Judicial Practice of Re-Adjudication of Entered into Force Court Decisions in Civil Procedure

10.12737/5801 ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (10) ◽  
pp. 96-101
Author(s):  
Natalya Zabramnaya
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Judicial Practice

scholarly journals On the issue of violation of the uniformity of judicial practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 113-117
Author(s):  
N. Sh. Gadzhialieva ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Russian Federation ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Procedure Code ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Legislative Changes

The article is devoted to such grounds for the cancellation or amendment of court decisions in the supervisory procedure, as a violation of the uniformity of judicial practice. The author analyzes the provisions of the current civil procedure legislation, the explanations of the Plenum and the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on the application of paragraph 3 of Article 391.9 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. The article identifies such problems as the lack of normative consolidation of the terms "judicial practice" "unity of judicial practice", the uncertainty of the legal status of acts of the highest judicial instance, the possibility of bringing judges to disciplinary responsibility for violating the unity of judicial practice. Based on the results of the study, the author comes to the conclusion that comprehensive legislative changes are necessary to achieve the unity of judicial practice

scholarly journals Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial: Beberapa Catatan Masukan RUU Hukum Acara Perdata

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-350
Author(s):  
Dwi Maryono ◽  
Muhamad Azhar
Keyword(s):  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decisions

Abstract This paper aims to describe the existence of the decisions of the industrial relations court, especially related to the execution of the decisions of the industrial relations court. This article only elaborates on the empirical issues that have become the problem in carrying out the execution of the decisions of the industrial relations court. The interim findings show that efforts must be made to provide space for the execution of the industrial relations court. So far, the execution of barren industrial relations court decisions has not been implemented. One reason is the lack of regulation on the procedure for the execution of industrial relations court decisions in Law No. 2 of 2004 concerning the Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes. The solution is left to the execution procedure at Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR) and Rechtsreglement voor de Buitengewesten (Rbg). Keywords: Decision Execution, Industrial Relations Court, Indonesian Civil Procedure  Abstrak Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menguraikan keberadaan putusan pengadilan hubungan industrial, khusunya terkait dengan eksekusi putusan pengadilan hubungan industrial. Tulisan ini hanya menguraikan sekilan permasalahan empiris yang menjadi kendalam dalam melaksanakan eksekusi putusan pengadilan hubungan industrial. Hasil temuan sementara menunjukan bahwa harus ada upaya untuk memberikan ruang bagi pelaksanaan eksekusi pengadilan hubungan industrial. Selama ini eksekusi putusan  pengadilan hubungan industrial mandul, tidak dapat dilaksanakan. Salah satu penyebabnya adalah tidak adanya pengaturan tata cara eksekusi putusan pengadilan hubungan industrial dalam Undang Undang Nomor 2 tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Penyelesaiannya diserahkan kepada tatacara eksekusi pada Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR) dan Rechtsreglement voor de Buitengewesten (Rbg). Kata Kunci: Eksekusi Putusan, Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial, RUU Hukum Acara Perdata

scholarly journals JURISDICTION OF APPLICATIONS FOR THE REVISION OF JUDICIAL ACTS ON NEWLY DISCOVERED OR NEW CIRCUMSTANCES AND THE PROCEDURAL AND LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF ITS VIOLATION

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 1141-1168
Author(s):  
Safura T. Bagylly ◽  
Larisa N. Pavlova
Keyword(s):  
Legal Regulation ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Unified Approach ◽  
Scientific Methods ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Scientific Analysis ◽  
Domestic Legislation ◽  
General Scientific ◽  
Administrative Proceedings ◽  
Legal Consequences

The article deals with the problematic items of choosing a court competent to review court decisions that have entered into legal force on newly discovered or new circumstances in civil and administrative proceedings. The aim of the authors is to conduct a study of the legal regulation of the jurisdiction of applications for review. The methodological basis of the article was formed by general scientific (analysis, analogy, description, synthesis, and systemic approach) and particular scientific methods (historical-legal, comparative-legal, and formal-legal). A retrospective analysis of legal acts of domestic legislation has been carried out. According to the results of the study, difficulties relate to interpreting and applying the existing rules on determining the appropriate instance for revision. Based on the analysis of the judicial practice of courts of general jurisdiction and arbitral courts, the authors come to the conclusion that there is no unified approach of the courts in determining the procedural and legal consequences of violations of the rules of jurisdiction. The conclusion summarizes proposals for improving the current legislation to eliminate ambiguities and achieve uniformity in judicial practice.

