Benefit-Cost Analysis as a Net Present Value Problem

1986 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 85-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael W. Sherraden
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Benefit Cost

Evaluating Regulatory Impact Assessments in Education Policy

2018 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 335-353
Author(s):  
Clive R. Belfield ◽  
A. Brooks Bowden ◽  
Viviana Rodriguez
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Federal Government ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Social Benefit ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Regulatory Decision ◽  
Regulatory Impact ◽  
Benefit Cost

Benefit–cost analysis is an important part of regulatory decision-making, yet there are questions as to how often and how well it is performed. Here we examine 28 Regulatory Impact Assessments performed by the federal government on education regulations since 2006. We find many Regulatory Impact Assessments estimated costs, albeit using informal methods, but most failed to adequately report benefits. Also, most studies did not estimate net present value or clearly report methodological assumptions. In reviewing the relatively high quality studies we identified a number of discrepancies from best practice. Most importantly, few Regulatory Impact Assessments attempted a social benefit–cost analysis: Most examined “administrative burdens” from compliance with legislation. This alternative focus on administrative burdens has significant implications for economic evaluation in practice.

The Consent Justification for Benefit–Cost Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 319-340
Author(s):  
Richard O. Zerbe
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Economic Literature ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Benefit Cost

AbstractThis paper provides a Consent Justification for benefit–cost analysis (BCA). The Consent Justification is based on a tendency toward actual compensation. A substantial justification for using BCA as a tool is the actual Pareto test, called the Consent Justification, in combination with the net present value criterion for individual projects. The traditional justification, the potential compensation test (PCT), is unsatisfactory on several grounds. In addition, the PCT occupies the uneasy position of being the source of extended criticisms in the economic literature and especially in the legal and philosophy literature. The argument for the Consent Justification lies not only in the deficiencies of the PCT, but also, especially, in a showing through simulation that all tend to gain across a portfolio of projects which is not large but rather robust with respect to errors and assumptions.

The Benefit-Cost Analysis on Construction Project Feasibility

2013 ◽  
Vol 357-360 ◽  
pp. 2312-2315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yan Ting Ma ◽  
Chun Jie Ma
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Construction Project ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Internal Rate Of Return ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Financial Evaluation ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Benefit Cost

Through the concept of benefit-cost and the comparison with financial evaluation, this article expounds the method and applicability of benefit-cost analysis, and gives three indicators which are economic internal rate of return (EIRR), economic net present value (ENPV) and benefit-cost ratio (RBC) to analyze the feasibility of construction project.

A Social Benefit Cost Analysis of Special Economic Zones in India: A Study of Noida SEZ

2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (1-2) ◽  
pp. 139-153
Author(s):  
Babita ◽  
N. K. Bishnoi
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Social Benefit ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Special Economic Zones ◽  
Positive Role ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Indian Economy ◽  
Benefit Cost ◽  
Economic Zones

Special economic zones (SEZs) in India have been in news due to their usefulness vis-à-vis adverse effects on economy. A good number of opponents opine that costs incurred by SEZs outweigh the benefits. However, it cannot be denied that SEZs have played a positive role in the welfare of the economy. Thus, to examine this issue, we carried out a social benefit–cost analysis (SBCA) on Noida Special Economic Zone (NSEZ) within the context of enclave model for the period of 2009–2016. The result shows the positive net present value and benefit–cost ratio greater than one under methodological assumptions. This infers that NSEZ is contributing towards the welfare of Indian economy. One interesting findings of the study is that NSEZ is generating positive gains to economy with the absence of various market distortions which could otherwise reduce the realised benefits. Hence, need arises to eliminate such distortions from outside area of economy also to make it competitive at global level. Therefore, it can be concluded that competitiveness of the Indian economy can be enhanced with the removal of market distortions and liberalisation of rules, regulation and policies for economic development activities. Hence, the Government of India should emphasise and make regulations and policies that encourage competitiveness of the industries. JEL Classification: D04, D61, F13, H2, J01

scholarly journals Benefit-Cost Analysis of Environmental Projects: A Plethora of Biases Understating Net Benefits

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 1-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip E. Graves
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Environmental Policies ◽  
The United States ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Marginal Costs ◽  
Big Picture ◽  
Technical Details ◽  
Benefit Cost ◽  
Proper Science

There are many reasons to suspect that benefit-cost analysis applied to environmental policies will result in policy decisions that will reject those environmental policies. The important question, of course, is whether those rejections are based on proper science. The present paper explores sources of bias in the methods used to evaluate environmental policy in the United States, although most of the arguments translate immediately to decision-making in other countries. There are some “big picture” considerations that have gone unrecognized, and there are numerous more minor, yet cumulatively important, technical details that point to potentially large biases against acceptance on benefit-cost grounds of environmental policies that have true marginal benefits greater than true marginal costs, both in net present value terms. It is hoped that the issues raised here will improve future conduct of benefit-cost analyses of environmental policies.

