scholarly journals Medical Management of Three Patients with an Acute Type A Aortic Dissection: Case Series and a Review of the Literature

Aorta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (04) ◽  
pp. 098-101
Author(s):  
Khaled Salhab ◽  
William Gioia ◽  
Andrew Rabenstein ◽  
George Gubernikoff ◽  
Scott Schubach

AbstractThe model of surgery first and always for Type A aortic dissections has continued to evolve. During the last three decades, various studies have demonstrated that in select patients, surgery should be delayed or avoided. This case series examines three cases in which patients were medically treated. Furthermore, we review the literature and when surgery should be delayed for acute Type A aortic dissections.

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erol Kohli ◽  
Sharhabeel Jwayyed ◽  
Gary Giorgio ◽  
Mary Colleen Bhalla

Aortic dissection is a relatively rare yet often fatal condition. Early recognition and treatment are crucial for survival. While the majority of patients who present with aortic dissection are older than 50 years of age and have a history of hypertension, younger patients with connective tissue disease, bicuspid aortic valves, and a family history of aortic dissection are also at an increased risk for developing this condition. A review of the literature revealed a paucity of published cases describing the successful, emergent repair of acute type A aortic dissections in third- trimester gravid patients. We present the case of the successful diagnosis and surgical repair of a 41-year-old female who presented to the emergency department with an acute type A aortic dissection at 36 weeks of gestation.


Aorta ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (05) ◽  
pp. 109-112
Author(s):  
Jehangir Appoo ◽  
Akash Fichadiya ◽  
Holly Smith ◽  
Vamshi Kotha ◽  
Eric Herget ◽  
...  

AbstractAdvances in open and endovascular techniques have resulted in novel approaches to repair of acute Type A aortic dissection. Hybrid arch procedures involve open arch resection and stent grafting of the descending aorta with stent graft insertion in one of two ways: Frozen or Staged. In this article, pros and cons of the two different paradigms of emerging hybrid arch techniques for acute Type A aortic dissections are discussed.


2018 ◽  
Vol 9 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. S13-S20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenji Sadamatsu ◽  
Susumu Takase ◽  
Shuichiro Sagara ◽  
Kensuke Ohe ◽  
Jun-ichiro Nishi ◽  
...  

Background: The feasibility of medical management for select patients with acute type A aortic dissection has been reported from a few institutions. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the safety and feasibility of our conservative approach for patients with type A aortic dissection in daily practice. Methods: From January 2013 to December 2017, 131 consecutive patients were admitted to our institution for acute aortic dissection, including 58 patients of type A. Initial medical management was attempted in select patients who were clinically stable and had a thrombosed false lumen of the ascending aorta without ulcer-like projections in the ascending aorta. Results: Except for nine patients contraindicated for surgery, urgent surgery was performed in 26 patients (SRG group), while 23 patients (MED group) were treated with the initial medical management. The maximum diameter of the ascending aorta was significantly larger in the SRG group than in the MED group. In the MED group, the heart rate and blood pressures were well-controlled at admission to the intensive-care unit, and the systolic blood pressure was further reduced at 24 h after. The in-hospital mortality rates of the MED and SRG groups were 0% and 15%, respectively. During the follow-up period, the survival rate was significantly higher in the MED group than in the SRG group, and the aortic event-free survival at one year was 80%. Conclusions: The initial medical management for select patients with a thrombosed false lumen in the ascending aorta was a safe and feasible strategy in real-world practice.


VASA ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (5) ◽  
pp. 377-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamer Ghazy ◽  
Adrian Mahlmann ◽  
Zuzana Fajfrova ◽  
Ayham Darwish ◽  
Mohamed Eraqi ◽  
...  

Abstract. Background: This study reports the mid-term prevalence and therapeutic consequences of anastomotic leaks after surgery for Stanford type A aortic dissections. Patients and methods: From July 2007 to July 2013, 93 patients survived surgery for acute type A dissections at our center and underwent a standardized follow-up. The pre-, peri-, and postoperative as well as the midterm results were collected prospectively. Follow-up computed tomography (CT) imaging was performed 7 days, 3, and 12 months after surgery, and yearly thereafter, to assess the presence or progression of anastomotic leaks at the aorto-prosthesis anastomotic sites. Results: The mean follow-up was 4 years (1534 ± 724 days). Follow-up CT revealed anastomotic leaks in 4 patients (4.3 %). All leaks developed during midterm follow-up and half of them did not increase with time. Two patients required redo surgery for an increase in periaortic extravasation and compression of neighboring structures. Further analysis was not able to reveal independent risk factors for development or deterioration of leaks. Conclusions: Anastomotic leaks after surgery for Stanford Type A aortic dissection can develop in midterm follow-up, even after initially excellent results. Meticulous follow-up is mandatory to detect possible deterioration and a need for redo surgery.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Surendran ◽  
D Bleetman ◽  
D Whitaker

Abstract Introduction Acute-aortic-dissection (AAD) represents a serious cardiovascular emergency, with an associated mortality of 1-2% per hour after symptom onset. It is known that the relative infrequency of AAD and plausible differentials can negatively impact on a timely diagnosis. Female sex, absence of typical features and high-risk examination findings (hypotension/pulse deficits) shown to delay diagnosis. In UK, services for AAD are centralised, working on established volume/outcome relationships. However, this has the potential to introduce delays in rapidly diagnosing patients without on-site specialist support and in the logistics of transferring patients across large distances. This study aims to report on time taken for patients to receive surgery after first presentation at local hospital and identify points that contribute to maximal delay. Method Retrospective analysis of all operated type-A-aortic-dissections at our hospital in 2019. Hospital database used to identify patients, and local/referring hospital documentation reviewed to establish times. Results Mean time from A&E presentation to surgery is 8-hours-and-30 minutes (4:16–13:43). Largest contributor to delay is time from A&E admission to CT scan. Conclusions Our findings suggest greatest impact on improving times from presentation to surgery is to increase awareness of AAD in regional, non-specialist hospitals and to encourage rapid imaging.


2013 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 52-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michalis N. Gionis ◽  
George Kaimasidis ◽  
Emmanouel Tavlas ◽  
Nikolaos Kontopodis ◽  
Marina Plataki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document