A Comparison of AVO Behavior after Prestack Time Migration, Prestack Depth Migration, and Prestack Imaging: ABSTRACT

AAPG Bulletin ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Allen, Carolyn Peddy, Anat Ca
Geophysics ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (2) ◽  
pp. 568-576 ◽  
Author(s):  
Young C. Kim ◽  
Worth B. Hurt, ◽  
Louis J. Maher ◽  
Patrick J. Starich

The transformation of surface seismic data into a subsurface image can be separated into two components—focusing and positioning. Focusing is associated with ensuring the data from different offsets are contributing constructively to the same event. Positioning involves the transformation of the focused events into a depth image consistent with a given velocity model. In prestack depth migration, both of these operations are achieved simultaneously; however, for 3-D data, the cost is significant. Prestack time migration is much more economical and focuses events well even in the presence of moderate velocity variations, but suffers from mispositioning problems. Hybrid migration is a cost‐effective depth‐imaging approach that uses prestack time migration for focusing; inverse migration for the removal of positioning errors; and poststack depth migration for proper positioning. When lateral velocity changes are moderate, the hybrid technique can generate a depth image that is consistent with a velocity field. For very complex structures that require prestack depth migration, the results of the hybrid technique can be used to create a starting velocity model, thereby reducing the number of iterations for velocity model building.


Geophysics ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. VE243-VE254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xianhuai Zhu ◽  
Paul Valasek ◽  
Baishali Roy ◽  
Simon Shaw ◽  
Jack Howell ◽  
...  

Recent applications of 2D and 3D turning-ray tomography show that near-surface velocities are important for structural imaging and reservoir characterization. For structural imaging, we used turning-ray tomography to estimate the near-surface velocities for static corrections followed by prestack time migration and the near-surface velocities for prestack depth migration. Two-dimensional acoustic finite-difference modeling illustrates that wave-equation prestack depth migration is very sensitive to the near-surface velocities. Field data demonstrate that turning-ray tomography followed by prestack time migration helps to produce superior images in complex geologic settings. When the near-surface velocity model is integrated into a background velocity model for prestack depth migration, we find that wave propagation is very sensitive to the velocities immediately below the topography. For shallow-reservoir characterization, we developed and applied azimuthal turning-ray tomography to investigate observed apparent azimuthal-traveltime variations, using a wide-azimuth land seismic survey from a heavy-oil field at Surmont, Canada. We found that the apparent azimuthal velocity variations are not necessarily related to azimuthal anisotropy, or horizontal transverse isotropy (HTI), induced by the stress field or fractures. Near-surface heterogeneity and the acquisition footprint also could result in apparent azimuthal variations.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-26
Author(s):  
Iyod Suherman ◽  
Taufan Wiguna ◽  
Rahadian Rahadian ◽  
Djunaedi Muljawan ◽  
Omar Moefti

The quality of seismic is important for interpretation. Prestack Depth Migration produce better quality of seismic imaging. The seismic generated through PSDM method has better seismic reflector and geological structure appearance compared to Prestack Time Migration (PSTM) method. Accurate interval velocity modeling is a key in PSDM process, involving dix transformation, coherency inversion, and tomography. Comparison between PSTM and PSDM show that PSDM offer better imaging for interpretation because PSDM has better seismic reflector continuity and good geological appearance.


Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (1) ◽  
pp. 246-255 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oong K. Youn ◽  
Hua‐wei Zhou

Depth imaging with multiples is a prestack depth migration method that uses multiples as the signal for more accurate boundary mapping and amplitude recovery. The idea is partially related to model‐based multiple‐suppression techniques and reverse‐time depth migration. Conventional reverse‐time migration uses the two‐way wave equation for the backward wave propagation of recorded seismic traces and ray tracing or the eikonal equation for the forward traveltime computation (the excitation‐time imaging principle). Consequently, reverse‐time migration differs little from most other one‐way wave equation or ray‐tracing migration methods which expect only primary reflection events. Because it is almost impossible to attenuate multiples without degrading primaries, there has been a compelling need to devise a tool to use multiples constructively in data processing rather than attempting to destroy them. Furthermore, multiples and other nonreflecting wave types can enhance boundary imaging and amplitude recovery if a full two‐way wave equation is used for migration. The new approach solves the two‐way wave equation for both forward and backward directions of wave propagation using a finite‐difference technique. Thus, it handles all types of acoustic waves such as reflection (primary and multiples), refraction, diffraction, transmission, and any combination of these waves. During the imaging process, all these different types of wavefields collapse at the boundaries where they are generated or altered. The process goes through four main steps. First, a source function (wavelet) marches forward using the full two‐way scalar wave equation from a source location toward all directions. Second, the recorded traces in a shot gather march backward using the full two‐way scalar wave equation from all receiver points in the gather toward all directions. Third, the two forward‐ and backward‐propagated wavefields are correlated and summed for all time indices. And fourth, a Laplacian image reconstruction operator is applied to the correlated image frame. This technique can be applied to all types of seismic data: surface seismic, vertical seismic profile (VSP), crosswell seismic, vertical cable seismic, ocean‐bottom cable (OBC) seismic, etc. Because it migrates all wave types, the input data require no or minimal preprocessing (demultiple should not be done, but near‐surface or acquisition‐related problems might need to be corrected). Hence, it is only a one‐step process from the raw field gathers to a final depth image. External noise in the raw data will not correlate with the forward wavefield except for some coincidental matching; therefore, it is usually unnecessary to do signal enhancement processing before the depth imaging with multiples. The input velocity model could be acquired from various methods such as iterative focusing analysis or tomography, as in other prestack depth migration methods. The new method has been applied to data sets from a simple multiple‐generating model, the Marmousi model, and a real offset VSP. The results show accurate imaging of primaries and multiples with overall significant improvements over conventionally imaged sections.


