scholarly journals Limited preoperative physical capacity continues to be associated with poor postoperative outcomes within a colorectal ERAS programme

2019 ◽  
Vol 101 (4) ◽  
pp. 261-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
E McLennan ◽  
R Oliphant ◽  
SJ Moug
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Lifestyle Factors ◽  
Physical Capacity ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery

Aim Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes aim to standardise perioperative care leading to optimal patient outcomes. Despite these programmes, variation in outcomes still persists. This study aimed to assess the influence of lifestyle factors on short-term outcomes after colorectal surgery within this optimal recovery programme. Methods Consecutive patients enrolled on an ERAS pathway who underwent elective colorectal surgery (June 2013 to July 2014) at one site were included. We used data routinely collected by ERAS nurse specialists and during preassessment to analyse association between patient and lifestyle factors and likelihood of developing postoperative complications or having an increased length of stay. Results A total of 199 patients were included: mean age 61.8 years (range 17–90 years) and 53.8% male. Age, sex, deprivation, smoking status, alcohol intake, body mass index or level of comorbidity were not associated with postoperative complications. Patients reporting limited preoperative physical capacity (unable to climb two flights of stairs) were more than four times as likely to have a postoperative complication on univariate analysis and were found to still have increased risk of postoperative complications on multivariate analysis. Patients reporting limited preoperative physical capacity were shown to have significantly longer hospital stay on univariate analysis. In the multivariate analysis, limited physical capacity was not associated with prolonged length of stay due to confounding factors of age and deprivation. Conclusions Limited physical capacity was the only patient and lifestyle factor associated with poorer postoperative complications and prolonged hospital stay after elective colorectal surgery within an ERAS programme. Consideration should be given to individualised prehabilitation that aims to increase physical capacity pre-operatively to improve patient outcomes.

P175 TRANSLATION OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FROM RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL SETTING (TIME) TO NATIONAL PRACTICE (DUCA) IN NETHERLANDS

2019 ◽  
Vol 32 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Markar Sheraz ◽  
Ni Melody ◽  
Gisbertz Suzanne ◽  
Straatman Jennifer ◽  
van der Peet Donald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Time Trial ◽  
Reoperation Rate ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy

Abstract Aims The TIME trial showed reduced pulmonary complications from minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) over an open approach, and led to widespread adoption of MIE in the Netherlands. The aim of this study was to compare clinical outcomes from minimally invasive esophagectomy in the DUCA (national dataset) and the TIME trial (RCT) for transthoracic esophagectomy1. Methods Original patient data from the TIME trial1 was extracted along-with data from the Dutch National Cancer Audit (DUCA) (2011-2017). Initially univariate analysis was used to compare patient and tumor demographics and clinical and pathological outcomes from patients receiving MIE in the TIME trial and in the DUCA-dataset. Secondly multivariate analysis, with adjustment patient and tumor factors, was performed for the effect of MIE vs. Open esophagectomy on clinical outcomes in both datasets. Thirdly the datasets were combined and multivariate analysis, was performed for the effect of patient inclusion in TIME trial or DUCA-dataset. Results 115 patients from TIME (59 MIE vs. 56 open) and 4605 patients from the DUCA-dataset (2652 MIE vs. 1953 open) were included. Univariate analysis showed, in TIME trial, MIE reduced postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. However in the DUCA-dataset, MIE increased postoperative complications, re-intervention rate and length of hospital stay, however pathological benefits included increased proportion of R0 margin and lymph nodes harvested. Multivariate analysis confirmed the TIME data showed MIE reduced postoperative complications (OR=0.38, 95%CI 0.16–0.90). In the DUCA-dataset, MIE was associated with increased postoperative complications (OR=1.37, 95%CI 1.20–1.55), re-intervention (OR=1.84, 95%CI 1.57–2.14), and length of hospital stay (Coeff=1.57, 95%CI 0.06–3.08). Pathological benefits to MIE in the DUCA-dataset included a reduction in proportion of R1 margin, and increased lymph node harvest. Multivariate analysis of the combined dataset, showed inclusion in the TIME trial was associated with a reduction in postoperative complications (OR=0.23, 95%CI 0.15–0.36) and reoperation rate (OR=0.34, 95%CI 0.17–0.66). Conclusions MIE when adopted nationally outside the TIME-trial, was associated with an increase in postoperative complications and reoperation rate, which may reflect surgeons on a national level going through their proficiency-gain curve in the technique and outside of expert MIE centers.

