Estimation of Radioactivities in the IFMIF Liquid Lithium Loop Due to the Erosion and Corrosion of Target Back-Wall

2005 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 1008-1011
Author(s):  
M. Yamauchi ◽  
M. Takemura ◽  
H. Nakamura ◽  
U. Fischer ◽  
M. Ida ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
Sergej Gordeev ◽  
Volker Heinzel

The International Fusion Materials Facility (IFMIF) uses a high speed Lithium (Li) free surface flow as a target, which is hit by two deuteron beams having each a power of 5 MW. The major function of the Li target is to provide a stable Li surface layer for the production of an intense neutron flux, to remove by forced convection the beam energy deposited in the Li layer and to avoid an overheat of the back wall structure beyond material sustainable limits. The target flow is conditioned by sophisticated shaped nozzle. Downstream the nozzle the liquid metal flows along a concave shaped back-wall in order to generate an increased pressure within the Lithium layer, which elevates the boiling temperature of the liquid. This article describes an analytical and numerical fluid dynamic study of the secondary liquid motions potentially occurring due to the concave shaped wall as well as its impact on the temperature distribution within the liquid lithium. First, the secondary flow distributions appearing in a turbulent flow along a curved wall are analyzed, where the major attention is paid to Goertler vortices, which emerge exceeding a critical flow velocity as a convective instability due to centrifugal forces. Further, a large-eddy simulation (LES) of the turbulent flow along the back-wall is conducted and the obtained data are compared to experiments. The results show that both the formation of the Goertler vortices as well as their decay are reasonably well predicted by the simulation. After the validation of the LES method the simulation has been transferred to the lithium target geometry at IFMIF standard operation conditions assuming decreased lithium layer thicknesses down to 23 mm. In this context besides the LES a conventional fluid dynamic computations based on the Reynolds-averaged turbulence model have been performed. The results show that the Reynolds-averaged models are not capable to predict the occurrence of Goertler vortices as the LES does. The formation of the Goertler vortices, however, yields to hot spots at the back wall which can reach temperature rises of more than 100°C compared to the nominal case.


2021 ◽  
Vol 26 ◽  
pp. 100935
Author(s):  
Andrei Khodak ◽  
Rajesh Maingi

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 2595
Author(s):  
Ryo Karakawa ◽  
Hidehiko Yoshimatsu ◽  
Keisuke Kamiya ◽  
Yuma Fuse ◽  
Tomoyuki Yano

Background: Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) is a challenging procedure and requires a sophisticated supermicrosurgical technique. The aim of this study was to evaluate and establish a discrete supermicrosurgical anastomosis method using the “suture-stent technique”. Methods: Forty-eight LVA sites of twenty patients with lower extremity lymphedema who had undergone LVA between July 2020 and January 2021 were included in this study. LVA was performed with the conventional technique or with the suture-stent technique. The patency of the anastomoses was evaluated using an infrared camera system intraoperatively. The success rate on the first try and the final success rate for each group were compared. Results: After full application of the exclusion criteria, 35 LVAs of 16 patients including 20 limbs were included in the analysis. The ratio of good patency findings after anastomosis in the suture-stent technique group was 100%. The incidences of leakage or occlusion on the first try were statistically greater in the conventional technique group (29.4%) than in the suture-stent technique group (0%) (p = 0.0191). All anastomoses achieved good patency in the final results. Conclusion: With its minimal risk of catching the back wall during the anastomosis, the suture-stent technique can be considered an optimal anastomosis option for LVA.


2021 ◽  
Vol 170 ◽  
pp. 112548
Author(s):  
Ryo Omura ◽  
Juro Yagi ◽  
Keisuke Mukai ◽  
Makoto Oyaidzu ◽  
Kentaro Ochiai ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1203-1208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Zhou ◽  
Kendall Fitzgerald ◽  
Paul D. Boyle ◽  
Wesley A. Henderson

1992 ◽  
Vol 21 (3P2B) ◽  
pp. 2099-2106 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.K. Sze ◽  
R.F. Mattas ◽  
A.B. Hull ◽  
B. Picologlou ◽  
D.L. Smith

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Halfon ◽  
G. Feinberg ◽  
M. Paul ◽  
A. Arenshtam ◽  
D. Berkovits ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 89 (12) ◽  
pp. 2915-2918 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.B. Martín-Rojo ◽  
E. Oyarzabal ◽  
F.L. Tabarés

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document