Establishing the Circumstances of Civil Cases: Some Doctrinal and Practical Approaches

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (12) ◽  
pp. 53-68
Author(s):  
S. M. Mikhailov ◽  
M. D. Olegov
Keyword(s):  
Russian Federation ◽  
General Rule ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Legal Fiction ◽  
Close Relationship ◽  
Arbitration Procedure ◽  
The Russian Federation ◽  
Civil Cases ◽  
True Knowledge

The paper analyzes certain provisions of civil procedural legislation in terms of their effectiveness as a means of establishing actual circumstances of civil cases by the court from the standpoint of doctrine and judicial practice. The authors examine the relationship between the presentation and disclosure of evidence, draw a conclusion about their close relationship, and their identification, sometimes admitted by judicial practice, is critically assessed. The question of the period for disclosure of evidence was investigated, in respect of which it was concluded that provisions of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, although not quite specific, but sometimes quite definitely allow this period to be established. Taking into account the stance of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, then authors propose a solution to the problem of the consequences of non-disclosure of evidence in a civil case. The paper analyzes individual norms and institutions that allow the court to establish the circumstances of civil cases without evidence or on the basis of explanations of the other party. It is concluded that the norm of the second sentence of Part 1 of Art. 68 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation is neither a legal fiction nor an evidentiary presumption. This is one of the manifestations of the action of the general rule for the distribution of the duty of proof. The authors support and justify the position that the norm of Part 31 of Art. 70 of the Arbitration Procedure Code of the Russian Federation is an evidentiary presumption, and the presumption not of fact, but of evidence. In relation to Part 3 of Art. 79 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, it is concluded that establishment of the facts by the court by applying this norm does not mean obtaining true knowledge about them. Therefore, this provision of the civil procedure law is applied in judicial practice with extreme care.

scholarly journals Production model for administration of judicial decisions in the case of theft

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 04012
Author(s):  
Anna Bakurova ◽  
Mariia Pasichnyk ◽  
Elina Tereschenko ◽  
Yurii Filei
Keyword(s):  
Production System ◽  
Information Society ◽  
Criminal Code ◽  
Production Model ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Court System ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Level Of Automation ◽  
Fuzzy Production System

The economic essence of the theft, as a crime against property, and its connection to unemployment is revealed. The general model of the support system making court decisions as fuzzy production system is developed. For the case of theft (Article 185 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), two variants of the implementation of the fuzzy production system - the Mamdani and Sugeno algorithms - are proposed. Incorporation of the developed model into the “Electronic Court” system, which is a feature of the information society, is able to increase the level of automation of judicial practice and prevent corruption.

scholarly journals Zarzut potrącenia jako podstawa powództwa opozycyjnego po zmianach wprowadzonych na mocy ustawy z dnia 4 lipca 2019 r. o zmianie ustawy – Kodeks postępowania cywilnego oraz niektórych innych ustaw (Dz.U. 2019, poz. 1469)

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. 198-212
Author(s):  
Andrzej Olaś ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Practical Application ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
Civil Proceedings ◽  
Theoretical Assumptions

This article discusses the issue of the set-off defense as the basis for an action to limit or cancel the enforceability of an enforceable title after amendments as provided for pursuant to the Act of 4 July 2019 amending the Act – Code of Civil Procedure and some other acts. The purpose of the article is to indicate the basic interpretative issues emerging from the regulations contained in the Article 840 § 1 item 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure which are likely to pose major problems in its practical application and to offer some reasoned proposals for their solution in a manner consistent with theoretical assumptions and at the same time as useful as possible for judicial practice in the civil proceedings.

scholarly journals Realization of res judicata principle in civil proceedings: the experience of foreign countries

2020 ◽  
pp. 220-225
Author(s):  
Tetiana Tsuvina
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Res Judicata ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Subject

