scholarly journals Surgical Comanagement by Hospitalists: Continued Improvement Over 5 Years

2020 ◽  
pp. 232-235
Author(s):  
Nidhi Rohatgi ◽  
Yingjie Weng ◽  
Neera Ahuja

Neurosurgery services in which the same Internal Medicine hospitalists are dedicated year round to each of these surgical services to proactively prevent and manage medical conditions. In this article, we evaluate if SCM was associated with continued improvement in patient outcomes between 2012 and 2018 in Orthopedic and Neurosurgery services at our institution. We conducted regression analysis on 26,380 discharges to assess yearly change in our outcomes. Since 2012, the odds of patients with ≥1 medical complication decreased by 3.8% per year (P = .01), the estimated length of stay decreased by 0.3 days per year (P < .0001), and the odds of rapid response team calls decreased by 12.2% per year (P = .001). Estimated average direct cost savings were $3,424 per discharge.

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kimberly Scherr ◽  
Donna M. Wilson ◽  
Joan Wagner ◽  
Maureen Haughian

Evidence is needed to validate rapid response teams (RRTs), including those led by nurse practitioners (NPs). A descriptive-comparative mixed-methods study was undertaken to evaluate a newly implemented NP-led RRT at 2 Canadian hospitals. On the basis of data gathered on 255 patients who received an RRT call compared with the patient data for the previous year, no significant differences in the number of cardiorespiratory arrests, unplanned intensive care unit admissions, and hospital mortality were found. In addition, no significant differences in patient outcomes were identified between the NP-led and intensivist physician-led RRT calls. A paper survey revealed that ward nurses had confidence in the knowledge and skills of the NP-led RRT and believed that patient outcomes were improved as a result of their RRT call. These findings indicate that NP-led RRTs are a safe and effective alternative to intensivist-led teams, but more research is needed to demonstrate that RRTs improve hospital care quality and patient outcomes.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 61-64 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankur Segon ◽  
Shahryar Ahmad ◽  
Yogita Segon ◽  
Vivek Kumar ◽  
Harvey Friedman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Rapid response teams have been adopted across hospitals to reduce the rate of inpatient cardiopulmonary arrest. Yet, data are not uniform on their effectiveness across university and community settings. Objective The objective of our study was to determine the impact of rapid response teams on patient outcomes in a community teaching hospital with 24/7 resident coverage. Methods Our retrospective chart review of preintervention-postintervention data included all patients admitted between January 2004 and April 2006. Rapid response teams were initiated in March 2005. The outcomes of interest were inpatient mortality, unexpected transfer to the intensive care unit, code blue (cardiac or pulmonary arrest) per 1000 discharges, and length of stay in the intensive care unit. Results Rapid response teams were activated 213 times during the intervention period. There was no statistically significant difference in inpatient mortality (3.13% preintervention versus 2.91% postintervention), code blue calls (3.09 versus 2.89 per 1000 discharges), or unexpected transfers of patients to the intensive care unit (15.8% versus 15.5%). Conclusions The implementation of a rapid response team did not appear to affect overall mortality and code blue calls in a community-based hospital with 24/7 resident coverage.


Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Dambrosio ◽  
Elizabeth Avis

Purpose: The Stroke Program manager (SPM) collaborated with the Rapid Response Team Nurses (RRTRN) to develop a facilitator process for patients in the intensive care units (ICU) presenting with stroke symptoms. The SPM developed a process to include activation of the Rapid Response Team (RRT) which included dedicated RRTRNs for all non-ICU stroke alerts (SA). This new SA improved care coordination, patient outcomes and improved the nurse work environment. The SPM identified the need for a similar SA process in the ICUs. Jointly, the SPM and RRTRNs developed a process to expand the RRTRN role to facilitate SAs in all ICUs. Methods: The SPM proposed involvement of the RRTRNs in the SA for ICU patients to the RRT Subcommittee with the support of nursing leadership. This new process would involve the RRTRN responding to all SA activations in the ICU. Care coordination shifted to a leadership couplet: the RRTRN and the ICURN. Implementation included specialized education orientation and scripted materials. The ICU RNs were educated on this unique process. This cutting edge process was incorporated into the RRT matrix to accommodate simultaneous RRT and SA alert activations. The RRTRNs provided efficient care coordination, dependable documentation, enhanced patient outcomes and support to the ICU RN. Evaluation: Utilizing RRTRNs as stroke facilitators bolstered the stroke alert process in the ICUS. When a patient exhibits sudden stroke like symptoms, the RRTRNs bring their expertise to the bedside, specifically by achieving the stroke metrics. ICU patients already have complex needs and the addition of a stroke complication is not a common occurrence. Creating this small group of “stroke experts” outside the ICU transferred easily into the ICU setting. Since its implementation, the facilitated 60 ICU SA focusing on the aspects of stroke care while the ICU nurse continues to maintain the critically ill patient. Implications for Practice: ICU are often very specialized in the care they deliver, but a stroke can traverse all of those specialties. Developing a small group of experts in stroke, provided consistency, support, and overall better care and outcomes for a patient when every moment counts. Utilizing the existing group of RRTRNs was fiscally sound as well as practical.


