scholarly journals Characteristics of patients who underwent lower limb amputation due to critical limb ischemia – one center experience

2016 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Andrzej Olech ◽  
Agnieszka Hamera ◽  
Karol Suppan ◽  
Wioletta Banaś ◽  
Liliana Wnęk ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 828-831
Author(s):  
S. Maruthu Thurai ◽  
◽  
P. Mohan Raja ◽  
M. Murali ◽  
◽  
...  

Introduction: Aim is to study the poor prognostic determinants for patients undergoing superficial femoral artery angioplasty . Material and Methods: It is a Prospective observational study done in fifty patients who has undergone superficial femoral artery angioplasty for lower limb ischemia. Results: 22% had reocclusion of lesion, 10% required reintervention and 8% underwent major limb amputation .These three were considered major negative impact conditions. These were found in majority of patients with renal insufficiency, critical limb ischemia, smoker and drug defaulters. Conclusion: Thus poor prognostic determinants in the study were renal insufficiency, critical limb ischemia , smoker and drug defaulters.


Perfusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 026765912110506
Author(s):  
Natasha Habr ◽  
Jamal J Hoballah ◽  
Jamil Borgi ◽  
Caroline Hamadi ◽  
Pierre Sfeir ◽  
...  

Lower limb amputation following arterial cannulation for VA-ECMO has been described in the literature. Limb ischemia however following venous cannulation is very rare and not quite understood. We present a case of limb ischemia following venous cannulation. A combination of venous congestion, compartment syndrome and subsequent arterial insufficiency is the proposed pathophysiology. Shock and use of vasopressors are compounding factors. Limb ischemia can be transient and reversible if diagnosed immediately and treated by early removal of the cannula. Our patient was unstable and ECMO dependent, and removal of the cannula was not an option. This resulted in limb loss and eventual above knee amputation. Use of the smallest appropriate venous cannula and early fasciotomy, in addition to hemodynamic optimization are measures that could help in preventing major amputation.


BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Gwilym ◽  
C Waldron ◽  
E Thomas-Jones ◽  
P Pallmann ◽  
R Preece ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Major Lower Limb Amputation (MLLA) is a life changing event with significant morbidity and mortality. Inaccurate risk prediction can lead to poor decision making, resulting in delay to definitive surgery, or undertaking amputation when not in the patient’s best interest. We aim to answer: In adult patients undergoing MLLA for chronic limb threatening ischaemia or diabetes, how accurately do health care professionals prospectively predict outcomes after MLLA, and how does this compare to existing prediction tools? Methods A multicentre prospective observational cohort study is being delivered through the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network. Dissemination was via an existing network of contacts and social media. Consecutive data will be collected for seven months from site launch date, including demographic data and pre-operative outcome predictions from surgeons, anaesthetists, and allied healthcare professionals. Follow-up data will comprise 30-day (mortality, morbidity, MLLA revision, surgical site infection, and blood transfusion) and 1-year (mortality, MLLA revision and ambulation). The accuracy of surgeons’ predictions will be evaluated and compared to pre-existing risk prediction scoring tools. Results PERCEIVE launched on 01/10/2020 with 23 centres (16 UK, 7 international) registered to collect data. 50 other centres (27 UK, 23 international) have expressed interest/are pursuing local audit/ethical approval. We aim to collect data on clinicians estimate of outcomes for over 500 patients. Discussion This study will utilise a trainee research network to provide data on the accuracy of healthcare professionals’ predictions of outcomes following MLLA and compare this to the utility of existing prediction tools in this patient cohort.


Spinal Cord ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 40 (4) ◽  
pp. 174-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
A Cavigelli ◽  
R Fischer ◽  
V Dietz

PLoS ONE ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e0170705 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael P. Dillon ◽  
Lauren V. Fortington ◽  
Muhammad Akram ◽  
Bircan Erbas ◽  
Friedbert Kohler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document