scholarly journals Additional chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia positive chronic myeloid leukemia

2019 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunila Tashfeen Arif ◽  
Rafia Mahmood ◽  
Saleem Ahmed Khan ◽  
Tahir Khadim

Objective: To determine the frequency of additional chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia chromosome positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) by conventional cytogenetic analysis. Methods: This descriptive cross sectional study was conducted at Armed Forces Institute of Pathology (AFIP), Rawalpindi, from January 2012 to December 2016. A total number of 528 newly diagnosed CML patients were included in the study. The subjects were tested for the presence of Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome and other additional cytogenetic abnormalities by conventional cytogenetic analysis interpreted according to International System of Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature (ISCN) criteria. Molecular analysis for BCR-ABL was also performed for each patient. The additional cytogenetic abnormalities were then classified into major route abnormalities and minor route abnormalities. Results: Out of the 528 newly diagnosed CML patients, 378 (71.6%) were males and 150 (28.4%) were females. The age of patients ranged between 18 to 74 years. Four hundred and ninety-eight (94.3%) patients showed Philadelphia chromosome on karyotyping while 30 (5.7%) were negative for the Philadelphia chromosome. On analysis of these 498 Philadelphia positive patients, additional cytogenetic aberrations were detected in 26 (4.9%) patients. Of these, 7 (1.3%) had major route abnormalities while 19 (3.6%) had minor route abnormalities. Conclusion: The frequency of additional chromosomal abnormalities in our study were not in accordance with previous local and international studies. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.1384 How to cite this:Tashfeen S, Mahmood R, Khan SA, Khadim T. Additional chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia positive chronic myeloid leukemia. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(2):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.36.2.1384 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4783-4783
Author(s):  
Andrew P. Landstrom ◽  
Rhett P. Ketterling ◽  
Ryan A. Knudson ◽  
Gordon W. Dewald ◽  
Ayalew Tefferi

Abstract Background: Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is invariably associated with the reciprocal translocation of BCR and ABL to form the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph), t(9;22)(q34;q11). At diagnosis, a small proportion of patients display additional cytogenetic abnormalities and/or a variable proportion of cytogenetically normal metaphases that coexist with Ph-positive metaphases. The objective of the current study was to examine the prognostic relevance of these two scenarios. Methods: The study population consisted of 65 (47.7% female) consecutive, newly diagnosed CML patients seen at the Mayo Clinic with a median age of 59 years. 44.5 percent were initially treated with interferon alpha (IFN) resulting in complete cytogenetic remission in 10.7 percent for a median length of 5.83 years, partial cytogenetic remission in 3.57 percent for a median length of 2 years. 55.5 percent were treated with imatinib (Gleevec) resulting in complete cytogenetic remission in 54.1 percent for a median length of 3.08 years, partial cytogenetic remission in 13.5% for a median length of 1.08 years. Results: Survival at five years through Kaplan-Meier analysis was approximately 92 percent in patients demonstrating only the Ph chromosome (n = 53), versus 60 percent in patients with additional chromosomal abnormalities (n = 12; p < 0.0001 by both Logrank and Breslow-Gehan-Wilcox analysis). Furthermore, patients with additional chromosomal abnormalities demonstrated lower rates of either complete or partial cytogenetic remission with imatinib therapy. Similarly, five year survival of patients with less than 90% Ph-positive metaphases at diagnosis (n = 4) was approximately 60% compared to 92% in patients with greater than 90% Ph-positive metaphases (n = 61; p = 0.01 by Logrank and p = 0.001 by Breslow-Gehan-Wilcox analysis). Additionally, the former group of patients was significantly less responsive to imatinib. Finally, there was significant correlation between Ph-positive metaphase mosaicism and the presence of additional chromosomal abnormalities (p = 0.05). Conclusion: Although it is tempting to speculate the possibility that Ph-chromosome mosaicism and/or additional cytogenetic abnormalities at presentation of CML is a surrogate for the presence of Ph-negative imatinib-resistant clones, the preliminary results from the current study require validation from a larger study. Figure Figure Figure Figure