2009 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
BARBARA CHAMBERLAIN ◽  
KATHRYN DONLEY ◽  
JACQUELINE MADDISON

Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. 494-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahilan Sivaganesan ◽  
Clinton J Devin ◽  
Inamullah Khan ◽  
Panagiotis Kerezoudis ◽  
Hui Nian ◽  
...  

Abstract BACKGROUND Reducing length of stay (LOS) in a safe manner has the potential to save significant costs for the care of patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery. Due to the relative absence on weekends of staff required for discharging patients to rehabilitation or nursing facilities, we hypothesize that patients undergoing lumbar surgery later in the week have a longer LOS than their counterparts. OBJECTIVE To analyze the effect of day of the week for lumbar surgery on LOS. METHODS Patients undergoing surgery for lumbar degenerative disease were prospectively enrolled in the multicenter quality and outcomes database registry. A multivariable proportional odds regression model was built with LOS as the outcome of interest and patient and surgical variables as covariates. RESULTS A total of 11 897 patients were analyzed. Among those discharged home, the regression analysis demonstrated significantly higher odds of longer LOS for patients undergoing surgery on Friday as compared to Monday (P < .001). Among those discharged to a facility, there were significantly higher odds of longer LOS for patients undergoing surgery on Wednesday (P < .001), Thursday (P < .001), and Friday (P = .002) as compared to Monday. CONCLUSION The findings of this study suggest that lumbar patients undergoing fusions and those discharged to a facility have longer LOS when surgery is later in the week. Scheduling these patients for surgery earlier in the week and ensuring adequate resources for patient disposition on weekends may lead to LOS reduction and cost savings for hospitals, payers, and patients alike.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. e000815
Author(s):  
Kelly LoPresti ◽  
Julianne Camera ◽  
Elizabeth Barrett ◽  
Caroline Gosse ◽  
Donna Johnson ◽  
...  

BackgroundAs part of the scale-up of the Patient Care Collaborative (PCC) at our institution, we explored staff perceptions and patient outcomes at different levels of model implementation in three general internal medicine units.MethodsWe conducted a mixed-methods embedded experimental healthcare improvement initiative. In the qualitative strand, we conducted five focus group discussions. In the quantitative strand, we used hospital administrative data to compare outcomes (falls per 1000, median length of stay in days and resource use measured as resource intensity weights (RIW), before and after the implementation of the PCC, using χ2 tests, Wilcoxon’s rank sum tests and interrupted time series analyses.ResultsStaff showed considerable knowledge and acceptance of the PCC but expressed mixed feelings with regards to patient safety, workload, communication and teamwork. Staff perceptions varied by level of implementation of the PCC. A number of falls (overall) in the full implementation phase were not significantly different from the preimplementation phase (227 per 1000 vs 200 per 1000; p=0.449), but the number of moderate to severe falls dropped (12 vs 2 per 1000); p<0.001). Median length of stay (5 vs 6 days; p<0.001) and resource use were lower (0.1 vs 0.4; p<0.001) in the full implementation phase compared with the preimplementation phase. The trend analyses showed differences across units.ConclusionsThe PCC was moderately well adopted. Perceptions of the PCC among staff and patient outcomes are likely linked to the levels of implementation. The PCC resulted in improved safety, shorter hospital stays and lower costs of care.


2012 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brad W. Butcher ◽  
Eric Vittinghoff ◽  
Judith Maselli ◽  
Andrew D. Auerbach

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e052899
Author(s):  
Karen B Lasater ◽  
Linda H Aiken ◽  
Douglas Sloane ◽  
Rachel French ◽  
Brendan Martin ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo evaluate variation in Illinois hospital nurse staffing ratios and to determine whether higher nurse workloads are associated with mortality and length of stay for patients, and cost outcomes for hospitals.DesignCross-sectional analysis of multiple data sources including a 2020 survey of nurses linked to patient outcomes data.Setting: 87 acute care hospitals in Illinois.Participants210 493 Medicare patients, 65 years and older, who were hospitalised in a study hospital. 1391 registered nurses employed in direct patient care on a medical–surgical unit in a study hospital.Main outcome measuresPrimary outcomes were 30-day mortality and length of stay. Deaths avoided and cost savings to hospitals were predicted based on results from regression estimates if hospitals were to have staffed at a 4:1 ratio during the study period. Cost savings were computed from reductions in lengths of stay using cost-to-charge ratios.ResultsPatient-to-nurse staffing ratios on medical-surgical units ranged from 4.2 to 7.6 (mean=5.4; SD=0.7). After adjusting for hospital and patient characteristics, the odds of 30-day mortality for each patient increased by 16% for each additional patient in the average nurse’s workload (95% CI 1.04 to 1.28; p=0.006). The odds of staying in the hospital a day longer at all intervals increased by 5% for each additional patient in the nurse’s workload (95% CI 1.00 to 1.09, p=0.041). If study hospitals staffed at a 4:1 ratio during the 1-year study period, more than 1595 deaths would have been avoided and hospitals would have collectively saved over $117 million.ConclusionsPatient-to-nurse staffing ratios vary considerably across Illinois hospitals. If nurses in Illinois hospital medical–surgical units cared for no more than four patients each, thousands of deaths could be avoided, and patients would experience shorter lengths of stay, resulting in cost-savings for hospitals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document