Integrating the theory of planned behaviour and self-determination theory in health behaviour: A meta-analysis

2009 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin S. Hagger ◽  
Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 110-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona B. Gillison ◽  
Peter Rouse ◽  
Martyn Standage ◽  
Simon J. Sebire ◽  
Richard M. Ryan

Author(s):  
Alvaro Sicilia ◽  
Cornelio Águila ◽  
Magalí Posse ◽  
Manuel Alcaraz-Ibáñez

Based on the theory of planned behaviour and self-determination theory, the objective of the present study was to analyse the relationship between (i) parents’ and peers’ autonomy support, and (ii) exercise intention in adolescents, while also considering the mediating role of attitude, control, subjective norms, and descriptive norms. A total of 428 secondary school students, aged between 13 and 19 years old (Mage = 15.30, SD = 1.15), filled in a questionnaire assessing the variables of interest. The relationships between the study variables were examined through a mediation model with bootstrapping technique (20,000 samples) using Mplus v. 7 software. The results showed that the perception of parents’ autonomy support was positively and statistically significant associated with exercise intention; this occurring indirectly through attitude and control both in boys and girls, as well as through subjective norms in the case of girls. Conversely, the perception of peers’ autonomy support was positively and statistically significant associated with exercise intention; this occurring directly both in boys and girls, as well as indirectly through attitude in the case of girls. These findings suggest that, by involving a form of pressure (i.e., subjective/descriptive norms), perceptions of autonomy support may play a more important role than other forms of social influence in predicting exercise intention in adolescents.


2020 ◽  
Vol 112 (7) ◽  
pp. 1444-1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diego Vasconcellos ◽  
Philip D. Parker ◽  
Toni Hilland ◽  
Renata Cinelli ◽  
Katherine B. Owen ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keven Joyal-Desmarais ◽  
Richie L Lenne ◽  
Mary Elizabeth Panos ◽  
Chloe O. Huelsnitz ◽  
Rachael E. Jones ◽  
...  

Objective: Interpersonal relationships are important predictors of health outcomes, and interpersonal influences on behaviours may be key mechanisms underlying such effects. Most health behaviour theories focus on intrapersonal factors and may not adequately account for interpersonal influences. We evaluate a dyadic extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour by examining whether parent and adolescent characteristics (attitudes, subjective norms, perceived behavioural control, intentions) are associated with not only their own, but also each other’s intentions/behaviours. Design: Using the Actor-Partner Interdependence Model, we analyse responses from 1,717 parent-adolescent dyads from the Family Life, Activity, Sun, Health, and Eating study. Main Outcome Measures: Adolescents/parents completed self-reports of their fruit and vegetable consumption, junk food and sugary drinks consumption, engagement in physical activity, and engagement in screen time sedentary behaviours. Results: Parent/adolescent characteristics are associated with each other’s health-relevant intentions/behaviours above the effects of individuals’ own characteristics on their own behaviours. Parent/adolescent characteristics covary with each other’s outcomes with similar strength, but parent characteristics more strongly relate to adolescent intentions, whereas adolescent characteristics more strongly relate to parent behaviours. Conclusions: Parents and adolescents may bidirectionally influence each other’s health intentions/behaviours. This highlights the importance of dyadic models of health behaviour and suggests intervention targets.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document