Expert Perspectives on the Inclusion of Students With Significant Disabilities in Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

Inclusion ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 276-289
Author(s):  
Alison L. Zagona ◽  
Virginia L. Walker ◽  
Kirsten R. Lansey ◽  
Jennifer Kurth
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Reward Systems ◽  
Educational Placement ◽  
Significant Disabilities ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Students With Significant Disabilities

Abstract Schoolwide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (SWPBIS) is a framework intended to benefit all students in a school. However, recent research suggests that students with significant disabilities may not fully participate in SWPBIS. Given the complex reasons for varied involvement in SWPBIS (e.g., student educational placement), the purpose of this study was to investigate expert perspectives on the extent to which students with significant disabilities should be included in SWPBIS. Overall, experts agreed students with significant disabilities should be included in all tiers of SWPBIS, receive instruction in schoolwide rules and expectations, and have the opportunity to participate in schoolwide reward systems. Experts shared differing perspectives on the ways behavior violations of students with significant disabilities should be documented.

scholarly journals Examining National Trends in Educational Placements for Students With Significant Disabilities

2016 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E. Morningstar ◽  
Jennifer A. Kurth ◽  
Paul E. Johnson
Keyword(s):  
General Education ◽  
Multiple Disabilities ◽  
Annual Reports ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Educational Placement ◽  
Significant Disabilities ◽  
Educational Placements ◽  
National Trends ◽  
Log Ratio ◽  
Students With Significant Disabilities

Using the least restrictive environments (LRE) data from annual Reports to Congress, this study examined national trends in placement between 2000 and 2014 for school-aged students considered to have significant disabilities from among the categories of autism (ASD), intellectual disability (ID), multiple disabilities (MD), and deaf-blindness (DB). Educational placement trends were calculated using a log ratio index, and students with significant disabilities were compared with groups of students from the other disability groups. Results confirmed that access to general education settings is lacking for this group of students. Implications for policies and practices as well as suggested future research are provided.

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports in Schools: A Tutorial

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yolanda Keller-Bell ◽  
Maureen Short
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Systems ◽  
Language Therapy ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
School Settings ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Behavioral Expectations ◽  
Outcomes For Children

Purpose Positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) provide a framework for behavioral expectations in school systems for children with and without disabilities. Speech-language pathologists who work in school settings should be familiar with this framework as part of their role in improving the outcomes for children. The purpose of this tutorial is to discuss PBIS and its use in school settings. Method The authors provide an overview of the PBIS framework and focus on its applicability in classroom-based settings. The process of implementing PBIS in classrooms and other settings such as speech-language therapy is discussed. Conclusions This tutorial provides speech-language pathologists with an overview of PBIS and may facilitate their understanding of how to implement PBIS in nonclassroom settings.

Optimal Timing for Launching Installation of Tier 2 and 3 Systems of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

2021 ◽  
pp. 109830072199608
Author(s):  
Angus Kittelman ◽  
Sterett H. Mercer ◽  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Robert Hoselton
Keyword(s):  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Structural Equation ◽  
Equation Modeling ◽  
Optimal Timing ◽  
First Year ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Tier 1 ◽  
Tier 3

The purpose of this longitudinal study was to examine patterns in implementation of Tier 2 and 3 school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) systems to identify timings of installation that led to higher implementation of advanced tiers. Extant data from 776 schools in 27 states reporting on the first 3 years of Tier 2 implementation and 359 schools in 23 states reporting on the first year of Tier 3 implementation were analyzed. Using structural equation modeling, we found that higher Tier 1 implementation predicted subsequent Tier 2 and Tier 3 implementation. In addition, waiting 2 or 3 years after initial Tier 1 implementation to launch Tier 2 systems predicted higher initial Tier 2 implementation (compared with implementing the next year). Finally, we found that launching Tier 3 systems after Tier 2 systems, compared with launching both tiers simultaneously, predicted higher Tier 2 implementation in the second and third year, so long as Tier 3 systems were launched within 3 years of Tier 2 systems. These findings provide empirical guidance for when to launch Tier 2 and 3 systems; however, we emphasize that delays in launching advanced systems should not equate to delays in more intensive supports for students.

Enhancing motivation and engagement within a PBIS framework

2021 ◽  
pp. 136548022110022
Author(s):  
Michael Petrasek ◽  
Anthony James ◽  
Amity Noltemeyer ◽  
Jennifer Green ◽  
Katelyn Palmer
Keyword(s):  
School Environment ◽  
Student Outcomes ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
School Setting ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Motivation And Engagement ◽  
Core Features

A motivating and engaging school environment has been associated with several positive student outcomes. Consequently, schools have an opportunity and responsibility to promote a culture that supports students in developing and maintaining their motivation, engagement, and self-improvement. Efforts to promote such a culture can be embedded within a Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) framework. In this paper, we begin by describing motivation and engagement, and discussing the relevance of these concepts in schools. Next, we introduce the traditional PBIS framework, highlighting research and core features. Third, we propose how PBIS can be enhanced by incorporating a focus on relationships, engagement, and motivation in the school setting. Finally, we conclude with recommendations for school teams seeking to implement this approach.

Variables Associated With Enhanced Sustainability of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kent McIntosh ◽  
Jerin Kim ◽  
Sterett H. Mercer ◽  
M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen ◽  
Robert H. Horner
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions

Utilizing Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports to Reinforce Therapeutic Practices in the Schools

2015 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyndsey Zurawski
Keyword(s):  
Students With Disabilities ◽  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Classroom Setting ◽  
Behavior Interventions ◽  
Behavioral Strategies ◽  
Speech Language Pathologists ◽  
Positive Behavior Interventions ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Therapeutic Services ◽  
Support Students

Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are faced with providing therapeutic services to students with a variety of disorders. Students with disorders such as speech and language impairments, autism, and intellectual disabilities can demonstrate behaviors within the classroom setting. Speech-language pathologists are a part of a collaborative team responsible for providing supports or interventions. Often, SLPs are unaware of behavioral strategies/interventions that correlate to school-wide expectations. This article provides examples of positive behavior interventions and supports (PBIS) that can be utilized to support students with disabilities in and out of the classroom.

Examining Teaming and Tier 2 and 3 Practices Within a PBIS Framework

2021 ◽  
pp. 109830072110510
Author(s):  
Rhonda N. T. Nese ◽  
Angus Kittelman ◽  
M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen ◽  
Kent McIntosh
Keyword(s):  
Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Data Use ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Tier 2 ◽  
Behavior Support ◽  
Evidence Based Practices ◽  
Research And Practice ◽  
Positive Behavioral Interventions ◽  
Core Feature

One core feature of Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support (PBIS) is a systems-level teaming process for coordinating staff implementation of evidence-based practices and monitoring student progress across all three tiers. Prior research has shown schools that report regular teaming and team-based data use are more likely to successfully adopt and sustain implementation of multi-tiered systems of behavior support. However, more research is currently needed to better understand the various teaming configurations, structures, and practices commonly used by PBIS teams in typical schools, particularly at advanced tiers. For the current study, members of school and district PBIS teams representing 718 schools were surveyed to better understand (a) teaming configurations and practices currently being used in schools implementing PBIS and (b) common interventions that PBIS teams report implementing at Tiers 2 and 3. Survey findings are discussed, along with implications of those results for future research and practice in applied settings.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document