scholarly journals Ownership Concentration,Institutional Investor and Firm Performance—Evidence from A-Share Listed Companies

Finance ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 05 (04) ◽  
pp. 91-97
Author(s):  
敏文 胡
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Institutional Investor ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
A Share

scholarly journals Environmental, Social, Governance Activities and Firm Performance: Evidence from China

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 767
Author(s):  
Lei Ruan ◽  
Heng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Emerging Markets ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Regulatory Agencies ◽  
Rating Data ◽  
Social Governance ◽  
Environmentally Sensitive ◽  
Regulatory Measures ◽  
A Share

Increasingly noticeable environmental and risk problems have made more and more companies and regulatory agencies realize the importance of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) activities. However, on the question that whether ESG activities have promoted or reduced firm performance, there is still no consensus. Especially for China, a representative country in emerging markets whose corporate ESG activities are still in their infancy and related systems and regulatory measures not complete, its theoretical and practical circles more urgently need to know an accurate answer to this question. Therefore, this article takes China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen A-share listed companies that have ESG rating data from 2015 to 2019 as samples and finds that corporate ESG activities have a significantly negative impact on firm performance. Further research finds that compared with state-owned enterprises and environmentally sensitive enterprises, non-state-owned enterprises and non-environmentally sensitive enterprises provide stronger evidence to support the above conclusions.

Independent directors, ownership concentration and firm performance in listed companies

2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 204-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thi Tuyet Mai Nguyen ◽  
Elaine Evans ◽  
Meiting Lu
Keyword(s):  
Corporate Governance ◽  
Firm Performance ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Ordinary Least Squares ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Independent Directors ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Controlling Shareholders ◽  
The Impact ◽  
The Relationship

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the impact of independent directors on firm performance in Vietnam and identify how different types of ownership structure and the presence of controlling shareholders influence the relationship. Design/methodology/approach For a sample of 217 non-financial Vietnam-listed companies during the period from 2010 to 2014, this study uses the ordinary least squares regressions to estimate the relationship between independent directors and firm performance. Two econometric techniques – the fixed effects estimation and the difference in difference estimation – are used to control for endogeneity. The results are also robust to the lag variable of independent directors. Findings The results reveal that independent directors have an overall negative effect on firm operating performance. This finding may be because of information asymmetry, expertise disadvantage and the dominance of ownership concentration that prevent independent directors from fulfilling their monitoring function in governance. The negative relationship between independent directors and firm performance is stronger in firms where the State is a controlling shareholder. Research limitations/implications Findings suggest that changes relating to independent directors, as a response to the new corporate governance code in 2012, do not have a positive effect on the relationship between corporate governance and firm performance. Further reform is required to improve internal control mechanisms and corporate governance systems in Vietnam. Originality/value This is the first study to provide a robust evidence on the relationship between independent directors and firm performance in Vietnam as well as to explore the impact of the type of controlling shareholders on the relationship.

scholarly journals Conceptualizing the Moderating Role of CEO Power and Ownership Concentration in the Relationship between Audit Committee and Firm Performance: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 6329
Author(s):  
Sohail Ahmad Javeed ◽  
Tze San Ong ◽  
Rashid Latief ◽  
Haslinah Muhamad ◽  
Wei Ni Soh
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Audit Committee ◽  
Developing Economies ◽  
Generalized Method Of Moments ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Ownership Concentration ◽  
Fe Model ◽  
Ceo Power ◽  
Moderating Factors

Firms in developing economies generally find ways to enhance their reputation and growth in the international market. In this context, an Audit Committee (AC) is composed of multiple skilled members that control and monitor auditing activities and present a transparent image of their firm, which automatically attracts investors and builds investor confidence. Therefore, this study used CEO power and ownership concentration as moderating factors to examine the connection between AC and firm performance. For this purpose, this study used the data of Pakistani manufacturing firms for the period 2008 to 2018 and applied the Ordinary Least Square (OLS) method, the Fixed Effect (FE) model, and the Generalized Method of Moments (GMM). To check the robustness of the results, this study used a Feasible Generalized Least Square (FGLS) model. The findings of this study contended that AC and firm performance have a positive association with each other. Moreover, the findings revealed that CEO power positively influenced firm performance. Furthermore, lower ownership concentration is a valuable approach to maximize a firm’s performance. Importantly, the outcomes concluded that AC and firm performance have a positive connection with the moderating effects of CEO power. Moreover, AC and firm performance also have a positive association with the moderating effect of ownership concentration.

scholarly journals Determinants of Firm Performance: Evidence from Romanian Listed Companies

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 53-69 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastian Lazăr
Keyword(s):  
Firm Performance ◽  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Value Added ◽  
Listed Companies ◽  
Sales Growth ◽  
Fixed Effects Model ◽  
Resource Based View ◽  
Firm Profitability ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
Positive Effect

AbstractThe paper investigates firm-specific determinants of firm profitability for Romanian listed companies over the 2000-2011 period within the framework of resource based view of the firm. The results show that tangibles, leverage, size and labour intensity have negative effect on firm performance, while sales growth and value added have a positive effect. The results prove robust when introducing two-way fixed effects model and industry year effects model (in order to simultaneously account for specific industry characteristics and time effects).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document