The Objective Cost Management of Long-distance Pipeline Construction Projects

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (03) ◽  
pp. 65-69
Author(s):  
瑞 王
2011 ◽  
Vol 480-481 ◽  
pp. 1197-1200
Author(s):  
Feng Liu ◽  
Jun Min Wang

In recent years, in order to reduce building energy consumption in China, and vigorously promote the development of ecological construction, the paper studies disadvantages of the cost of traditional project management applications in the ecological construction projects, exploring specific cost management adapt to the ecological construction project.


ICPTT 2012 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuhuai Mu ◽  
Jianfeng Gao ◽  
Jinhong Huo ◽  
ChengLei Wang ◽  
Conggang Jiang

2019 ◽  
pp. 157-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohamed Ibrahim Khalifa Halou ◽  
Razali Samin ◽  
Mushtaq Ahmad

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (15) ◽  
pp. 5171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Temitope Omotayo ◽  
Awuzie Bankole ◽  
Ayokunle Olubunmi Olanipekun

The post-contract phase of the construction process remains critical to cost management. Several techniques have been used to facilitate effective cost management in this phase. However, the deployment of these techniques has not caused a reduction in the incidence of cost overruns hence casting doubts on their utility. The seeming underwhelming performance posted by these post-contract cost control techniques (PCCTs), has been traced to improper deployment by construction project managers (CPM) and quantity surveyors (QS). Utilizing the perspectives of CPM and QS professionals, as elicited through a survey, produced 135 samples. The instrumentality of the artificial neural networks (ANN) in this study enabled the development of a structured decision-support methodology for analysing the most appropriate PCCTs to be deployed to different construction process phases. Besides showcasing the utility of the emergent ANN-based decision support methodology, the study’s theoretical findings indicate that CPM and QS professionals influence decisions pertaining to PCCTs choice in distinct phases of the construction process. Whereas QS professionals were particularly responsible for the choice of PCCTs during the initial and mid-level phases, CPM professionals assumed responsibility for PCCTs selection during the construction process close-out phase. In construction cost management practice, the crucial PCCTs identifies more with the application of historical data and all cost monitoring approaches.


2012 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
pp. 99-110 ◽  
Author(s):  
Greg Duffy ◽  
Asregedew Woldesenbet ◽  
“David” Hyung Seok Jeong ◽  
Garold D. Oberlender

2015 ◽  
Vol 776 ◽  
pp. 121-126
Author(s):  
Nyoman Martha Jaya ◽  
Ariany Frederika

Project overheads are allocated on a percentage basis to project costs and common to maintain multiple cost objects, but cannot directly be distributed to construction activities. Construction project overheads have to be identified their cost behaviours properly in order to sustain Cost Management and Controlling Practices (CMCPs) during the construction stage. The literature review method identified forty seven (47)project overheads and categorised into four hierarchies (unit, batch, project, and facility levels). Therefore, the identification of project overheads should enable a sustainable improvement to the CMCPs in construction projects.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 115-122
Author(s):  
Ernest Oria Ihendeson ◽  
Awajiogak A Ujile ◽  
Anthony K. Leol

This study aim to proffer solution to the factors causing delay is pipeline construction project deliverables, it compared deterministic model (variable with certainty) and stochastic model (variable with uncertainty), with Six (6) planned project schedules of Brownfield Energy Service Limited for pipeline construction. Time assigned to critical activities, identified from a network analysis, with the aid of the Critical Path Method, expected mean time, both deterministic and stochastic duration was calculated. Program Evaluation Review Techniques (PERT), the variance and standard deviation of the critical activities were also calculated. The probability of completion of a project within a given period was gotten with PERT. Comparing the results for deterministic duration 60 days to 79 days, which is 50% compared to 64%. It was concluded that stochastic model is preferable when scheduling and executing pipeline construction projects, because uncertainties are factored into the planning and scheduling process including delays. Delays during execution stage, occurs mainly due to community related issues, equipment failures, change in job scope and work- men antics but not limited to these. This study advocates elimination of causes of delay, especially before and during project execution phase. It also suggested that every project schedule should follow an order of precedents, prerequisite, and management involvement and cooperation at all stages of the project


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document