Investigation of painful joint arthroplasty

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. 5-11
Author(s):  
Vivek Sharma ◽  
Tom Turmezei ◽  
John Wain ◽  
Iain McNamara
2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 1083-1086.e1 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ran Schwarzkopf ◽  
Duy L. Phan ◽  
Melinda Hoang ◽  
Steven D.K. Ross ◽  
Dana Mukamel

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Xiang Wu ◽  
Jiang Hui Qing ◽  
Yao Yao ◽  
Dong Yang Chen ◽  
Qing Jiang

Abstract Purpose To compare the specificity and sensitivity of preoperative D-dimer and age-adjusted D-dimer value for predicting the incidence of the DVT preoperatively in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) patients. Methods We enrolled 406 patients finally above 50 years old. Everyone had done ultrasonography bedside, and D-dimer concentrations were collected before surgery. The D-dimer and age-adjusted D-dimer cut-off was calculated by multiple logistic regression and receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses. Results A total of 39 patients had found asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) by ultrasonography. The age (odds ratio [OR] 1.067; p = 0.003) and D-dimer (OR 1.331; p = 0.025) were related to the existence of DVT. For conventional D-dimer and age-adjusted D-dimer value, the area under the curves (AUCs) were 0.685 (0.499–0.696) and 0.795 (0.611–0.881), respectively. Conclusion Compared to traditional D-dimer, age-adjusted D-dimer showed better performance in screening DVT, which was useful clinically.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document