Geophysics ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 60 (6) ◽  
pp. 1947-1947 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur E. Barnes

I appreciate the thoughtful and thorough response given by Tygel et al. They point out that even for a single dipping reflector imaged by a single non‐zero offset raypath, pulse distortion caused by “standard processing” (NM0 correction‐CMP sort‐stack‐time migration) and pulse distortion caused by prestack depth migration are not really the same, because the reflecting point is mispositioned in standard processing. Within a CMP gather, this mispositioning increases with offset, giving rise to “CMP smear.” CMP smear degrades the stack, introducing additional pulse distortion. Where i‐t is significant, and where lateral velocity variations or reflection curvature are large, such as for complex geology, the pulse distortion of standard processing can differ greatly from that of prestack depth migration.


Geophysics ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 77 (3) ◽  
pp. S73-S82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sergius Dell ◽  
Dirk Gajewski ◽  
Claudia Vanelle

Time migration is an attractive tool to produce a subsurface image because it is faster and less sensitive to velocities errors than depth migration. However, a highly focused time image is only achievable with well-determined time-migration velocities. Therefore, a refinement of the initial time-migration velocities often is required. We introduced a new technique for prestack time migration, based on the common-migrated-reflector-element stack of common scatterpoint gathers, including an automatic update of time-migration velocities. The common scatterpoint gathers are generated using a new formulation of the double-square-root equation that is parametrized with the common-offset apex time. The common-migrated-reflector-element stack is a multiparameter stacking technique based on the Taylor expansion of traveltimes of time-migrated reflections in the paraxial vicinity of the image ray. Our 2D synthetic and field data examples demonstrated that the proposed method provides updated time-migration velocities that are more robust and have higher resolution compared with the initial time-migration velocities. The prestack time migration method also showed a clear improvement of the focusing of reflections for such geologic features as faults and salt structures.


Geophysics ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (3) ◽  
pp. S155-S166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Feng Deng ◽  
George A. McMechan

Most current true-amplitude migrations correct only for geometric spreading. We present a new prestack depth-migration method that uses the framework of reverse-time migration to compensate for geometric spreading, intrinsic [Formula: see text] losses, and transmission losses. Geometric spreading is implicitly compensated by full two-way wave propagation. Intrinsic [Formula: see text] losses are handled by including a [Formula: see text]-dependent term in the wave equation. Transmission losses are compensated based on an estimation of angle-dependent reflectivity using a two-pass recursive reverse-time prestack migration. The image condition used is the ratio of receiver/source wavefield amplitudes. Two-dimensional tests using synthetic data for a dipping-layer model and a salt model show that loss-compensating prestack depth migration can produce reliable angle-dependent reflection coefficients at the target. The reflection coefficient curves are fitted to give least-squares estimates of the velocity ratio at the target. The main new result is a procedure for transmission compensation when extrapolating the receiver wavefield. There are still a number of limitations (e.g., we use only scalar extrapolation for illustration), but these limitations are now better defined.


Geophysics ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 1052-1059 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard S. Lu ◽  
Dennis E. Willen ◽  
Ian A. Watson

The large velocity contrast between salt and the surrounding sediments generates strong conversions between P‐ and S‐wave energy. The resulting converted events can be noise on P‐wave migrated images and should be identified and removed to facilitate interpretation. On the other hand, they can also be used to image a salt body and its adjacent sediments when the P‐wave image is inadequate. The converted waves with smaller reflection and transmission angles and much larger critical angles generate substantially different illumination than does the P‐wave. In areas where time migration is valid, the ratio between salt thickness in time and the time interval between the P‐wave and the converted‐wave salt base on a time‐migrated image is about 2.6 or 1.3, depending upon whether the seismic wave propagates along one or both of the downgoing and upcoming raypaths in salt as the S‐wave, respectively. These ratios can be used together with forward seismic modeling and 2D prestack depth migration to identify the converted‐wave base‐of‐salt (BOS) events in time and depth and to correctly interpret the subsalt sediments. It is possible to mute converted‐wave events from prestack traces according to their computed arrival times. Prestack depth migration of the muted data extends the updip continuation of subsalt sedimentary beds, and improves the salt–sediment terminations in the P‐wave image. Prestack and poststack depth‐migrated examples illustrate that the P‐wave and the three modes of converted waves preferentially image different parts of the base of salt. In some areas, the P‐wave BOS can be very weak, obscured by noise, or completely absent. Converted‐wave imaging complements P‐wave imaging in delineating the BOS for velocity model building.


Geophysics ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. B175-B181 ◽  
Author(s):  
John H. Bradford ◽  
Lee M. Liberty ◽  
Mitch W. Lyle ◽  
William P. Clement ◽  
Scott Hess

Prestack depth migration (PSDM) analysis has the potential to significantly improve the accuracy of both shallow seismic reflection images and the measured velocity distributions. In a study designed to image faults in the Alvord Basin, Oregon, at depths from [Formula: see text], PSDM produced a detailed reflection image over the full target depth range. In contrast, poststack time migration produced significant migration artifacts in the upper [Formula: see text] that obscured reflection events and limited the structural interpretation in the shallow section. Additionally, an abrupt increase from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] in the PSDM velocity model constrained the interpretation of the transition from sedimentary basin fill to basement volcanic rocks. PSDM analysis revealed a complex extensional history with at least two distinct phases of basin growth and a midbasin basement high that forms the division between two major basin compartments.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document