scholarly journals Medical management of acute type a aortic dissection in association with early open repair of acute limb ischemia may prevent aortic surgery

2013 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 52-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michalis N. Gionis ◽  
George Kaimasidis ◽  
Emmanouel Tavlas ◽  
Nikolaos Kontopodis ◽  
Marina Plataki ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 405-409
Author(s):  
Kiyotaka Suzuki ◽  
Keiji Uchida ◽  
Tomoyuki Minami ◽  
Tomoki Cho ◽  
Yusuke Matsuki ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kentaro Tamura ◽  
Kousuke Nakajim ◽  
Genta Chikazawa ◽  
Arudo Hiraoka ◽  
Toshinori Totsugawa ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 153857442110171
Author(s):  
Mona Jaffar-Karballai ◽  
Tien Thuy Tran ◽  
Oyinkan Oremakinde ◽  
Somama Zafar ◽  
Amer Harky

Over the decades, it has been well established that malperfusion complicates a number of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients. Of the many complications that arise from ATAAD is malperfusion, which is the result of true lumen compression secondary to the dissection, and it is one of the most dangerous complications. Left untreated, malperfusion can eventually compromise circulation to the vascular beds of almost all vital organs. Clinicians must consider the diagnosis of malperfusion promptly following a diagnosis of acute aortic dissection. The outcomes post-surgery for patients with ATAAD with concomitant malperfusion remains poor, despite mortality for aortic surgery improving over time. Optimal management for ATAAD with associated malperfusion has yet to be implemented, further research is warranted to improve the detection and management of this potentially fatal pathology. In this review, we explore the literature surrounding the complications of malperfusion in ATAAD and the various symptom presentations, investigations, and management strategies available.


2020 ◽  
Vol 160 (1) ◽  
pp. 8-17.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth L. Norton ◽  
Carlo Maria Rosati ◽  
Karen M. Kim ◽  
Xiaoting Wu ◽  
Himanshu J. Patel ◽  
...  

Aorta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 098-101
Author(s):  
Khaled Salhab ◽  
William Gioia ◽  
Andrew Rabenstein ◽  
George Gubernikoff ◽  
Scott Schubach

AbstractThe model of surgery first and always for Type A aortic dissections has continued to evolve. During the last three decades, various studies have demonstrated that in select patients, surgery should be delayed or avoided. This case series examines three cases in which patients were medically treated. Furthermore, we review the literature and when surgery should be delayed for acute Type A aortic dissections.


2012 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 316-319
Author(s):  
Takashi Yoshinaga ◽  
Ryuji Kunitomo ◽  
Shuji Moriyama ◽  
Ken Okamoto ◽  
Hisashi Sakaguchi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. S13-S20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Sadamatsu ◽  
Susumu Takase ◽  
Shuichiro Sagara ◽  
Kensuke Ohe ◽  
Jun-ichiro Nishi ◽  
...  

Background: The feasibility of medical management for select patients with acute type A aortic dissection has been reported from a few institutions. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the safety and feasibility of our conservative approach for patients with type A aortic dissection in daily practice. Methods: From January 2013 to December 2017, 131 consecutive patients were admitted to our institution for acute aortic dissection, including 58 patients of type A. Initial medical management was attempted in select patients who were clinically stable and had a thrombosed false lumen of the ascending aorta without ulcer-like projections in the ascending aorta. Results: Except for nine patients contraindicated for surgery, urgent surgery was performed in 26 patients (SRG group), while 23 patients (MED group) were treated with the initial medical management. The maximum diameter of the ascending aorta was significantly larger in the SRG group than in the MED group. In the MED group, the heart rate and blood pressures were well-controlled at admission to the intensive-care unit, and the systolic blood pressure was further reduced at 24 h after. The in-hospital mortality rates of the MED and SRG groups were 0% and 15%, respectively. During the follow-up period, the survival rate was significantly higher in the MED group than in the SRG group, and the aortic event-free survival at one year was 80%. Conclusions: The initial medical management for select patients with a thrombosed false lumen in the ascending aorta was a safe and feasible strategy in real-world practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document