Pension Rate Reductions On Future Pension Expense, Earnings, And Cash Flows: A Simulation

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan I. Blankley ◽  
Philip G. Cottell ◽  
Richard H. McClure
Keyword(s):  
Small Firms ◽  
Pension Plan ◽  
Cash Flows ◽  
Pension Plans ◽  
Large Firms ◽  
Asset Return ◽  
Future Earnings ◽  
Economic Climate ◽  
The Future ◽  
The Impact

In this paper, we develop a two-period analytical model of pension cost, which allows us to simulate pension expense and the associated earnings impact. These estimates are important because they provide information to the market, and because they are useful in estimating future cash flows or for other analytical purposes. This is especially true now, because the economic environment has deteriorated to a point that many investors perceive increased uncertainty with respect to pension plans and the effect they have on future income. Some plan sponsors have not been faced with pension plan losses for over a decade or longer, having enjoyed reduced or eliminated funding holidays as a result of high returns to pension plan assets. Given the current economic climate, however, these results (boosts to earnings due to pension credits and reduced or eliminated funding requirements) may change abruptly. In fact, several authors in the popular financial press have speculated on the impact of such fundamental changes in pension assets, liabilities and estimates. We simulate the potential results for two periods in the future based upon percentiles drawn from a sample of 1,116 firms taken from Compustat. We compute projected pension expense for the 25th percentile firm, the median firm, and the 75th percentile firm by varying the discount rates, expected rates of return, and actual asset return assumptions. Our results indicate that while the pension expense effect is large in both periods across small, mid-sized and large firms, large firms show the greatest increase in pension expense. Interestingly, however, the earnings impact is the smallest for large firms in both periods, and is not material in period one for both large and mid-sized firms. It is material for small firms. Firms with small pension plans appear to have the greatest earnings drag both one and two years into the future. In period two, all firms face significantly greater expense and earnings reductions, although again, smaller firms face the greatest impact. In addition, all firms face significantly increased cash funding requirements in order to prevent funding ratios (plan assets scaled by pension liabilities) from deteriorating. These results suggest not only future earnings reductions form pension rate changes, but also a potential cash flow impact as well.

Internationalization and performance: evidence from Chinese firms

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Zhou
Keyword(s):  
Firm Size ◽  
Small Firms ◽  
Manufacturing Firms ◽  
Research Database ◽  
Large Firms ◽  
Chinese Firms ◽  
Content Type ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Overseas Subsidiaries ◽  
A Share

Purpose This paper aims to test the internationalization–performance relationship based on data of Chinese firms and the impact of firm size on the internationalization–performance relationship. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses overseas subsidiaries as a percentage of total subsidiaries to measure the degree of internationalization. As the overseas subsidiaries and total subsidiaries data of Chinese A-share listed firms are not available in any existing databases, the author hand-collected information on subsidiaries of Chinese A-share listed manufacturing firms from their annual financial reports during 2001-2014. The basic accounting and market information is collected from the China Stock Market and Accounting Research Database. This paper finally gets 535 manufacturing firms. Findings The empirical results suggest that the internationalization–performance relationship is W-shaped in overall samples, but varies with firm size. Specifically, the internationalization–performance relationship is W-shaped in small firms and U-shaped in large firms. Research limitations/implications Future studies based on unlisted Chinese firms or other measurement of internationalization may provide further understanding of the internationalization–performance relationship. Practical implications Policymakers should help small firms prepare a long-term internationalization strategy, giving more support for small firms in the first and third phases of internationalization and helping them to reach the second and fourth phases. Policymakers should also pay more attention to limit the aggressive internationalization behavior of large firms. Originality/value This study provides new evidence for the internationalization–performance relationship by using the unique longitude sample from China and the unique measurement of internationalization. We also highlight the importance of firm characteristics in the examination of internationalization–performance relationship, which provides a potential explanation for previous mixed evidence.

M&A Activity, Financial Distress, and Trade Credit

2016 ◽  
pp. 51-72
Author(s):  
Mine Uğurlu
Keyword(s):  
Financial Distress ◽  
Small Firms ◽  
Trade Credit ◽  
Emerging Market ◽  
Financing Constraints ◽  
Capital Investments ◽  
High Likelihood ◽  
Positive Relation ◽  
Pecking Order ◽  
Distressed Firms

This paper investigates the effects of firm constraints on the likelihood of M&A involvement and explores if mergers mitigate financing constraints. The results display that young and small firms facing financial constraints, corporations that have low R&D expenditures and capital investments have higher likelihood of M&A activity. Firms that compete in technology-driven industries are more likely to merge. Equity- constrained firms have high likelihood of M&A involvement while cash insolvency and leverage are not significantly related with mergers. The results support the positive relation between the use of trade credit and financial distress displayed in previous studies, but reveal that distressed firms involved in mergers reduce trade credit significantly. Results indicate that mergers mitigate the positive relation between distress and trade credit. Distressed firms involved in mergers avoid payables which rank lower in pecking order finance. M&As seem to alleviate financing constraints for cash-constrained corporations in an emerging market.

The impact of employee involvement on small firms' financial performance

1999 ◽  
Vol 169 ◽  
pp. 78-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex Bryson
Keyword(s):  
Financial Performance ◽  
Small Firms ◽  
Large Firm ◽  
Employee Involvement ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Level Data ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship ◽  
Do So

The author examines the relationship between employee involvement (EI) and small firms‘ financial performance using statistical analyses of establishment-level data from the 1990 Workplace Industrial Relations Survey. The author finds EI practices and EI combinations which ‘work’ for small-firm establishments are very different from those that work for large-firm establishments. The least bureaucratic and least costly EI methods have the potential to benefit small firms most. Whether they actually do so depends on the array of other EI and non-EI practices in operation: an inappropriate configuration can have a negative effect on performance. The findings take account of factors associated with being an ‘EI firm’.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document