scholarly journals Albumin and CRP, Which is the Best Biomarker for Postoperative Complications on Colorectal Surgery? Prospective Cohort Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel Fernandes Cunha ◽  
Beatriz Mendes ◽  
Pedro Mendanha ◽  
Ines Miguel ◽  
Juan Rachadell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Predictive Marker ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Predictive Values

Abstract Aim Our purpose was to investigate the potential role of albumin variation in comparison to C-reactive protein (CRP) variation as a predictive marker for postoperative complications in colorectal surgery. Methods An prospective cohort study was conducted. Adult patients who underwent elective colorectal surgery between January 2019 and December 2020 were eligible. Serum levels of albumin and CRP were measured preoperatively and on the first 4 postoperative days. Univariate analysis were performed to assess the association of albumin (Alb) and CRP with postoperative complications. Serum albumin variation (ΔAlb) and CRP variation (ΔCRP) were calculated. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and the Youden test were used to determine acuity and predictive cut-off values. Results Ninety-three patients were included. A CRP cut-off of 83.4 mg/dL on postoperative day (POD) 4 was the best predictor of postoperative global complications (p<0.001; AUC 0.83, 70% sensitivity, 91% specificity). Major complications were best correlated with ΔAlb on POD 2, 3 and 4 (p<0.001), with a ΔAlb cut-off of 27.4% on POD 2 showing the strongest association with this outcome (AUC 0.834, 83% sensitivity, 90% specificity). Regarding anastomotic leak, CRP on POD 3 showed better predictive values (p=0.037; AUC 0.792) with a cut-off value of 88.7 mg/dL (100% sensitivity, 52% specificity). Discussion Herein, the authors demonstrate there is a role for albumin variation, as an earlier and sensitive marker, to predict major postoperative complications in colorectal surgery. This analysis may be further applied to aid in the early identification of significant causes of re-operation and long-term morbimortality.

scholarly journals Application of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocols in Colorectal Cancer, Complicated by Malignant Bowel Obstruction: a Review of the Literature

2021 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-15
Author(s):  
Vasil M. Dimitrov
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery ◽  
Recovery Period ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Colorectal Obstruction ◽  
Emergency Colorectal Surgery

Summary Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are standard in elective colorectal surgery. They lead to decreasing postoperative complications and shorten the hospital stay and the recovery period. Following these protocols is associated with better short-term results and better and disease-free survival in cases of respectable colorectal carcinomas. There is clear evidence of the beneficial effect of the protocols in reducing the rate of postoperative complications and shortening the hospital stay after elective colorectal surgery. There remains the question of whether these protocols are applicable effective in patients after emergency colorectal surgery. Over the last years, safe and effective ERAS protocols have been reported in patients with life-threatening conditions such as colorectal obstruction and intraabdominal infection.

scholarly journals P7: ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY AFTER ELECTIVE COLORECTAL SURGERY: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL CLOSED-LOOP AUDIT

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Quality Improvement ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Prognostic Score ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
National Quality ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Uk

Abstract Introduction The aim of this study was to re-audit the rates of acute kidney injury (AKI) after elective colorectal surgery, following local presentations of results. Method Outcomes After Kidney injury in Surgery (OAKS) and Ileus Management International (IMAGINE), were prospective multicentre audits on consecutive elective colorectal resections, in the UK and Ireland. These were performed over 3-month periods in 2015 and 2018 respectively. During the interim period, results were presented at participating centres to stimulate local quality improvement initiatives. Risk-adjusted 7-day postoperative AKI rates were calculated through multilevel logistic regression based on the OAKS prognostic score. Result Of the 4,917 patients included, 3,133 (63.7%) originated from OAKS and 1,784 (36.3%) from IMAGINE. On univariate analysis, there was no significant difference (p=0.737) in the 7-day AKI rate between OAKS (n=346, 11.8%) and IMAGINE (n=205, 11.5%). However, the risk-adjusted AKI rate in IMAGINE was significantly lower compared to OAKS (-1.8%, 95% CI: -2.3% to -1.3%, p&lt;0.001). Of 47 centres (40.1%) with a recorded local presentation, there was no significant difference in the subsequent AKI rate in IMAGINE (-0.7%, -2.0% to 0.6%, p=0.278). Conclusion Rates of AKI after elective colorectal surgery significantly reduced on re-audit. However, this may be related to increased awareness from participation or national quality improvement initiatives, rather than local presentation of results. Abbrev. AKI - Acute Kidney Injury, OAKS - Outcomes After Kidney injury in Surgery, IMAGINE - Ileus Management International Take-home message Risk-adjusted AKI rates significantly reduced on re-audit, however, this was most likely due to factors separate from the local presentation of initial results.

