scholarly journals Effects of Therapeutic Exercise on Hip Joint Range of Motion, Manual Muscle Test, Functional Movement Screen and Radiological Evaluation in a Youth Football Player with Football-specific Anterior Pelvic Tilt: A Case Report

2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 85-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dong-Hun Yu ◽  
Sang-Won Seo ◽  
Ho-Seong Lee
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Tilt ◽  
Football Player ◽  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Therapeutic Exercise ◽  
Manual Muscle Test ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
Youth Football ◽  
Anterior Pelvic Tilt ◽  
Joint Range

scholarly journals Functional Movement Screen task scores and joint range-of-motion: a construct validity study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar A Hincapié ◽  
George A Tomlinson ◽  
Malinda Hapuarachchi ◽  
Tatjana Stankovic ◽  
Steven Hirsch ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Construct Validity ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Student Athletes ◽  
Ankle Dorsiflexion ◽  
Ice Hockey ◽  
Validity Study ◽  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
Joint Range

Little is known about the construct validity of the Functional Movement Screen (FMS). We aimed to assess associations between FMS task scores and measures of maximum joint range-of-motion (ROM) among university varsity student-athletes from 4 sports (volleyball, basketball, ice hockey, and soccer). Athletes performed FMS tasks and had their maximum ankle, hip and shoulder ROM measured. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate associations between FMS task scores and ROM measurements. 101 university student-athletes were recruited (52 W/49 M; mean age 20.4±1.9 years). In general, athletes with higher FMS task scores had greater ROM compared to those with lower task scores. For example, athletes who scored 2 on the FMS squat task had 4˚ (95% CI, 1˚ to 7˚) more uni-articular ankle dorsiflexion ROM compared with those who scored 1, while those who scored 3 on the FMS squat task had 10˚ (4˚ to 17˚) more uni-articular ankle dorsiflexion ROM compared with those who scored 1. Large variation in ROM measurements was observed. In sum, substantial overlap in joint ROM between groups of athletes with different FMS task scores weakens the construct validity of the FMS as an indicator of specific joint ROM.

Comparison of Barefoot Walking and Shod Walking Between Children with and Without Flat Feet

2015 ◽  
Vol 105 (3) ◽  
pp. 218-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiann-Perng Chen ◽  
Meng-Jung Chung ◽  
Chao-Yin Wu ◽  
Kai-Wen Cheng ◽  
Mao-Jiun Wang
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Pelvic Tilt ◽  
Reaction Force ◽  
Ankle Dorsiflexion ◽  
Heel Strike ◽  
Shoe Condition ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
Flat Feet ◽  
Hip Flexion ◽  
Joint Range

Background We sought to investigate the effect of wearing shoes on joint range of motion, ground reaction force (GRF), and muscle activity (electromyography) in children with flat and normal feet during walking. Methods Nine children with flat feet and 12 children with normal feet aged 5 to 11 years were recruited. Each child was instructed to walk on a walkway in the barefoot and shod conditions. Joint range of motion, GRF, and electromyographic data within one gait cycle were collected simultaneously. Two-way analysis of variance was performed to evaluate the effects of foot type and shoe condition on the response measures. Results Children with flat feet had greater joint motion and higher muscle activities in the lower extremity, as well as lower vertical GRF and longer duration of the first peak forces in vertical and mediolateral GRFs than children with normal feet while walking. Compared with the barefoot condition, shoe wearing in both groups of children showed an increase in ankle dorsiflexion at heel strike, a decrease in anteroposterior GRF and its duration, and an increase in leg muscle electromyographic activities. Pelvic tilt range of motion was affected by the interaction of foot type and shoe condition. Conclusions Gait performance in pelvic tilt, hip flexion, and ankle dorsiflexion were different between the two groups of children. Wearing shoes increased the muscle activities of the shin. This finding can provide important information for clinical assessment of and shoe design for children with flat feet.

scholarly journals Pragmatic posterior capsular stretch and its effects on shoulder joint range of motion

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e000805
Author(s):  
Keramat Ullah Keramat ◽  
Muhammad Naveed Babur
Keyword(s):  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Shoulder Joint ◽  
Healthy Subjects ◽  
External Rotation ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Movement Screening ◽  
Joint Range

