American Philanthropic Foundations: Regional Difference and Change by David C. Hammack and Steve Rathgeb Smith (eds) (2018)

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 467-469
Author(s):  
Andrew Curtis
Keyword(s):  
Regional Difference ◽  
Philanthropic Foundations

Book Review-American Philanthropic Foundations: Regional Difference and Change

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele Fugiel Gartner
Keyword(s):  
Regional Difference ◽  
Indiana University ◽  
Philanthropic Foundations

American Philanthropic Foundations: Regional Difference and Change David C. Hammack and Steven Rathgeb Smith (Eds.) Indiana University Press (2018) Reviewed by: Michele Fugiel Gartner

THE REGIONAL DIFFERENCE ON THE STRUCTURE OF CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY IN CHINA

2007 ◽  
Vol 72 (613) ◽  
pp. 173-180
Author(s):  
Jinrong CUI ◽  
Naruo KANO ◽  
Yasuaki KOBAYASHI
Keyword(s):  
Construction Industry ◽  
Regional Difference

A Study on the Regional Difference of Happiness and Factors Affecting Citizens’ Happiness

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-198
Author(s):  
Bogyeong Min ◽  
Wooseong Jeong
Keyword(s):  
Regional Difference ◽  
Factors Affecting

Happiness Map of Korea: Regional Difference in Happiness in Korea Using Social Media

2019 ◽  
Vol 38 (4) ◽  
pp. 647-667
Author(s):  
Eunsoo Choi ◽  
Incheol Choi ◽  
Jongan Choi
Keyword(s):  
Social Media ◽  
Regional Difference

scholarly journals Agenda-setting and Public Policy in Private Foundations

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Kate Williamson ◽  
Belinda Luke
Keyword(s):  
Public Policy ◽  
Agenda Setting ◽  
Public Communication ◽  
Philanthropic Foundations ◽  
Policy Influence ◽  
The Public ◽  
Private Foundations ◽  
Social Causes ◽  
The U.S

AbstractThis paper examines advocacy, agenda-setting and the public policy focus of private philanthropic foundations in Australia. While concerns have been raised regarding advocacy and public policy influence of foundations in countries such as the U.S., less is understood on this issue in other contexts. Interviews were conducted with 11 managers and trustees of 10 Private Ancillary Funds (PAFs) in late 2014. Analysis of publicly available data on the participating PAFs was then undertaken comparing PAF information available at the time of the interviews with that available approximately five years later, to consider any changes in the public communication of their agendas. Findings reveal PAFs’ agendas were largely consistent with public policy but may vary in the approaches to address social causes. Further, a preference for privacy indicates the PAF sector may be characterised as ‘quiet philanthropy’ rather than having a visible public presence. As such, PAFs’ advocacy focused on promoting philanthropy, rather than altering or influencing public policy. Our main contention is that the conceptions of advocacy in structured philanthropy are dominated by the obvious, the outliers and the noisy. Our contribution to the philanthropic literature is a more nuanced and broader discussion of how advocacy and agenda-setting occurs and is understood in the mainstream.

Regional Difference in Scaling Laws for Large Earthquakes and its Tectonic Implication

2000 ◽  
Vol 157 (11) ◽  
pp. 2283-2301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Fujii ◽  
M. Matsu’ura
Keyword(s):  
Regional Difference ◽  
Scaling Laws ◽  
Tectonic Implication ◽  
Large Earthquakes

scholarly journals Impact of Regional Difference in Recovery Rate on the Total Population of Infected for a Diffusive SIS Model

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 888
Author(s):  
Jumpei Inoue ◽  
Kousuke Kuto
Keyword(s):  
Recovery Rate ◽  
Regional Difference ◽  
Total Population ◽  
Reproduction Number ◽  
Reaction Diffusion ◽  
Logistic Equation ◽  
Sis Model ◽  
Reaction Diffusion Model ◽  
Diffusive Logistic Equation ◽  
Sis Epidemic

This paper is concerned with an SIS epidemic reaction-diffusion model. The purpose of this paper is to derive some effects of the spatial heterogeneity of the recovery rate on the total population of infected and the reproduction number. The proof is based on an application of our previous result on the unboundedness of the ratio of the species to the resource for a diffusive logistic equation. Our pure mathematical result can be epidemically interpreted as that a regional difference in the recovery rate can make the infected population grow in the case when the reproduction number is slightly larger than one.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document