scholarly journals Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial: Beberapa Catatan Masukan RUU Hukum Acara Perdata

2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 345-350
Author(s):  
Dwi Maryono ◽  
Muhamad Azhar
Keyword(s):  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decisions

Abstract This paper aims to describe the existence of the decisions of the industrial relations court, especially related to the execution of the decisions of the industrial relations court. This article only elaborates on the empirical issues that have become the problem in carrying out the execution of the decisions of the industrial relations court. The interim findings show that efforts must be made to provide space for the execution of the industrial relations court. So far, the execution of barren industrial relations court decisions has not been implemented. One reason is the lack of regulation on the procedure for the execution of industrial relations court decisions in Law No. 2 of 2004 concerning the Settlement of Industrial Relations Disputes. The solution is left to the execution procedure at Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR) and Rechtsreglement voor de Buitengewesten (Rbg). Keywords: Decision Execution, Industrial Relations Court, Indonesian Civil Procedure  Abstrak Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menguraikan keberadaan putusan pengadilan hubungan industrial, khusunya terkait dengan eksekusi putusan pengadilan hubungan industrial. Tulisan ini hanya menguraikan sekilan permasalahan empiris yang menjadi kendalam dalam melaksanakan eksekusi putusan pengadilan hubungan industrial. Hasil temuan sementara menunjukan bahwa harus ada upaya untuk memberikan ruang bagi pelaksanaan eksekusi pengadilan hubungan industrial. Selama ini eksekusi putusan  pengadilan hubungan industrial mandul, tidak dapat dilaksanakan. Salah satu penyebabnya adalah tidak adanya pengaturan tata cara eksekusi putusan pengadilan hubungan industrial dalam Undang Undang Nomor 2 tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial. Penyelesaiannya diserahkan kepada tatacara eksekusi pada Herzien Inlandsch Reglement (HIR) dan Rechtsreglement voor de Buitengewesten (Rbg). Kata Kunci: Eksekusi Putusan, Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial, RUU Hukum Acara Perdata

scholarly journals SIDANG PEMERIKSAAN SETEMPAT PADA PERADILAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DALAM PELAKSANAAN ASAS PERADILAN CEPAT TEPAT ADIL DAN MURAH

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 141
Author(s):  
Holyness Singadimeja ◽  
Sherly Ayuna Puteri
Keyword(s):  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Time Limit ◽  
Procedural Law ◽  
Civil Proceeding ◽  
Case Site

Basically, the procedural law of industrial relations court is quite similar to civil procedure apply in ordinary court. Article 57 of Law No. 2 of 2004 states that the procedural law apply in industrial relations court is civil procedure apply in ordinary court, unless particularly provided in Law No. 2 of 2004. It means that Law No. 2 of 2004 is lex specialis of HIR, RBg, or Rv. Site examination often held in civil proceeding to obtain certain evidence and make clear the case. Unfortunately, in industrial relations case, site examination may lead to obstacles for the judges and the parties, mostly for the employees, since the time limit to solve the case and the costs that should be paid by the parties.

scholarly journals Realization of res judicata principle in civil proceedings: the experience of foreign countries

2020 ◽  
pp. 220-225
Author(s):  
Tetiana Tsuvina
Keyword(s):  
Common Law ◽  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decision ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Certainty ◽  
Res Judicata ◽  
Foreign Countries ◽  
Negative Effect ◽  
The Subject

  The article is devoted to the analysis of res judicata as an essential element of the legal certainty. Res judicata is considered to be one of the main guaranties of the legal certainty principle in civil procedure which allows a stability of the court decisions in democratic society and increase the public confidence to judiciary.  The author analyzes national characteristics of the realization of the principle of res judicata in civil procedure of foreign countries. The author explores the preclusion effect of court decisions, highlighting two effects of the res judicata principle: positive and negative one. The negative effect of res judicata is aimed at preventing the re-consideration of identical disputes between the parties if the dispute has already been resolved by the court, in turn, the positive effect of res judicata allows the parties to refer to circumstances that have already been established by a court decision in the dispute between them, in new proceedings, where they are involved. It is concluded that there are significant differences in the understanding of this principle in common law and civil law legal systems. The common law countries have a broad understanding of the res judicata principle, which includes positive and negative effects, and is implemented through such institutions as the claim preclusion and the issue preclusion. Civil law countries follow a narrow approach to understanding of res judicata principle, which is limited only by the negative effect and is reflected in the claim preclusion, which blocks filing an identical claim if there is a final court decision on the dispute between the parties. In common law jurisdiction there is a wider conception of the “claim”, according to which it is understood in the context of entire dispute and comprise all claims based on the legal relationship between the parties, whether or not they were the subject of court proceedings. At the same time in civil law countries identity of the claims can be notified with the help of the triple identity test, which contains the identity of the subject of the claim, the identity of the cause of action and the identity of the parties of the claim.