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1577-1577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghayas C. Issa ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Gautam Borthakur ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) in the Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative metaphases that emerge as patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been reported during treatment with imatinib. It has been suggested that these might be associated with an inferior outcome and in rare instances lead to the emergence of a new malignant clone resulting in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (Jabbour et. al, Blood 2007). This phenomenon has not been well characterized when other TKIs are used. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients treated on imatinib, dasatinib, nilotinib, and ponatinib frontline trials to assess the frequency and prognostic impact of ACAs appearing during the treatment after achieving cytogenetic response. Patients and Methods A total of 524 patients with CML were evaluated with a median age at diagnosis of 48 years (range 15 to 86). These included 236 patients treated with imatinib, 125 with nilotinib, 118 with dasatinib and 45 with ponatinib. All the patients were treated in clinical trials approved by the institutional board review and signed an informed consent in accordance with institutional guidelines and in accordance with the declaration of Helsenki. Conventional cytogenetic analysis was done in bone marrow cells using standard G-banding technique at baseline, every 3 months during the first year, then every 6-12 months. Clonal ACAs were identified as abnormalities present in ≥2/20 metaphases or, if only one metaphase, present in ≥2 consecutive assessments. Results After a median follow-up of 83.8 months (range 0.3-176.6 months) 13% (72/524) patients had ACAs, of which 7% (41/524) were clonal. ACAs were seen in 11% (27/236) of patients on imatinib compared to 11% (13/118, p=0.9) on dasatinib, 19 % (24/125, p= 0.04) on nilotinib, and 17% (8/45, p=0.2) on ponatinib. Six patients had both clonal evolution (CE) and ACAs at different times. The median number of metaphases containing ACAs was 5/20 (range 1 to 20) with an average of 7/20. Most appeared within the first year of the start of the TKI (median 6 months, range 3-72 months); they first appeared after 12 months of therapy in 21 of the 72 (29%) patients. ACAs were transient and were detected in 2 or less time points in 52 of the 72 (72%) cases. The most common clonal ACAs were - Y (13/41) and +8 (4/41). The rates of cytogenetic and molecular responses were similar for patients with and without clonal ACAs (CCyR: 88% vs 91%; p=0.55) (MMR: 78% vs 86%, p=0.20). Having clonal ACAs did not affect the rate of deep molecular response either (MR4.5 71% vs 67%; p =0.65). There was no significant difference in EFS and OS (5y EFS 73% vs 86%; p=0.19) (5y OS 77% vs 93%; p=0.06) although there was a trend for lower rates for both. Responses and clinical outcomes were similar between different TKIs for patients with and without clonal ACAs. One patient with -7 treated with ponatinib developed MDS. Monosomy 7 appeared 9 months from the start of treatment in 9/20 metaphases and persisted. He was taken off ponatinib because of pancytopenia. He subsequently received bosutinib, achieved and maintained a CCyR. A high-risk MDS was documented approximately 1 year after appearance of the -7 clone. He was started on decitabine and achieved a partial cytogenetic response for MDS. Another patient in the imatinib cohort with -7 developed secondary AML (CCyR for CML) and died from a multiple organ failure after allogeneic stem cell transplant from a one antigen-mismatched unrelated donor. There was a third patient with -7 that later had CE and developed Ph+ CML blast phase. Conclusion ACAs are rare and mostly transient events that appear during the treatment of CML with TKIs. These changes do not affect responses or clinical outcomes, independent of what TKI is used. A small subset of patients with -7 may develop AML or MDS warranting close monitoring of patients with changes that are reminiscent of those diseases. Molecular analysis after appearance of ACAs could help identify mutations driving the Ph-clone into AML or MDS. Disclosures Pemmaraju: Stemline: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; LFB: Consultancy, Honoraria. Cortes:BerGenBio AS: Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Teva: Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ariad: Consultancy, Research Funding; Astellas: Consultancy, Research Funding; Ambit: Consultancy, Research Funding; Arog: Research Funding; Celator: Research Funding; Jenssen: Consultancy.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1090-1090 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
...  

