In-hospital cardiac arrest epidemiology in a mature rapid response system

Background: Resuscitation guidelines have been improved every five years using ILCOR international consensus and outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest improved. However, it remained unknown whether the outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest has improved. The purpose of this research is to compare the outcomes of multicenter registrations in Japan and to consider the role of rapid response system (RRS). Methods: We compared the two multicenter prospective registrations for adult in-hospital cardiac arrest conducted in Japan. We compared the outcome of Japanese Registry of CPR (J-RCPR,12 hospitals) conducted in the "Guideline 2005" era and Japanese Registry for Survey Of in-hospital Resuscitation Trial (J-RESORT,8 hospitals) conducted in the "Guidelines 2010" era. We searched the number of hospitals participating in the rapid response system multicenter collaborative research (RRS) conducted in Japan. Results: J-RCPR had 491 cases, mean age 71 ± 15 years old, male 63%(311/491), J-RESORT 284 cases, mean age 72 ± 17 years old, male 68%(193/284). ROSC rate was 64.7% (318/491), 77.5% (220/284), respectively (p<0.05). The survival rate after 24 hours was 49.8% (245/491), 50.7% (144/284) (NS), the survival rate after 30 days was 27.8% (137/491), 33.1% (94/284) (NS), and the favorable neurological outcome rate (CPC 1 or CPC 2) was 21.4% (105/491), 22.9% (65/284) (NS), respectively. The proportion of witnessed cardiac arrest was 77.2% (379/491), 81.7% (232/284) (NS), the location of incidence in general wards was 54.0% (265/491), 46.1% (131/284) (NS), and the shockable rhythm was 28.1% (138/491), 22.5% (64/284) (NS), respectively. In both registries, the median interval from the occurrence of cardiac arrest to the initiation of resuscitation was 0 min. The proportion of participating hospitals to RRS was only 6 facilities in 2013 and increased to 41 facilities in 2016, but still less than 1% of the total number of hospitals in Japan. Conclusion: This study showed no improvement in the outcome of in-hospital cardiac arrest and very few hospitals using RRS during the past 10 years. To improve the outcome of the in-hospital cardiac arrest, it is necessary to investigate the nation-wide status of in-hospital cardiac arrest and the effectiveness of RRS.

Download Full-text

THE EFFICACY OF NATIONAL EARLY WARNING SIGN SCORE USED BY RAPID RESPONSE SYSTEM TO REDUCE SUDDEN CARDIAC ARREST

Respirology ◽

10.1111/resp.13700_372 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 24 (S2) ◽

pp. 212-213

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Early Warning ◽

Sudden Cardiac Arrest ◽

Rapid Response ◽

Warning Sign ◽

Rapid Response System ◽

Response System ◽

Early Warning Sign

Download Full-text

Outcomes following changing from a two-tiered to a three-tiered hospital rapid response system

Australian Health Review ◽

10.1071/ah17105 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 43 (2) ◽

pp. 178

Author(s):

The Concord Medical Emergency Team Study Investigators

Keyword(s):

Cardiac Arrest ◽

Hospital Mortality ◽

Patient Outcomes ◽

Medical Emergency Team ◽

Rapid Response ◽

Medical Emergency ◽

Rapid Response System ◽

Structured Interviews ◽

Emergency Team ◽

Response System

Objectives The aim of the present study was to determine whether changing a hospital rapid response system (RRS) from a two-tiered to a three-tiered model can reduce disruption to normal hospital routines while maintaining the same overall patient outcomes. Methods Staff at an Australian teaching hospital attending medical emergency team and cardiac arrest (MET/CA) calls were interviewed after the RRS was changed from a two-tiered to three-tiered model, and the results were compared with a study using the same methods conducted before the change. The main outcome measures were changes in: (1) the incident rate resulting from staff leaving normal duties to attend MET/CA calls; (2) the cardiac arrest rate, (3) unplanned intensive care unit (ICU) admission rates; and (4) hospital mortality. Results We completed 1337 structured interviews (overall response rate 65.2%). The rate of incidents occurring as a result of staff leaving normal duties to attend MET/CA calls fell from 213.7 to 161.3 incidents per 1000 MET/CA call participant attendances (P<0.001), but the rate of cardiac arrest and unplanned ICU admissions did not change significantly. Hospital mortality was confounded by the opening of a new palliative care ward. Conclusion A three-tiered RRS may reduce disruption to normal hospital routines while maintaining the same overall patient outcomes. What is known about the topic? RRS calls result in significant disruption to normal hospital routines because staff can be called away from normal duties to attend. The best staffing model for an RRS is currently unknown. What does this paper add? The present study demonstrates, for the first time, that changing a hospital RRS from a two-tiered to a three-tiered model can reduce the rate of incidents reported by staff caused by leaving normal duties to attend RRS calls while maintaining the same overall patient outcomes. What are the implications for practitioners? Hospitals could potentially reduce disruption to normal hospital routines, without compromising patient care, by changing to a three-tiered RRS.

Download Full-text