COMPREHENSIVE PROPERTY DETERMINATION FOR FIBER-REINFORCED POLYMER COMPOSITES IN EXTRUSION DEPOSITION ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING—BAYESIAN VS DETERMINISTIC This work introduces both deterministic and Bayesian methodologies to simultaneously determine the elastic constants of the constituent polymer and the fiber orientation state in a short fiber-reinforced polymer (SFRP) composite based on a small number of experimental measurements of the composite properties. The ability of the Bayesian approach to calibrate uncertainties makes it a promising tool for enabling a probabilistic framework for composites manufacturing digital twins. The two methods that enable the reverse engineering of the orientation of the fibers and the in-situ polymer properties are compared. For the extrusion deposition additive manufacturing (EDAM) process and other SFRP composites processes (e.g. injection molding), extensive characterization efforts are currently required to develop composites manufacturing digital twins. To circumvent the extensive characterization required, Digimat© provides a suite of tools to reverse engineer material properties of SFRPs. However, Digimat© lacks a methodology to inversely determine the fiber orientation state and the constituent polymer properties simultaneously. To that end, this work presents both a deterministic and hierarchical Bayesian approaches to determine the polymer properties and the fiber orientation state simultaneously. The results indicate that both approaches provide a reliable framework for the reverse engineering process. The deterministic approach provides a more rapid, point estimate methodology, whereas the Bayesian approach provides a more comprehensive methodology that includes uncertainties in the reverse engineering process. This work introduces both deterministic and Bayesian methodologies to simultaneously determine the elastic constants of the constituent polymer and the fiber orientation state in a short fiber-reinforced polymer (SFRP) composite based on a small number of experimental measurements of the composite properties. The ability of the Bayesian approach to calibrate uncertainties makes it a promising tool for enabling a probabilistic framework for composites manufacturing digital twins. The two methods that enable the reverse engineering of the orientation of the fibers and the in-situ polymer properties are compared. For the extrusion deposition additive manufacturing (EDAM) process and other SFRP composites processes (e.g. injection molding), extensive characterization efforts are currently required to develop composites manufacturing digital twins. To circumvent the extensive characterization required, Digimat© provides a suite of tools to reverse engineer material properties of SFRPs. However, Digimat© lacks a methodology to inversely determine the fiber orientation state and the constituent polymer properties simultaneously. To that end, this work presents both a deterministic and hierarchical Bayesian approaches to determine the polymer properties and the fiber orientation state simultaneously. The results indicate that both approaches provide a reliable framework for the reverse engineering process. The deterministic approach provides a more rapid, point estimate methodology, whereas the Bayesian approach provides a more comprehensive methodology that includes uncertainties in the reverse engineering process.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
AKSHAY J. THOMAS, ◽  
EDUARDO BAROCIO ◽  
ILIAS BILIONIS ◽  
R. BYRON PIPES

This work introduces both deterministic and Bayesian methodologies to simultaneously determine the elastic constants of the constituent polymer and the fiber orientation state in a short fiber-reinforced polymer (SFRP) composite based on a small number of experimental measurements of the composite properties. The ability of the Bayesian approach to calibrate uncertainties makes it a promising tool for enabling a probabilistic framework for composites manufacturing digital twins. The two methods that enable the reverse engineering of the orientation of the fibers and the in-situ polymer properties are compared. For the extrusion deposition additive manufacturing (EDAM) process and other SFRP composites processes (e.g. injection molding), extensive characterization efforts are currently required to develop composites manufacturing digital twins. To circumvent the extensive characterization required, Digimat© provides a suite of tools to reverse engineer material properties of SFRPs. However, Digimat© lacks a methodology to inversely determine the fiber orientation state and the constituent polymer properties simultaneously. To that end, this work presents both a deterministic and hierarchical Bayesian approaches to determine the polymer properties and the fiber orientation state simultaneously. The results indicate that both approaches provide a reliable framework for the reverse engineering process. The deterministic approach provides a more rapid, point estimate methodology, whereas the Bayesian approach provides a more comprehensive methodology that includes uncertainties in the reverse engineering process.

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 231-232
Author(s):  
Adnan Kastrati ◽  
Alexander Hapfelmeier

Author(s):  
Mark Snider ◽  
Sudhakar Teegavarapu ◽  
D. Scott Hesser ◽  
Joshua D. Summers

Reverse engineering has gained importance over the past few years due to an intense competitive market aiding in the survivability of a company. This paper examines the reverse engineering process and what, how, and why it can assist in making a better design. Two well known reverse engineering methodologies are explored, the first by Otto and Wood and the second by Ingle. Each methodology is compared and contrasted according to the protocols and tools used. Among some of the reverse engineering tools detailed and illustrated are: Black box, Fishbone, Function Structure, Bill of Material, Exploded CAD models, Morphological Matrix, Subtract and Operate Procedure (SOP), House of Quality matrix, and FMEA. Even though both methodologies have highly valued tools, some of the areas in reverse engineering need additional robust tooling. This paper presents new and expanded tooling to augment the existing methods in hopes of furthering the understanding of the product, and process. Tools like Reverse Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (RFMEA), Connectivity graphs, and inter-relation matrix increase the design efficiency, quality, and the understanding of the reverse engineering process. These tools have been employed in two industry projects and one demonstrative purpose for a Design for Manufacture Class. In both of these scenarios, industry and academic, the users found that the augmented tools were useful in capturing and revealing information not previously realized.


Author(s):  
Daiane Aparecida Zuanetti ◽  
Luis Aparecido Milan

In this paper, we propose a new Bayesian approach for QTL mapping of family data. The main purpose is to model a phenotype as a function of QTLs’ effects. The model considers the detailed familiar dependence and it does not rely on random effects. It combines the probability for Mendelian inheritance of parents’ genotype and the correlation between flanking markers and QTLs. This is an advance when compared with models which use only Mendelian segregation or only the correlation between markers and QTLs to estimate transmission probabilities. We use the Bayesian approach to estimate the number of QTLs, their location and the additive and dominance effects. We compare the performance of the proposed method with variance component and LASSO models using simulated and GAW17 data sets. Under tested conditions, the proposed method outperforms other methods in aspects such as estimating the number of QTLs, the accuracy of the QTLs’ position and the estimate of their effects. The results of the application of the proposed method to data sets exceeded all of our expectations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document