scholarly journals Use of coal derived humic acid as soil conditioner for soil physical properties and its impact on wheat crop yield

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (12) ◽  
pp. 81-89 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 268-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ijaz Ahmad ◽  
Safdar Ali ◽  
Khalid Khan ◽  
Fayyaz Hassan ◽  
Kashif Bashir

2021 ◽  
pp. 44-57
Author(s):  
Kh. A. Shaban ◽  
M. A. Esmaeil ◽  
A. K. Abdel Fattah ◽  
Kh. A. Faroh

A field experiment was carried out at Khaled Ibn El-waleed village, Sahl El-Hussinia, El-Sharkia Governorate, Egypt, during two summer seasons 2019 and 2020 to study the effect of NPK nanofertilizers, biofertilizers and humic acid combined with or without mineral fertilizers different at rates on some soil physical properties and soybean productivity and quality under saline soil conditions. The treatments consisted of: NPK-chitosan, NPK-Ca, humic acid, biofertilzer and control (mineral NPK only). In both seasons, the experiment was carried out in a split plot design with three replicates. The results indicated a significant increase in the soybean yield parameters as compared to control. There was also a significant increase in dry and water stable aggregates in all treatments as compared to control. The treatment NPK-Chitosan was the best in improving dry and stable aggregates. Also, hydraulic conductivity and total porosity values were significantly increased in all treatments due to increase in soil aggregation and porosity that led to increase in values of hydraulic conductivity. Values of bulk density were decreased, the lowest values of bulk density were found in NPK-chitosan treatment as a result of the high concentration of organic matter resulted from NPK-chitosan is much lighter in weight than the mineral fraction in soils. Accordingly, the increase in the organic fraction decreases the total weight and bulk density of the soil. Concerning soil moisture constants, all treatments significantly increased field capacity and available water compared to control. This increase was due to improvement of the soil aggregates and pores spaces which allowed the free movement of water within the soil thereby, increasing the moisture content at field capacity.


2007 ◽  
Vol 99 (4) ◽  
pp. 1104-1110 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. A. Quincke ◽  
C. S. Wortmann ◽  
M. Mamo ◽  
T. Franti ◽  
R. A. Drijber ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. 1142-1154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig G. Cogger ◽  
Andy I. Bary ◽  
Elizabeth A. Myhre ◽  
Ann-Marie Fortuna ◽  
Doug P. Collins

1994 ◽  
Vol 122 (1) ◽  
pp. 107-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. C. Joshi ◽  
D. D. Haokip ◽  
K. N. Singh

SUMMARYThe effects of green manuring with Sesbania aculeata, or with Leucaena leucocephala leaves and of weed incorporation on the physical properties of a clay loam soil under a rice–wheat rotation were compared at New Delhi, India, in 1986–87. Under puddled conditions, the volumetric moisture content of the saturated topsoils varied from 0·400 cm3/cm3 in the Sesbania-treated plots to 0·425 cm3/cm3 in plots receiving no green manure, but in the unsaturated soils at rice harvest the corresponding values were 0·317 and 0·271 cm3/cm3. The effects of the green manures on the water content of the soils were still evident after a subsequent wheat crop. Other soil physical properties affected by the treatments were the following (data refer to topsoils measured after the rice harvest): settling index (cm/cm), an estimate of structural instability, which ranged from 25·5% (Sesbania-treated plots), to 28·6% (weed incorporation), 29·7% (Leucaena-treated plots) and to 33·5% (NPK-fertilizer only). Soil dispersion increased from 6·0 to 10·0 g/100g through the same treatment sequence. Hydraulic conductivity in the NPK-fertilizer only plots was 31 cm/day, but increased to 4·8 cm/day in the Sesbania-trealed plots. Sesbania was superior to the other green manures for improving soil physical properties after its incorporation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 184 ◽  
pp. 153-163
Author(s):  
Peter Bilson Obour ◽  
Dorothee Kolberg ◽  
Mathieu Lamandé ◽  
Trond Børresen ◽  
Gareth Edwards ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 194 ◽  
pp. 104334 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Dekemati ◽  
Barbara Simon ◽  
Szergej Vinogradov ◽  
Márta Birkás

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document