Peptic ulcer perforation: Management of high-risk cases by percutaneous abdominal drainage

2005 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 30-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Mizanur Rahman ◽  
A Al Mamun ◽  
M Delwar Hossain ◽  
M Kante Das
2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Inge Kurniawati ◽  
I Ketut Wiargitha ◽  
Tjokorda Gde Bagus Mahadewa ◽  
Bianca Jeanne

Background: Perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) is one of the most common non-traumatic emergency cases in the emergency unit, and have a high mortality rate, more than 70% in the elderly. Accurate and early identification of high-risk surgical patients with PPU is important for triage and risk stratification. The objective of this study was to evaluate the mortality in patients with operated PPU.Methods: Between January 2015 to December 2016, 50 consecutive patients with PPU who performed laparotomy were studied retrospectively. This study was a diagnostic test to evaluate the validity of PULP (Peptic Ulcer Perforation) score to predict mortality in patient with operated PPU and determine the best cut-off point. Presentation ≥ or < 24 hours, age of 65 years old, the presence of preoperative shock, ASA score, the presence of AIDS or active malignancy, liver failure, concomitant use of steroids and serum creatinine > 14.7 g/dL were evaluated in PULP score.Results: The cut-off point for PULP the score in the present study is > 7, based on the optimal cut-off value, patients could be divided into low-risk patients (a score of < 7 points), and high-risk patients (a score of > 7 points). PULP score had 91.7% sensitivity, 65.4% specificity, and 78% accuracy in this study. Positive predictive value and negative predictive the values were 71% and 89.9%.Conclusion: The PULP score is sensitive to predict the mortality risk in patients operated for perforated peptic ulcer and can assist in risk stratification and triage.  


Resuscitation ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 82 ◽  
pp. S31
Author(s):  
David Levarett Buck ◽  
Morten Vester-Andersen ◽  
Morten Hylander Møller

1996 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
pp. 1363-1371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilie Svanes ◽  
Rolv T. Lie ◽  
Stein A. Lie ◽  
Gunnar Kvåle ◽  
Knut Svanes ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Neelkamal Gupta ◽  
Mangtani Jitendra K ◽  
Khandelwal Dheeraj K

INTRODUCTION:Apeptic ulcer is a defect in the upper gastrointestinal mucosa that extends through the muscularis mucosa into deeper layers of the gut wall. Non-steroidal anti-inammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the major risk factors for peptic ulcer disease.Long-term use of NSAIDs, however, can cause gastrointestinal (GI) ulcers and potentially life-threatening ulcer complications. MATERIALAND METHOD: The present study was conducted on 100 patients of peptic ulcer of either sex in Department of Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, Jaipur. History of any other co morbid illness and any drug being taken with its time duration were recorded in detail. RESULT AND DISCUSSION: From this study, it was observed that among the 69 patients of duodenal perforation, 73.91% were taking NSAID. Similarly among the 31 patients of gastric perforation 80.64% were taking NSAID. Overall total 76% patients were taking these drugs. CONCLUSION: It is concluded from this study that a strong statistical correlation was found between use of NSAIDs and peptic ulcer perforation.


1981 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 448
Author(s):  
T H Kim ◽  
S W Kim ◽  
J S Lim ◽  
Y J Kim

1998 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 241-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cecilie Svanes ◽  
Robert B. Sothern ◽  
Halfdan Sørbye

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-9
Author(s):  
B Islam ◽  
A Sayed ◽  
I Ahmed ◽  
MA Hannan ◽  
MA Alam

Background: Peptic ulcer perforation is a common surgical problem in Bangladesh. For Muslims, the whole of the Ramadan is a time of strictly fasting during day time. Globally near one billion Muslims fast during this month. So it is an opportunity to evaluate the relationship between Ramadan fasting and peptic ulcer perforation. Present study was designed to evaluate the effect of fasting, socioeconomic condition, smoking and inadequate treatment of PUD on peptic ulcer perforation.TAJ 2014; 27(1): 4-9


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document