ObjectiveTo evaluate the immediate effects of pragmatic posterior capsular stretch (PPCS) on shoulder joint range of motion (ROM).MethodA quasi-experimental design was used to recruit healthy subjects of age 21.43 (±1.960) years, height 165.8 (±2.1069) cm and weight 63.90 (±13.187) kg. Inclusion criteria were grade 1 and grade 2 of the shoulder mobility test of functional movement screening. Preintervention and postintervention measurement of flexion, abduction, internal rotation (IR), external rotation (ER), reaching up behind the back (RUBTB) and reaching down behind the neck (RDBTN) were compared. A therapist-administered PPCS was the only intervention applied.ResultsPaired t-test statistics showed improvement (mean°±SD) in shoulder flexion (13.5°±8.11), abduction (11°±8.35), IR (8.5°±10.27), ER (7.83°±7.15), RUBTB (17.34°±13.81) inches and RDBTN (2.93±1.52) inches. The changes in these ROM and functional movements were statistically significant (p<0.05).ConclusionPPCS can effectively improve the functional movement of RUBTB and shoulder ROM in healthy subjects. It is recommended for the trials on prevention and rehabilitation of shoulder pathologies.Trial registration numberNCT04242888.

scholarly journals Assessing Movement Quality in Youth Footballers: The Relationship between Hip and Lower Limb Movement Screen and Functional Movement Screen

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (19) ◽  
pp. 9298
Author(s):  
Pawel Linek ◽  
Paul E. Muckelt ◽  
Damian Sikora ◽  
Nadine Booysen ◽  
Maria Stokes
Keyword(s):  
Lower Limb ◽  
Limb Movement ◽  
Screening Tools ◽  
Football Players ◽  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Functional Movement ◽  
Youth Football ◽  
Lower Limb Movement ◽  
Deep Squat ◽  
The Relationship

The Hip and Lower Limb Movement Screen (HLLMS) was developed to detect altered movement patterns and asymmetry specifically related to hip, pelvic, and lower limb movement control, as the other tools, such as the Functional Movement Screen (FMS), lacked focus on the hip and pelvic area. Both screening tools contain symmetrical and asymmetrical motor tasks which are based on observation of different aspects of each task performance. One motor task is in both screening tools. Therefore, they have some common features. The present study aimed to assess the relationship between the HLLMS and FMS performance in youth football players. The study included 41 elite male football (soccer) players (age: 15.6 ± 0.50 years), and the HLLMS and FMS scores were analyzed by assessing Spearman’s rank correlation. The FMS total score and the FMSMOVE were moderately correlated with the HLLMS total score (R = −0.54; −0.53, respectively). The FMS rotatory stability task was moderately correlated with the HLLMS small knee bend with the trunk rotation task (R = −0.50). The FMS deep squat task was moderately correlated with the HLLMS deep squat task (R = −0.46). The FMS hurdle step was weakly correlated with two of the HLLMS tasks: standing hip flexion (R = −0.37) and hip abduction with external rotation (R = −0.34). There were no other relationships found (p > 0.05). Out of the seven FMS tasks, only one asymmetrical (trunk rotary stability) and one symmetrical (deep squat) task were moderately related to the newly developed HLLMS tool contributing moderate relationship between the FMS total score and the HLLMS total score. Other FMS tasks were weakly or unrelated with the HLLMS. These findings indicate that these two screening tools mainly assess different aspects of movement quality in healthy youth football players.

Effect of Active Corrective Exercise on Spine Deformation and Functional Movement Screen in Elementary School Student

2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 1367-1376
Author(s):  
Da-Jeong Seok ◽  
Pil-Ha Hwang ◽  
Gi-Duck Park ◽  
Dong-Hun Seong ◽  
Seong-Deok Yoon
Keyword(s):  
Elementary School ◽  
Functional Movement Screen ◽  
Elementary School Student ◽  
Functional Movement

Arthroscopy in Arthrosis: Is It Worth it? A case Presentation

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (8) ◽  
pp. 2232-2235
Author(s):  
Marius Moga ◽  
Mark Edward Pogarasteanu ◽  
Antoine Edu
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Status ◽  
Loose Body ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
The Other ◽  
Joint Range Of Motion ◽  
Objective Evidence ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Total Knee ◽  
Joint Range

The role of arthroscopy in incipient and mild arthrosis, even combined with proximal tibial ostetomy, is well known and well documented. On the other hand, its role in the treatment of advanced arthrosis of the large joints, especially the knee, is a subject of controversy. The proponents of the use of arthroscopy in advanced arthrosis claim that meniscectomy, synovectomy, ostophytectomy, chondral lesion stabilization, arthroscopic release, plica and loose body removal greatly improve the quality of life for most patients, especially if followed by the use of viscoelastic injection, by diminishing pain and improving joint range of motion. The opponents claim that, even though the advantages are clear in the cases that refuse arthroplasty, in all the other cases the surgical indication should be total knee arthroplasty, as the clinical relief is temporary, but with all the risks of a surgical intervention. We have conducted an overview of the recent literature, in order to find objective evidence to sustain either point of view. We focused on articles published that included an objective measurement of before and after clinical status through clinical scores and objective measurements. We also focused on the follow-up period and on the evolution of the pathology after arthroscopy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document