Abstract The development of chromosomal abnormalities in the Ph-negative metaphases during IM therapy of CML has been recognized mostly in pts who failed prior therapy. Prior exposure to cytarabine has been suggested to be a predisposing factor. This phenomenon has not been yet assessed to date in patients with newly diagnosed CML and treated with IM. This is different from clonal evolution where the abnormalities are observed in the Ph-positive metaphases. We assessed the frequency and the significance of this event among 258 newly diagnosed pts with CML receiving IM (800 mg/d n=207, 400 mg/d n=51) as first line of therapy between March 2001 and April 2005. After a median follow-up of 30 months (range, 6–48 months), 19 pts (7%) developed 21 chromosomal abnormalities in Ph-negative metaphases. Thirteen (62%) of these abnormalities have been seen in 2 or more metaphases. The median time from the start of IM to appearance of abnormalities was 18 months (range, 3–36 months). The most common cytogenetic abnormalities were: loss of chromosome Y (n=7, 33%), trisomy 8 (n=3, 14%), and deletion of chromosome 7 (n=2, 10%). Excluding loss of chromosome Y abnormalities, the incidence was 5%. All pts achieved a major (Ph < 35%) cytogenetic (CG) response (complete cytogenetic response [CCGR] in 17 [89%] pts). Major molecular response (BCR-ABL/ABL ratio <0.05) was observed in 13 (68%) pts (including 2 with complete molecular response). In all but 4 pts these events have been transient and disappeared after a median of 4 months (range, 3–9 months). In 4 pts (loss of chromosome Y n=3, trisomy 8 n=1), they persisted for a median of 13+ months (range, 6+–24+ months). One pt developed acute myeloid leukemia (associated with -7); none of the other pts has any feature of myelodysplasia. After a median follow-up of 13 months (range, 1–42 months), 17 of the 19 pts are alive. One pt died after allogeneic stem cell transplantation, and one died after 6 months of CCGR from myocardial infarction. One pt lost response to IM. The remaining 16 pts are in major CG response at the last follow-up. We conclude that: 1) cytogenetic abnormalities occur in Ph-negative cells in a small fraction of patients (7%; 5% if loss of Y excluded) in newly diagnosed CML on IM; 2) in the majority of cases, they are transient with no clear clinical consequences; 3) in rare instances (loss of chromosome 7 only in our study) they could reflect the emergence of a new malignant clone necessitating and a close follow-up.


2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-39
Author(s):  
Shafaq Maqsood ◽  
Fatima Ali ◽  
Abdul Hameed ◽  
Neelam Siddiqui

Background and Purpose: Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) is a common hematological malignancy. The characteristic molecular abnormality is the presence of Philadelphia chromosome or BCR-ABL fusion gene which is the result of 9:22 translocation. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) form the main stay of treatment in CML with excellent responses. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of additional chromosomal abnormalities on outcomes in CML.Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of all patients who were diagnosed with CML in chronic phase (CP) with additional chromosomal abnormalities (ACAs) over a period of 5 years from 2010 to 2015 at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan. Results: A total of 283 patients were diagnosed with CML from January 2010 to January 2015. 31 patients out of these were found to have additional chromosomal abnormalities at the time of diagnosis in addition to BCR-ABL fusion gene or Philadelphia chromosome detection. Out of these 31 patients, 23 (74.2%) were males whereas 8 (25.8%) were females. 13 (41.9%) were in the age group of 31 to 50 years whereas the other two groups that is 18 to 30 years and 51 to 70 years had 9 patients each. After approval from the government which usually takes a standard 2-3 weeks’ time, these patients were started on tyrosine kinase inhibitors which was Imatinib in 30 (96.8%) and Nilotinib in 1 (3.2%) patient. Conventional cytogenetic analysis performed for each patient at the time of diagnosis revealed that 11 (35.5%) of patients had variant Philadelphia chromosome followed by 7 patients (22.6%) with trisomy 8. 5 patients (16.1%) had multiple chromosomal abnormalities including trisomy 8, deletion 1 and isochrome 17q. 2 patents each had isochrome 17q, inversion 3 and deletion 9 abnormalities. 1 patient had deletion 7 whereas 1 had variant Philadelphia chromosome with other chromosomal abnormalities. Conclusion: It was evident that frequently occurring ACAs In our CML population were Variant Philadelphia chromosome and trisomy 8.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 4419-4419
Author(s):  
Yihuan Chai ◽  
Hui Lv ◽  
Jun Lu ◽  
Peifang Xiao ◽  
Jianqing Li