scholarly journals Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial melalui Putusan Perdamaian di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Pengadilan Negeri Padang Kelas I (A)

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 35
Author(s):  
Hazar Kusmayanti ◽  
Agus Mulya Karsona ◽  
Efa Laela Fakhriah
Keyword(s):  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Legal Aspect ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
District Court ◽  
Employment Service ◽  
The Past ◽  
Laws And Regulations ◽  
Legal Force

Industrial relations disputes can be resolved through court (litigation) and out of court (non litigation) as stipulated in Law Number 2 of 2016 concerning Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement (PPHI). From the formal legal aspect governing the settlement of industrial relations disputes is the Law Civil Procedure that applies in the General Court, which is usually complicated and long. Usually for litigation at the District Court level, at least the workers/litigants must meet for 8 to 10 days. Padang District Court in the IA Class in order to achieve the principle of Civil Procedure Law Fast, Simple and Low Cost made a breakthrough with the success in bringing a decision on peace in industrial relations disputes in the past 4 years. The author is interested whether this Peace ruling does not contradict Article 4 of PERMA Number 1 of 2016 and does not confl ict with statutory regulations and has permanent legal force. The method used in this research is normative juridical analysis of facts that exist systematically. The results of the research and discussion showed that Article 4 of PERMA Number 1 of 2016 is doubly meaningful, so that the Peace Decision in the Padang District Court of Class IA is not in confl ict with the laws and regulations and has permanent legal force. The factors causing peace in the Padang Industrial Relations Court, namely Article 4 PERMA Number 1 of 2016 has a double meaning, so that the Padang Industrial Relations Court refers to Article 130 HIR, there is pressure on the bipartite process, mediation in the employment service is less than optimal, the parties those who disputed want peace to be carried out in the industrial relations court, the panel of judges considered that disputes were very possible to be carried out peacefully, and to reduce the accumulation of cases in the court.

scholarly journals Civil Procedure and Practice: Recent Developments

1992 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 1100
Author(s):  
Glen H. Poelman ◽  
Alan S. Rudakoff
Keyword(s):  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Environment ◽  
Going Concern ◽  
The Past ◽  
Recent Developments

An on-going concern for all lawyers is staying abreast of developments affecting the practice of law in their respective jurisdictions. Within this paper, the authors review Alberta Court decisions relating to civil procedure and synthesize them so as to give the reader an outline of the trends that have developed in Alberta civil procedure over the past two years. The authors effectively provide a sense of the current legal environment.

scholarly journals MEKANISME PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL PADA PENGADILAN NEGERI KLAS IA SAMARINDA

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 50
Author(s):  
Maryanto Maryanto ◽  
Wahyuni Safitri
Keyword(s):  
Social Life ◽  
Dispute Settlement ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Legal Entity ◽  
Operational Procedure ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Legal Standing ◽  
Operational Level ◽  
Legal Subjects

The relation between legal subjects such as person or legal entity in a case, frequently generates dispute. Along with the complexity of social life, then, the more parties are involved in the dispute, the wider scope of the dispute case. One of the concerned dispute in the society is Industrial Relations Disputes that become the competence of Industrial Relations Court. Since 2015, The Act No. 2/2004 about Industrial Relations Dispute Settlement has enforced effectively, it still has many weaknesses, wether from practical or regulation aspects. The legal problems of its Act cause the settlement of Industrial Relations Dispute become less effective and efficient, also hamper the principle of constante justitite (principle of rapid, fair and easy trial). The research concluded that the practical/operational level of the Judges Panel in examining and adjudicating the cases of Industrial Relations Dispute in Industrial Relations Court of Samarinda, which tend to apply the general civil procedure law, from the examination of legal standing of the parties, exception, interlocutory decision, replik, duplik, writen proof, the witnesses, experts/professional witnesses, conclusion and verdict. This procedures only prolong the examination and trial process to settle the case of Industrial Relations Dispute. Therefore, the SOP (Standard Operational Procedure) of the settlement of Industrial Relations Dispute cannot be well-implemented yet as the mandate of the law. 

scholarly journals Dismissal Cases 1990-1991

1970 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alan Geare
Keyword(s):  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Court Decisions