  The article is devoted to the analysis of res judicata as an essential element of the legal certainty. Res judicata is considered to be one of the main guaranties of the legal certainty principle in civil procedure which allows a stability of the court decisions in democratic society and increase the public confidence to judiciary.  The author analyzes national characteristics of the realization of the principle of res judicata in civil procedure of foreign countries. The author explores the preclusion effect of court decisions, highlighting two effects of the res judicata principle: positive and negative one. The negative effect of res judicata is aimed at preventing the re-consideration of identical disputes between the parties if the dispute has already been resolved by the court, in turn, the positive effect of res judicata allows the parties to refer to circumstances that have already been established by a court decision in the dispute between them, in new proceedings, where they are involved. It is concluded that there are significant differences in the understanding of this principle in common law and civil law legal systems. The common law countries have a broad understanding of the res judicata principle, which includes positive and negative effects, and is implemented through such institutions as the claim preclusion and the issue preclusion. Civil law countries follow a narrow approach to understanding of res judicata principle, which is limited only by the negative effect and is reflected in the claim preclusion, which blocks filing an identical claim if there is a final court decision on the dispute between the parties. In common law jurisdiction there is a wider conception of the “claim”, according to which it is understood in the context of entire dispute and comprise all claims based on the legal relationship between the parties, whether or not they were the subject of court proceedings. At the same time in civil law countries identity of the claims can be notified with the help of the triple identity test, which contains the identity of the subject of the claim, the identity of the cause of action and the identity of the parties of the claim.

scholarly journals ВПЛИВ СУДОВОЇ ПРАКТИКИ ВЕРХОВНОГО СУДУ УКРАЇНИ НА СИСТЕМУ ДЖЕРЕЛ ЦИВІЛЬНОГО ТА ЦИВІЛЬНО-ПРОЦЕСУАЛЬНОГО ПРАВА УКРАЇНИ

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 245-256
Author(s):  
А. І. Дрішлюк
Keyword(s):  
Supreme Court ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Scientific Article ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Supreme Court ◽  
Author Position ◽  
Research Author

Наукова стаття присвячена визначенню значення рішень Верховного Суду України, прийнятих за результатами розгляду заяв про перегляд судових рішень з мотивів неод­накового застосування судом (судами) касаційної інстанції одних і тих самих норм ма­теріального права в аналогічних правовідносинах, порядку і її вплив на систему джерел цивільного і цивільно-процесуального права, після законодавчого закріплення обов'язко­вості рішень Верховного Суду України для всіх суб'єктів владних повноважень (суб'єктів правозастосовчої діяльності). На підставі проведеного дослідження сформульована авторська позиція щодо систе­ми джерел цивільного права, судової практики, а також впливу останньої на трансфор­мацію системи джерел цивільного та процесуального права України на сучасному етапі її розвитку.   The scientific article is sanctified to determination of value of decisions of the Supreme court of Ukraine, statements accepted on results consideration about the revision of court decisions on reasons of different application by the court (by courts) of appeal instance of one the same norms of material right in analogical legal relationships, order and her influence on the system of sources civil and civil judicial law of Ukraine, after legislative fixing of obligatoryness of decisions of the Supreme court of Ukraine for all the subjects of imperious plenary powers (subjects of law using activity). On the basis of the conducted research author position is formulated in regard to the system of sources civil law, judicial practice, and also the influence of the last on transformation the system of sources civil and civil judicial law of Ukraine on the modern stage of its development.

scholarly journals Judicial mediation in the code of civil procedure of the Republic of Moldova

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandru Prisac ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Legal Institution ◽  
Republic Of Moldova ◽  
Judicial Practice ◽  
The Republic

In this article, a relatively new civil procedural institution from the Code of Civil Procedure of the Republic of Moldova was analyzed. All the procedural conditions in which judicial mediation takes place were analyzed. Those problematic aspects regarding the application in judicial practice of this legal institution were not overlooked. Likewise, those legislative imperfections existing in the Code of Civil Procedure on judicial mediation that we propose to be removed by amending and supplementing this legislative act were highlighted.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document