Abstract In childhood acute lymphocyte leukemia (ALL), cytogenetics plays an important role in diagnosis, allocation of treatment and prognosis. On base of the conventional cytogenetic analysis, molecular methods have inproved our ability to accurately and rapidly risk-stratify patient with childhood ALL in the last few years. Our aim was to assess the demography of cytogenetic abnormalities in childhood ALL. The study sample consisted of 124 newly diagnosed ALL patients younger than 16 years, who were diagnosed at the Department of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Soochow University Children’s Hospital. The diagnosis and FAB subtypes of ALL was determined by Wright-Giemsa-stained bone marrow smears and cytochemicalstaining. Immunophenotyping of the bone marrow samples was performed by flow cytometry. Multiplex reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis was performed to detect the 29 most common leukemia translocations for routine molecular diagnostic hematopathology practice, and complement the information gained from conventional cytogenetic analysis. Cytogenetic analysis was successful in 112 of 124 children with ALL. Sixty-eight (60%)of them had clonal chromosomal abnormalities. Numerical imbalances consisted of hyperdipoild(>47 chromosomes, 36 cases), hypodipoild(<46 chromosomes, 14 cases), pseudodiploidy(18 cases). Chromosomal translocations were observed in 13 patients by conventional cytogenetic analysis. Three cases were found positive for t (4;11), 3 cases for t (9;22), 1 case for t (1;19) and 6 cases for other rare translocations. RT-PCR analysis detected 116 of the 124 ALL patients. Thirteen cases of TEL-AML1, 10 cases of rearrangement in the MLL gene, 4 cases of E2A-PBX1, 4 cases of E2A-HLF, 3 cases of BCR-ABL, 2 cases of TLS-ERG, 32 cases of HOX11, were detected by RT-PCR in B-lineage leukemias. SIL-TAL1 had been found in 4 of 7 of T-lineage leukemias. Sixty-eight cases of ALL show chromosomal aberrations. Multiplex PCR positivity was detected in 59(50%)of the 116 ALL patients studied. Multiplex PCR combined with chromosome analysis uncovered Chromosomal abnormalities in 95 of 124(77%) of ALL patients and supplemented each other in detecting Chromosomal abnormalities. It provides reliable evidence for the diagnosis, classification and prognosis.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 5537-5537
Author(s):  
Nader I Al-Dewik ◽  
Hisham Morsi ◽  
Rola Ghasoub ◽  
Mohamed A. Yassin