Frailty predicts severe postoperative complications after elective colorectal surgery

2019 ◽  
Vol 217 (4) ◽  
pp. 677-681 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hirohisa Okabe ◽  
Takayuki Ohsaki ◽  
Katsuhiro Ogawa ◽  
Nobuyuki Ozaki ◽  
Hiromitsu Hayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery

scholarly journals Implementation of Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy From a Randomized Controlled Trial Setting to National Practice

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (19) ◽  
pp. 2130-2139 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheraz R. Markar ◽  
Melody Ni ◽  
Suzanne S. Gisbertz ◽  
Leonie van der Werf ◽  
Jennifer Straatman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Time Trial ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
Invasive Technique ◽  
Invasive Esophagectomy

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to examine the external validity of the randomized TIME trial, when minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) was implemented nationally in the Netherlands, using data from the Dutch Upper GI Cancer Audit (DUCA) for transthoracic esophagectomy. METHODS Original patient data from the TIME trial were extracted along with data from the DUCA dataset (2011-2017). Multivariate analysis, with adjustment for patient factors, tumor factors, and year of surgery, was performed for the effect of MIE versus open esophagectomy on clinical outcomes. RESULTS One hundred fifteen patients from the TIME trial (59 MIE v 56 open) and 4,605 patients from the DUCA dataset (2,652 MIE v 1,953 open) were included. In the TIME trial, univariate analysis showed that MIE reduced pulmonary complications and length of hospital stay. On the contrary, in the DUCA dataset, MIE was associated with increased total and pulmonary complications and reoperations; however, benefits included increased proportion of R0 margin and lymph nodes harvested, and reduced 30-day mortality. Multivariate analysis from the TIME trial showed that MIE reduced pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06 to 0.61). In the DUCA dataset, MIE was associated with increased total complications (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19 to 1.57), pulmonary complications (OR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.29 to 1.74), reoperations (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.42 to 2.14), and length of hospital stay. Multivariate analysis of the combined and MIE datasets showed that inclusion in the TIME trial was associated with a reduction in reoperations, Clavien-Dindo grade > 1 complications, and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION When adopted nationally outside the TIME trial, MIE was associated with an increase in total and pulmonary complications and reoperation rate. This may reflect nonexpert surgeons outside of high-volume centers performing this minimally invasive technique in a nonstandardized fashion outside of a controlled environment.

scholarly journals Factors affecting survival in 43 consecutive patients after surgery for spinal metastases from thyroid carcinoma

2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonathan N. Sellin ◽  
Dima Suki ◽  
Viraat Harsh ◽  
Benjamin D. Elder ◽  
Daniel K. Fahim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Postoperative Complications ◽  
Systemic Disease ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Spinal Metastases ◽  
Neurological Deficits ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Preoperative Embolization

OBJECT Spinal metastases account for the majority of bone metastases from thyroid cancer. The objective of the current study was to analyze a series of consecutive patients undergoing spinal surgery for thyroid cancer metastases in order to identify factors that influence overall survival. METHODS The authors retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who underwent surgery for spinal metastases from thyroid cancer between 1993 and 2010 at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. RESULTS Forty-three patients met the study criteria. Median overall survival was 15.4 months (95% CI 2.8–27.9 months) based on the Kaplan-Meier method. The median follow-up duration for the 4 patients who were alive at the end of the study was 39.4 months (range 1.7–62.6 months). On the multivariate Cox analysis, progressive systemic disease at spine surgery and postoperative complications were associated with worse overall survival (HR 8.98 [95% CI 3.46–23.30], p < 0.001; and HR 2.86 [95% CI 1.30–6.31], p = 0.009, respectively). Additionally, preoperative neurological deficit was significantly associated with worse overall survival on the multivariate analysis (HR 3.01 [95% CI 1.34–6.79], p = 0.008). Conversely, preoperative embolization was significantly associated with improved overall survival on the multivariate analysis (HR 0.43 [95% CI 0.20–0.94], p = 0.04). Preoperative embolization and longer posterior construct length were significantly associated with fewer and greater complications, respectively, on the univariate analysis (OR 0.24 [95% CI 0.06–0.93] p = 0.04; and OR 1.24 [95% CI 1.02–1.52], p = 0.03), but not the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Progressive systemic disease, postoperative complications, and preoperative neurological deficits were significantly associated with worse overall survival, while preoperative spinal embolization was associated with improved overall survival. These factors should be taken into consideration when considering such patients for surgery. Preoperative embolization and posterior construct length significantly influenced the incidence of postoperative complications only on the univariate analysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document