Topical treatment of venereal warts: a comparative open study of podophyllotoxin cream versus solution

1996 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 429-434 ◽  
Author(s):  
Urban Claesson ◽  
Allan Lassus ◽  
Hanno Happonen ◽  
Lars Hogstrom ◽  
Antoine Siboulet

Podophyllotoxin solution 0.5 is licensed for use in the treatment of condylomata acuminata genital warts in men in a number of European countries. In some countries, approval also extends to treatment of genital warts in women. This controlled randomized prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a cream formulation of podophyllotoxin at 2 concentrations 0.15 and 0.3 , using 0.5 podophyllotoxin solution as a reference treatment. Two separate studies were initiated, to assess the 3 treatment groups in a male patients, and b female patients. Statistical evaluation was based on a 'response rate' calculated at each clinic visit. The mean 'response rates' in the male patient study at 4 weeks were 75.1 , 79.0 and 85.6 in the 0.15 cream, 0.3 cream and 0.5 solution groups, respectively. The corresponding 'response rates' for the female patient study were 86.2 , 92.6 , and 93.1 , respectively. The relapse rates for both male and female patients were 6.0 in the 0.15 cream group, 8.6 in the 0.3 cream group and 8.6 in the 0.5 solution group. The results show that there were no statistically significant differences between the 3 treatments with regard to both efficacy and safety. This was true for both the male and female patient groups.

Author(s):  
Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma ◽  
Corinne Miceli-Richard ◽  
Juergen Braun ◽  
Helena Marzo-Ortega ◽  
Karel Pavelka ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 182-188
Author(s):  
Vera N. Prilepskaya ◽  
Mikhail Gomberg ◽  
Smita Kothari ◽  
Karen Yee ◽  
Amit Kulkarni ◽  
...  

Background: Human papillomavirus (HPV) infections are the etiologic agents of genital warts (GW). HPV is one of the most frequent sexually transmitted viral infections, and nearly 65% of individuals with partners who have GW also develop GW. In Russia, as in many other countries, overall GW prevalence data are scarce. Given the lack of Russian data, our study estimated GW prevalence in physician practices and GW-related health care resource use in Russia among male and female patients aged 18–60 years. Methods: Russian physicians recorded daily patient logs for a two-week period and conducted a 30-minute survey to estimate GW prevalence and related resource use between January and June 2012. Age, gender, and GW diagnosis status was recorded. Prevalence was obtained for each physician and calculated into a single estimate across all physician types. Overall prevalence estimate and 95% confidence interval were weighted by the estimated number of physicians in each specialty and the proportion of total patients visiting each specialist type. Health care resource use was reported and compared among different physician specialties. Results: The overall GW prevalence estimate was 9162 cases per 100 000 for male and female patients aged 18–60 years, with 9917 for obstetrician/gynecologists (OB/GYN), 8298 for urologists (URO), and 7833 for dermatologists (DERM). For males, GW prevalence was 8769 cases per 100 000, with the highest prevalence in the 30–34 age group. In females, GW prevalence was 9304 cases per 100 000, with the highest prevalence in the 18–24 age group. Among overall existing GW cases, 63.1% were recurrent and 34.2% were resistant. For all patients in our study, GW prevalence was higher in females. Male patients had the highest prevalence for those aged 30–34 years, and female patients for those aged 18–24 years. These results are consistent with data reported in other countries. Study limitations include estimates and results representative of the urban population of Russia. Despite its limitations, this study provides a GW prevalence estimate in Russia not previously available. Conclusions: GW is a significant public health concern in Russia, and the GW prevalence was higher in female patients compared to male patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 121-126
Author(s):  
V. G. Galonsky ◽  
N. V. Tarasova ◽  
V. V. Aliamovskii ◽  
I. S. Leonovich

Relevance. Separate issues in anthropomorphic sizes of relative norm of the ideal smile, its qualitative and qualitative parameters have not been addressed to sufficiently and are not properly reflected in scientific literature.Purpose. To determine distinguishing features in average smile parameters of the smile in male and female patients with orthognathic occlusion.Materials and methods. A clinical and anthropometric evaluation of parameters in main smile types was carried out for 150 young males and 150 young females aged 19-24 who had identical physiological development parameters.Results. It has been revealed that occurrence frequency of main smile types in patients with orthognathic occlusion has pronounced signs of sexual dimorphism which in over one half of the cases lies in predominance of the incisal smile type in males (52.7%) and the fascial type in females (55.3%). Occurence frequency of the cervical smile type totaled 25% among the studied patients of both genders. Average vertical size parameters in the incisal smile lies within the diapason of 3.91-4.91mm with surpassing by 1mm in males. Analogical data for the fascial smile type form the diapason of 6.21-6.73mm with surpassing by 0.52mm in females. The cervical smile type is characterised by larger vertical size forming the diapason of 7.94-8.91mm with surpassing by 0.97mm in males.Conclusion. The results of the study have shown that the “beautiful and ideal smile” is a relative concept having varied anthropometric characteristics and pronounced signs of sexual dimorphism lying in a broad spectrum of the dentofacial system norm notion with specific vectors for individual morphological deviations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document