Abstract Background: The introduction of Imatinib Mesylate (IM) has revolutionized the outcome of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients. However, the success of the rationally designed therapy is tempered by the understanding that a substantial proportion of CML patients fail treatment. In Qatar, 54% of CML patients do fail IM according to European leukemia net (ELN) recommendations 2013. Point mutation & unique tri-nucleotide insertions explained only 14% of treatment failure. Additional chromosomal abnormalities were the most common cause of IM failure in our patients’ cohort & were documented in 50% of cases. 14% of patients stopped IM due to intolerance & the mechanisms of resistance remained unknown in 28% of patients. Other cause such as patients’ adherence to IM is being prospectively investigated. Therefore, Non adherence to IM must be ruled out as a possible cause of lack of optimal response before considering such patients to be IM-resistant & switching them to next-line treatment. Aim: To correlate between CML patients’ adherence to IM treatment & their responses and identify the factors affecting non-adherence. Methods: 36 CML patients (5 citizens & 31 residents) are consented into the study. adherence to Imatinib was assessed using four different techniques: calculation of the Medication Possession Ratio (MPR), electronic Medical Records (eMR), survey questionnaire & Medication Event Monitoring System (MEMS). MPR is defined as the sum of the days' supply of medication divided by the number of days between the first fill & the last refill. Patients medications history was obtained from questionnaire, pharmacy electronic Medical record (eMR) & studying drug – drug interactions was done using MICROMEDEX® 1.0 (Healthcare Series). The Questionnaire used to identify potential factors revolving around the patient's lifestyle, affordability & knowledge related to IM, in addition to standardized evaluation based on the 9-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) ranging from 1 to 13. Scores ≤10 indicates non adherence whereas ≥ 11 indicates adherence. Patient adherence was tracked electronically using the Medication Electronic Monitoring System (MEMS) that provided real time measures of adherence for a period up to 4 months. 95 Peripheral blood (PB) samples were collected & the level of BCR-ABL1 transcripts was measured via RT-QPCR. The ELN 2013 recommendations for the management of CML was adopted & employed in this study to assess the response/resistance of patients to treatment. Responses were defined at the haematological, cytogenetic & molecular levels. Patients responses were classified into optimal, suboptimal or failure. Results: Out of 36 patients, 23 patients were adherent (MMAS, MPR &MEMS were ≥ 80%) & 13 patients were classified as non-adherent (MMAS, MPR &MEMS were <80 % ) All adherent patients were optimally responded to the treatment (achieved CCyR & MMR) while the 13 non-adherent patients failed the treatment (2 patients were intolerant, 9 patients did not achieved CCyR & molecular response & 2 patients developed additional chromosomal abnormalities. Questionnaire feedback results showed that 69% patients could not afford to pay the remaining 10% of its cost, the other factors such as lack of knowledge (comprehensive & insight of illness) & illiteracy were observed in 35% & 30% of patients respectively. Discussion & conclusion: Due to high rate of Imatinib failure in Qatar, patient’s adherence to treatment was studied. Non adherence to the treatment was one of the most common causes of Imatinib failure in our patients’ cohort & was documented in 36% of cases. Economic factor (Unaffordable drug price) was one of the main causes of non-adherence & efforts should be made locally to improve access to medications for cancer diseases. Other risk factors associated with poor adherence can be improved by close monitoring & dose adjustment. Monitoring risk factors for poor adherence in combination with patient education that includes direct communication between the health care teams doctors, nurses pharmacists & patients are essential components for maximizing the benefits of TKI therapy & could rectify this problem. Our preliminary results showed that patients’ response to treatment may be directly linked to patient adherence to the treatment. However, further in-depth & specific analysis may be necessary in a larger cohort. Disclosures Al-Dewik: Hamad Medical Corporation (HMC): Employment, HMC Medical Director's Grant Competition (GC) 1013A Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Morsi:HMC: Employment, Research Funding. Ghasoub:HMC: Employment, Research Funding.


Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (8) ◽  
pp. 2811-2813 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig Kovitz ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
Lynne V. Abruzzo ◽  
Jorge Cortes

AbstractDuring therapy with imatinib, some patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) develop chromosomal abnormalities in Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative cells. These abnormalities are frequently transient and their clinical consequence is unclear. Although some reports have suggested that the abnormalities might be associated with secondary myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), the diagnosis has not always been established using standard criteria. We report 3 cases of patients treated with imatinib for CML who were subsequently found to have chromosomal abnormalities in Ph-negative cells. One of them developed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and the other 2 developed high-risk MDS that rapidly transformed to AML. These cases were identified in a total study group of 1701 patients. Although these occurrences are rare, the findings highlight the need for close monitoring of patients with CML treated with imatinib.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document