Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography in the assessment of stenotic aortic valve area: a comparative study

2012 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 995-1003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praxitelis Dimitriou ◽  
Anders Kähäri ◽  
Kent Emilsson ◽  
Per Thunberg
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Transthoracic Echocardiography ◽  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Valve Area

Assessment of aortic valve area in aortic stenosis by magnetic resonance imaging

1992 ◽  
Vol 70 (9) ◽  
pp. 952-955 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markku Kupari ◽  
Pauli Hekali ◽  
Pekka Keto ◽  
Veli-Pekka Poutanen ◽  
Leena Porkka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Aortic Valve ◽  
Aortic Stenosis ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Valve Area

scholarly journals Aortic stenosis reexpanded – a novel approach to determine aortic valve area with phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging

2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Troger ◽  
I Lechner ◽  
M Reindl ◽  
C Tiller ◽  
M Holzknecht ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Phase Contrast ◽  
Aortic Valve Area ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Novel Approach ◽  
Cine Cmr ◽  
Valve Area

Abstract Background Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) has become the diagnostic standard for evaluating aortic stenosis (AS) severity, mainly because of its advantages in comparison to the gold standard of cardiac catheterization. However, its inaccuracies in determining stroke volume (SV) and consequentially computing aortic valve area (AVA) call for a more precise and dependable method. Phase contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (PC-CMR) is an aspiring tool to push these boundaries. Purpose The aim of this study was to validate a novel and simple approach based on PC-CMR against the invasive and echocardiographic determination of SV and AVA in patients with moderate and severe AS. Methods A total of 50 patients with moderate or severe AS underwent TTE, cardiac catheterization and CMR; AVA by PC-CMR was determined via plotting momentary flow across the valve against momentary flow velocity. SV via CMR was measured directly via PC-CMR and volumetrically using cine images. Invasive SV and AVA were determined via Fick principle and Gorlin formula, respectively. TTE yielded SV and AVA using the continuity equation. Finally, gradients were calculated via the modified Bernoulli equation. Results SV by PC-CMR showed a strong correlation with cine-CMR with no significant bias (r: 0.730, p<0.001; SV by PC-CMR: 85±31ml; SV by cine-CMR: 85±19ml, p=0.829). Peak gradients determined by PC-CMR were 65±29mmHg and correlated inversely with AVA by PC-CMR (r: −0.371; p=0.008). Mean AVA during the whole systolic phase showed a moderate correlation (r: 0.544, p<0.001) to invasive AVA with a small bias (AVA by CMR: 0.78±0.25cm2 versus invasive AVA: 0.70±0.23cm2, bias: 0.08cm2, p=0.017). Inter-methodical correlation and bias of AVA as measured by TTE and invasive AVA (AVA by TTE: 0.81±0.23cm2, r: 0.580, p<0.001, bias 0.11cm2, p<0.001) were similar to AVA by PC-CMR and invasive AVA. Conclusion PC-CMR provides a great option to yield reliable and solid SV values in patients with moderate and severe AS. Furthermore, continuous determination of flow volumes and flow velocities is able to determine AVA in these patients in an easy and reproducible manner. Our novel approach shines a light on the diagnostic potential of PC-CMR for non-invasive AS grading, especially in cases where echocardiography reaches its limits and where clinical findings appear inconclusive. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Central Illustration Cine (l,r) and PC-CMR (m) images in AS

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document