Benefit-Cost Analysis of the Perry Preschool Program and Its Policy Implications

1985 ◽  
Vol 7 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Steven Barnett
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Preschool Education ◽  
Economic Benefits ◽  
Policy Implications ◽  
Social Investment ◽  
Preschool Program ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Cost Reductions ◽  
Benefit Cost

Benefit-cost analysis is applied to the Perry Preschool Program and its long-term follow-up in order to examine preschool education as a social investment. Economic values are estimated for program cost, child care provided, later education cost reductions, increased higher education cost, delinquency and crime cost reductions, earnings increases, and welfare cost reductions. The net present value of benefits and costs is positive, indicating that the program was a profitable social investment. Analysis of the distribution of effects revealed that taxpayers obtained most of the economic benefits and that their benefits exceeded costs. Generalizability of the findings and their implications for public policy are examined.

Measures of Project Worth

2018 ◽  
pp. 137-155
Keyword(s):  
Net Present Value ◽  
Average Rate ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Capital Budgeting ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
Fixed Assets ◽  
Benefit Cost ◽  
Production Period

Investments usually involve the procurement of assets for which using marginal analysis may not be adequate in evaluating their worth to an economic activity in an enterprise. Furthermore, all the costs involved in the purchase of fixed assets are not ordinarily charged to the account of a production period. It is against his background that this chapter focuses on the concept of measures of project worth with a view to enabling farmers to obviate related problems in capital budgeting, non-discounted measures of project worth (pay-back period, average rate of return), discounted measures of project worth, benefit-cost analysis, net present value, decision criteria in using the net present value, internal rate of return, calculating the IRR, and interpreting the IRR. Discussions were based on a review of related and relevant literature. Conclusions and recommendations are made based on the discussions.

scholarly journals ANALISIS INVESTASI USAHATANI KEDELAI VARIETAS TANGGAMUS DI KABUPATEN GORONTALO

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Zulkifli Mantau
Keyword(s):  
Cost Analysis ◽  
Net Present Value ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Observation Data ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Benefit Cost Analysis ◽  
High Productivity ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Benefit Cost

The increase of soybeans  world price was causing of a domino effect for the Indonesian’s soybeans. Meanwhile, soybean productivity at the farm level is still low ( 1.3 t / ha ) with a range from 0.6 to 2.0 t / ha. In additional, the production technology can able to result of 1.7 to 3.2 t / ha . To solve these problems, It needs to planted the soybean that have a high productivity and efficient technically and economically.  The aims of this research are to find the investement feasibility of soybean farming (Tanggamus var.) at Puncak Village, Gorontalo District with benefit cost analysis approach (3 years projection). This research conducted at Puncak Village, Pulubala sub district, Gorontalo District. The datas was a primary observation data in the field, especially the data of soybeans farming activities for 2 seasons (1 year).  Analysis method use a benefit cost analysis. The analysis use a financial price (actual price) in the cost factors. The result showed that Net Present Value (NPV) (12%) Rp 10 269 643, Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 97.21%, Net Benefit Cost ratio (Net B/C) 2.64 and Payback periodh (PBP) 9 months or 0.7 year or 2 planted seasons.

EVALUASI TERHADAP PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH DALAM MENINGKATKAN PELAYANAN ASET DI KOTA PEMATANGSIANTAR

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 240
Author(s):  
Novdin M Sianturi
Keyword(s):  
Net Present Value ◽  
Payback Period ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Cost Ratio ◽  
Internal Rate Of Return ◽  
Present Value ◽  
Benefit Cost Ratio ◽  
Internal Rate ◽  
Benefit Cost

Abstrak: Pengelolaan sampah di Kota Pematangsiantar masih bertumpu pada pendekatan akhir (kumpul-angkut-buang), dengan tingkat pelayanan yang rendah, sehingga untuk meningkatkan pelayanan sampah, perlu dilakukan pemilahan di tempat penampungan sementara (TPS). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji sistem pengelolaan sampah dengan melakukan pemilihan di TPS dapat meningkatkan pelayanan aset persampahan sampai tahun  2015 secara teknis operasional dan dari aspek keuangan. Analisa teknis operasional aset pengelolaan sampah mulai dari pewadahan, pengumpulan dan pengangkutan sedangkan analisa keuangan dan analisa kelayakan menggunakan Net Present Value, Internal Rate of Return, Benefit/Cost Ratio, dan Payback Period. Dari hasil analisa tersebut diperoleh suatu sistem pengelolaan sampah dengan pemilihan di TPS berdasarkan zona pelayanan dengan skala prioritas secara bertahap daritahun 2013-2017, dapat meningkatkan cakupan pelayanan sampah eksisting rata-rata 6,69 %, cakupan pelayanan TPS eksisting rata-rata 8,29 %, dan cakupan pelayanan truk pengangkut sampah eksisting rata-rata 12,03 %. Investasinya layak, diperoleh Net Cashflow pada tahun 2020 sebesar Rp 1.720.242.284,-, NPV suku bunga 15 % bernilai positif, IRR > MARR 15 %,  B/C Ratio > 1, dan PP 4,7 tahun, lebih pendek dari periode investasi 10 tahun. Dari Metode penelitian ini maka pengumpulan data, observasi lapangan dan pengukuran contoh timbulan sampah dengan sampel 4 TPS perumahan yang terlayani pengangkutan.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document