scholarly journals Fixation tack penetration into the maxillary sinus: A case report of a guided bone regeneration procedure complication

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 43-47 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Harrison ◽  
Irma Iskandar ◽  
Hua-Hong Chien
Author(s):  
Nina Rouzmeh ◽  
Amirali Reza Rasouli Ghahroudi ◽  
Shadi Akhbarifar ◽  
Faezeh Atri

Aesthetic implant treatment in the maxillary anterior area can be challenging, especially in case of insufficient bone volume. In this clinical report, a guided bone regeneration procedure using the combination of xenograft and allograft with non-resorbable membrane was applied in the atrophic edentulous alveolar crest to reconstruct a proper implant bed. Moreover, Prosthetic tissue molding was performed to improve success and optimize aesthetics. This article provides information rele- vant to treatment plans, surgical procedures, and prosthetic management in aesthetically important areas.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikolaos Soldatos ◽  
Georgios E. Romanos ◽  
Michelle Michaiel ◽  
Ali Sajadi ◽  
Nikola Angelov ◽  
...  

Background. The placement of an implant in a previously infected site is an important etiologic factor contributing to implant failure. The aim of this case report is to present the management of retrograde peri-implantitis (RPI) in a first maxillary molar site, 2 years after the implant placement. The RPI was treated using an air-abrasive device, Er,Cr:YSGG laser, and guided bone regeneration (GBR). Case Description. A 65-year-old Caucasian male presented with a draining fistula associated with an implant at tooth #3. Tooth #3 revealed periapical radiolucency two years before the implant placement. Tooth #3 was extracted, and a ridge preservation procedure was performed followed by implant rehabilitation. A periapical radiograph (PA) showed lack of bone density around the implant apex. The site was decontaminated with an air-abrasive device and Er,Cr:YSGG laser, and GBR was performed. The patient was seen every two weeks until suture removal, followed by monthly visits for 12 months. The periapical X-rays, from 6 to 13 months postoperatively, showed increased bone density around the implant apex, with no signs of residual clinical or radiographic pathology and probing depths ≤4 mm. Conclusions. The etiology of RPI in this case was the placement of an implant in a previously infected site. The use of an air-abrasive device, Er,Cr:YSGG, and GBR was utilized to treat this case of RPI. The site was monitored for 13 months, and increased radiographic bone density was noted.


Materials ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 2166
Author(s):  
Jeong-Kui Ku ◽  
In-Woong Um ◽  
Mi-Kyoung Jun ◽  
Il-hyung Kim

An autogenous, demineralized, dentin matrix is a well-known osteo-inductive bone substitute that is mostly composed of type I collagen and is widely used in implant dentistry. This single case report describes a successful outcome in guided bone regeneration and dental implantation with a novel human-derived collagen membrane. The authors fabricated a dentin-derived-barrier membrane from a block-type autogenous demineralized dentin matrix to overcome the mechanical instability of the collagen membrane. The dentin-derived-barrier acted as an osteo-inductive collagen membrane with mechanical and clot stabilities, and it replaced the osteo-genetic function of the periosteum. Further research involving large numbers of patients should be conducted to evaluate bone forming capacity in comparison with other collagen membranes.


Author(s):  
A. A. Kulakov ◽  
V. A. Badalyan ◽  
Tursunbay K. Khamraev ◽  
A. S. Kasparov ◽  
V. A. Brutyan

The aim of this study was to review the possibilities of using the various types of membranes currently available and used in the guided bone regeneration procedure. Literary sources were analyzed, including English-language articles from the pubmed and elibrary information portals. For horizontal defects, it is most preferable to use resorbable membranes with various modifications of surgical techniques, while for vertical defects, the use of wire-frame non-reabsorbable membranes is most acceptable.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 97
Author(s):  
GulnarDara Sethna ◽  
RajeshPrabhakar Gaikwad ◽  
Rajat Nahar ◽  
SatishSudhakar Gadai ◽  
NoopurSubhash Narayane

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document