The paper considers a number of recent Court decisions related to dismissals, and in particular their impact on industrial relations practice

scholarly journals Urgency Application Of Proof Decisoir Eed Related With Judicial Conditions In The Civil Case Evidence In The Court (Case Study of Decision No. 47 / Pdt.G / 2012 / PN Lsk and Decision No. 16/Pdt.G/2012/PN Stb)

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-216
Author(s):  
Efa Laela Fakhriah ◽  
Yustika Tatar Fauzi Harahap
Keyword(s):  
Civil Law ◽  
Civil Procedure ◽  
Court Case ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Civil Case ◽  
Judicial Decisions ◽  
The Law

Abstract:Implementation of the law that related civil law to the procedure of settlement of the legal dispute in court is regulated by formal law that named law of civil procedure. The aim of this study to determine how the application of proof decisoir eed in Civil Case Evidence in Court? and how the factors that affect the consideration of the judge in deciding decisoir eed as evidence?. There are some references for this research, court decisions, both decisoir eed application by either party in order to convince the judge and decisoir eed as the only evidence of the evidentiary process. The results showed that contradictory opinions: 1. In practice there are judicial decisions that apply oath breaker even if the parties have filed written evidence and witnesses and 2. decisoir eed can be applied if one of the parties did not submit evidence. The next discussion is the existence of subjective factors and objective factors for the judge to consider the granting of the decisoir eed by the parties. The conclusion of this research is the application of the decisoir eed of the civil event is irrelevant because of the low sense of legal certainty.Keywords: Proof, Decisoir Eed, Judge Abstrak:Implementasi hukum yang berhubungan di bidang keperdataan terhadap tata cara penyelesaian sengketa hukum di pengadilan diatur oleh hukum formil yang disebut dengan hukum acara perdata. Penelitian ini bermaksud untuk mengetahui bagaimana penerapan alat bukti sumpah pemutus dalam pembuktian perkara perdata di Pengadilan dan bagaimana faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi terhadap keyakinan Hakim dalam memutuskan sumpah pemutus. Materi pembahasan penelitian ini adalah permohonan sumpah pemutus oleh salah satu pihak dengan tujuan untuk meyakinkan Hakim dalam menilai kebenaran alat bukti dan permohonan sumpah pemutus sebagai alat bukti satu-satunya dalam proses pembuktian. Hasil analisis menunjukan 2 (dua) pendapat saling kontradiktif yaitu dalam Putusan No. 47/Pdt.G/2012/PN Lsk Majelis Hakim yang mengabulkan permohonan sumpah pemutus oleh Penggugat meskipun Penggugat telah memiliki alat bukti lain dan dalam Putusan No. 16/Pdt.G/2012/PN Stb Majelis Hakim tidak mengabulkan permohonan sumpah pemutus dalam perkara tersebut karena Pihak Lawan memiliki bukti surat dan saksi. Pembahasan berikutnya sehubugan dengan faktor subyektif dan faktor obyektif dari Hakim dalam mempertimbangkan permohonan sumpah pemutus oleh para pihak. Kesimpulan yang didapat adalah penerapan alat bukti sumpah pemutus dalam acara perdata sudah tidak relevan karena jauh dari rasa kepastian hukum dan paradigma hukum yang berkembang dalam penanganan perkara perdata di samping mencari kebenaran formal mulai mengarah kepada terwujudnya kebenaran materiil terbatas. Hakim harus melakukan pencarian kebenaran terhadap fakta yang dipersengketakan demi terwujudnya keadilan dan kepastian hukum.Kata kunci: Alat Bukti, Sumpah Pemutus, Hakim

The Mexican Supreme Court and the Juntas de Conciliación y Arbitraje, 1917–1924: The Judicialisation of Labour Relations after the Revolution

2009 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 723-755 ◽  
Author(s):  
WILLIAM J. SUAREZ-POTTS
Keyword(s):  
Latin America ◽  
Supreme Court ◽  
Legal Status ◽  
Recent Trend ◽  
Industrial Relations ◽  
Case Law ◽  
Court Decisions ◽  
Legal Decisions ◽  
Constituent Part ◽  
Labour Relations

AbstractThis article reviews Mexican Supreme Court decisions concerning the legal status of juntas de conciliación y arbitraje (state labour boards of conciliation and arbitration) between 1917 and 1924. During this period the Court played an important role in legitimising these administrative boards, which have since become a constituent part of Mexico's state–labour regime. This examination of the Court's decisions shows how judge-made law contributed to the evolution of industrial relations in the country in the early 1920s. Furthermore, the article's discussion of the connection between the Court's evolving case law and its changing membership in this period indicates how its legal decisions were sensitive to political changes. This presents an early instance of the more recent trend toward the judicialisation of politics in Latin America.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document